Connect with us


More and More Brands Seem to Be Going Openly Liberal. Here’s the Lowdown on Why.



Earlier this week, Nike, the world’s leading shoe brand, unveiled the individual who would be the face of the 30th anniversary of their wildly popular “Just Do It” campaign, and it was none other than controversial former quarterback Colin Kaepernick.

Clearly, Nike is coming out as a hard left company, as they are supporting Kaepernick and his racially divisive form of protest which consists of taking a knee during the National Anthem, a move that many see as disrespectful to veterans as well as a gesture of ingratitude, seeing as how this country provides people like Kaepernick the opportunity to make millions of dollars by just playing a game.

Nike isn’t the only brand to come out as liberal in the last few years, leaving many folks wondering why these companies keep opening up politically, knowing that doing so will end up alienating a large segment of their customer base and thus, adversely impacting their bottom line.

Trending: American Music Icon Dead at 72; Was Set to Tour This Summer

Well, truth be told, while they are most definitely going to lose some folks,  they end up gaining far more in other ways, which is precisely why they are doing it.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?

  • Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

You see, consumers this day and age expect the companies they purchase goods and services from to reflect their moral and political values, thus when a brand takes a stand on a controversial issue, it usually strengthens its bond with a particular demographic of individuals who share those same values, which ultimately translates into those folks buying more of that company’s products or at least being willing to pay a higher price for them as a means of showing support to the business.

However, this seems to only work when engaging to the left of the political spectrum and not to the right.

Unfortunately for conservatives, markets for consumer products are not democracies. As American politics gets more polarized by age and less polarized by income, most brands’ target customer will tend to move left relative to the country’s political median, even as the average voter sits to the right of the whole country’s political median.

For example, a poll conducted for The Washington Post in May found that 63% of respondents over age 50 thought it was “never” appropriate to protest by kneeling during the national anthem; only 38% of respondents under 30 said the same.

Younger Americans are also more ethnically diverse than older Americans, so a company trying to sell to young people is naturally selling into a much more diverse “electorate” than a political party running a national election in which the average congressional district is significantly whiter than the country as a whole.

So, think about the demographic of who’s most upset about Kaepernick’s protest movement, and then think about how much an athletic-apparel company needs to concern itself with the opinions of senior citizens, and then think about why Nike thinks this ad campaign will improve its sales.

There is also the problem that conservatives are desperately uncool.

You’d think some brands would try to get on the conservative side of big political issues — you make the conservative sneaker, I’ll make the liberal sneaker, and both of us can enjoy higher profit margins because we don’t have to compete with each other on price. Alas, the conservative shoemaker will face a coolness deficit with not-especially-political consumers, not to mention with the left-leaning creative professionals he’ll need to market the shoes in the first place.

Another important reason why liberal companies seem to benefit more from being open about their political ideology has to do with the fact that the vast majority of folks who are considered influential — think celebrities who endorse products as one example — are left-of-center for the most part, thus giving left-wing companies a bigger boost in the sales department than their conservative counterparts.

The bottom line is that, while companies will certainly suffer some losses from conservatives who decide not to purchase their products anymore due to their left-wing stances on some issues, it’s a price they are willing to pay in order to gain a better, more consistent, loyal following from a younger demographic who will translate into lifelong customers, providing greater stability and longevity for the company.

Unfortunately, until conservatives are willing to admit that they have failed to properly engage the culture at large and work toward revamping the image conservatives currently have with young people, this trend isn’t likely to change.

Source: Business Insider


Harrowing Tale of Week-Long Bear Attack is a Hoax, Say Investigators

Well this is embarrassing.



It was only a few days ago that the world became familiar with a truly stupendous tale out of America’s last frontier. A man, stranded at a remote cabin in the Alaskan bush, was being haunted and hunted every night by a vicious bear, after being mauled ever so slightly on his first day on site.  His rescuers arrived after a week of these nightly attacks, and only after the stranded man was able to create a plea for help large enough to be seen by the air. The only issue with the story is that the whole thing appears to be made up, at least according to local researchers.  While the story went viral worldwide and more details came to light about the incident, some community members began to express concerns and doubt about the veracity of the tale. The cabin [Richard] Jessee took refuge in, as it turns out, was not his. It belonged to a fellow miner, though Jessee’s cabin sat only a few yards away. “We went out there to the cabin, but we couldn’t find a bear track within 500 feet of the place, but it should have been all torn up, according to his story,” said one anonymous source known to the Nugget. “There’s no hair, no tracks, no scat, nothing.” And also… The Coast Guard crew delivered him to an ambulance in Nome, which took him to Norton Sound Health Regional hospital. “We were told to get a man who had been mauled by a bear,” said Jim West Jr., the Nome Volunteer Fire and Ambulance chief. “He walked off the helicopter and walked into the ambulance. He had no animal bites and wasn’t bleeding.” Local police do admit that the area is known for its bear population, however, and the traumatized Jessee is…

Continue Reading


USPS Delivers Defiant Message to White House Regarding Vaccine Mandate

This is a slap in the face to the Biden administration.



According to the Biden administration, trouble is coming, and it will arrive in the form of another prolonged economic downturn and possible lockdowns, if we don’t somehow get this “delta” variant of COVID-19 under control. The issue, according to many medical experts, is that this mutated version of the primary coronavirus pandemic strain, is spreading too rapidly among the unvaccinated, and without a significant number of Americans suddenly deciding to get inoculated in the near future, we may not reach “herd immunity” for months. Now, in an effort to speed up the stagnating vaccination rate, President Joe Biden is set to announce that all federal workers should be vaccinated, or face a grueling COVID testing protocol that was intentionally designed to be uncomfortable. The United States Postal Service isn’t taking the news lying down, however. The influential American Postal Workers Union on Wednesday said, at this point, it opposes a coronavirus vaccine mandate from the Biden administration but encouraged workers to voluntarily take the jabs. “While the APWU leadership continues to encourage postal workers to voluntarily get vaccinated, it is not the role of the federal government to mandate vaccinations for the employees we represent,” the union said in a statement obtained by Fox News. The union did not immediately respond to an after-hours email from Fox News. The union said in the statement that the safety of its workers is “of paramount importance” but “at this time the APWU opposes the mandating of COVID-19 vaccinations.” The Biden administration’s mandate will not be 100% iron clad according to sources familiar with the matter, but, rather, would be an incredibly strong suggestion with some terribly annoying hoops to jump through to abstain.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week