Connect with us

News

Mexican Restaurant Slammed for Serving Jeff Sessions…It’s Just Food, People

Published

on

Is there nothing in this world that doesn’t have to be tied to Trump and then subsequently boycotted?

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who, believe it or not, is a human and eats food, recently visited a Houston Mexican restaurant which is now being slammed by bad reviews on Yelp and calls to protest.

Why?

Trending: IT HAPPENED: The Next James Bond Is Confirmed to Be A Black Female [Details]

Becuase everything is political now.

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?

  • Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Critics were clearly upset that Sessions, who is obviously a racist and specifically hates Mexicans because he has upheld federal law on our Southern borders, had not been turned away and spat on by the proprietors, who certainly must be illegal immigrants themselves, because they’re Mexican, right? And if you say there’s a difference between illegal and illegal immigrants, you’re a racist. Nevermind that there are millions of Mexican-Americans living in the United States who were born here…where was I going with this?

Oh, yeah.

Jeff Sessions can’t eat Mexican food unless he throws open our Southern border, apparently.

The Daily Caller reports that “El Tiempo Cantina said on Saturday that the Secret Service alerted the restaurant to their impending arrival but the management was unaware of who was going to be dining there.

“The secret service contacted us that a government official was coming to dinner at our establishment and his identity was not known until he walked through the door,” the restaurant’s owner, Roland Laurenzo, told The Hill.

When he dared take his picture with the Attorney General, whom, remember, everyone must hate or they are indeed a racist, he was forced to later apologize and appeal to the gods of progressive political correctness, saying:

The posting of a photograph of the Attorney General at one of our restaurants does not represent us supporting his positions. El Tiempo does not in anyway support the practice of separating children from parents or any other practices of the government relative to immigration.

There was once a time in this country when any business would be happy to serve someone as prominent as the Attorney General, regardless of policy or political affiliation. It’s called good business. Not to mention patriotism.

But it’s 2018, and you have to either kick members of the Trump administration out of your restaurant, or you’re pretty much just ripping illegal immigrant families apart personally.

There is no in between.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Beto O’Rourke Drops Bombshell About Connection To Slavery

Where’s the liberal outrage?

Published

on

In a move that should, if the left were consistent, spell the end of his political aspirations, Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke revealed that both he and his wife are descendants of slave owners. Yes, a consistent application of the beliefs of the modern-day progressive should see Beto dropping from the race and spending the rest of his life attempting to atone for the sins of his ancestors. Probably not going to actually happen though. You know, because hypocrisy or something. via The Daily Wire: The failed Texas Senate candidate, who is losing ground in the presidential race, made the revelation in a Medium post, saying that he was recently given documents that revealed his family’s past. “A paternal great-great-great grandfather of mine, Andrew Cowan Jasper, owned these two women in the 1850s,” O’Rourke wrote. “There are also records showing that a maternal great-great-great grandfather, Frederick Williams, most likely owned slaves in the 1860s (“most likely,” because we are not certain that the Frederick Williams who is my ancestor and the Frederick Williams who owned slaves are the same person, but there’s enough circumstantial data to lead me to conclude that it’s likely).” “Records also showed that Amy had an ancestor who owned slaves and another who was a member of the Confederate Army,” O’Rourke added. O’Rourke’s claim comes after the media last week tried to tie Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s opposition to reparations to the fact that his great-great-grandfathers owned slaves. When the media tried to push that narrative they were met with the fact that former President Barack Obama’s ancestors were slave owners. Sen. Kamala Harris’ ancestors also owned slaves. So where is all of the classic liberal outrage over these folks having this sort of bloodline? Surely they would have no problem striking at these kind…

Continue Reading

News

Trump Administration Set To Carry Out Major Crackdown On Asylum Abuse

This is going to make liberals absolutely furious.

Published

on

The Trump administration has announced some major changes in the country’s current asylum policies that will inevitably lead to a sizable reduction in the number of individuals that are eligible for asylum who are trying to enter the country at the southern border. If you listen closely, you can hear the left already throwing a total fit over this, ready to compare the president to a whole plethora of deplorable fascist world leaders throughout history. via Daily Wire: “The new rule, published in the Federal Register, would require most migrants entering through America’s southern border to first seek asylum in one of the countries they traversed – whether in Mexico, in Central America, or elsewhere on their journey,” Fox News reported. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) highlighted three limited exceptions: (1) an alien who demonstrates that he or she applied for protection from persecution or torture in at least one of the countries through which the alien transited en route to the United States, and the alien received a final judgment denying the alien protection in such country; (2) an alien who demonstrates that he or she satisfies the definition of “victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons” provided in 8 C.F.R. § 214.11; or, (3) an alien who has transited en route to the United States through only a country or countries that were not parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the 1967 Protocol, or the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The statement went on to detail that a very small minority of these individuals actually receive asylum, however, a large number of requests burdens the system and undermines its humanitarian purposes. The statement also notes the large number of requests…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend