If it walks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. Everybody knows that MSNBC does its audience a disservice by reporting opinion over fact. But they’re not about to let up anytime soon.

Thankfully, one woman has seen the light.

And she’s outta there!

Trending: Details: President Trump Has Just Announced His Plans for Inauguration Day

From Daily Wire:

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?

• Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

• Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?*
  • Yes
  • No
• Email*
• Email
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A former MSNBC producer wrote an open letter on Monday explaining why she left the far-left network a little over a week ago, saying that they are a “cancer” that is “stoking national division” by amplifying “fringe voices” and forcing “journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.”

The letter was written by Ariana Pekary, who Fox News noted described herself as an “integral member” of MSNBC’s “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell.”

CONTINUED:

“July 24th was my last day at MSNBC. I don’t know what I’m going to do next exactly but I simply couldn’t stay there anymore,” Pekary wrote. “My colleagues are very smart people with good intentions. The problem is the job itself. It forces skilled journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.”

Pekary said that at MSNBC it was “practically baked in to the editorial process” that decisions on what and who give coverage to were based on what would generate the most ratings for the network. She said that behind closed doors “industry leaders will admit the damage that’s being done.”

Nobody outside of Chinese leaders can be blamed for coronavirus. The communist nation was responsible for the outbreak and initially failed to alert the rest of the world before it got as bad as is.

Now, every world leader is doing their best to combat further spreading of the disease.

President Trump and his team have stepped up to the plate, advising Americans on what needs to be done. Precautions have been taken. All that’s left to do is ride out the storm. But according to this MSNBC analyst, who used to be a federal prosecutor, Trump should be charged with homicide.

LOOK:

Hey All. Can we talk about 1 of the few topics I may actually know too much about: homicide? Specifically, whether Donald Trump may have criminal exposure for some level of negligent homicide or voluntary/involuntary manslaughter for the way he’s mishandled the Coronavirus crisis

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

I spent 22 of my 30 years as a federal prosecutor handling murder cases in Washington, DC. I served as Chief of the Homicide Section at the DC US Attorney’s Office, overseeing all murder prosecutions in the city. I was always on the lookout for novel ways to apply homicide …

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

liability in an attempt to appropriately and ethically hold accountable those who were responsible for taking the life of a fellow human being. I think it’s fair to observe that there’s nothing more devestating to a family then losing a loved one to ether violent crime or to …

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

an illness that could have been prevented or mitigated. I’m trying to assimilate all available evidence (rapidly developing and being reported every day) to fairly assess whether Trump and his administration may have acted/failed to act in a way that could give rise to …

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

homicide liability. This is not an easy question. Further, whereas the evidence is clear that Trump has committed multiple criminal offenses both before his tenure as president (campaign finance crimes) & during his time as president (obstruction of justice, bribery/extortion)…

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

homicide liability by his negligent/grossly negligent (and/or possibly intentional) mishandling of the Coronavirus crisis in the US is a more nuanced and thorny issue and deserves careful consideration. But the homicide liability issue MUST be addressed because …

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

ALL criminal charges will have to be investigated and, if the evidence dictates it, prosecuted come Jan. 2021. Stay tuned … #TrumpCrimesCommission #TCC #JusticeIsComing

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) March 17, 2020

A congressional candidate agrees…

The calculation looks basically like this. The number infected would also increase as a result of Trump* in addition to the fatality rate.

But this is the base template IMHO. pic.twitter.com/0Spr1GgCRo

— Mark Judson For Congress – Scorched Earth Democrat (@Judson4Congress) March 17, 2020

REACTIONS: