;
Connect with us

News

New York Cuts 9/11 Survivors and First Responders from 20th Anniversary Events at Ground Zero

The National 9/11 Memorial and Museum announced its 20th anniversary of 9/11 program and has excluded survivors and first responders from the event.

Published

on

The National 9/11 Memorial and Museum run by leftist Michael Bloomberg has announced the program for its 20th anniversary of 9/11 and Bloomie has excluded survivors and first responders from the event.

Once again, we find that leftists never cease to hock with their ignorance and hate for America.

The press release from the National 9/11 Memorial and Museum says:

The commemoration is for family members of victims of the 2001 and 1993 attacks, and they have been invited to participate in this year’s reading of the names. The 9/11 Memorial Museum will be open solely for family members, beginning at 7 a.m.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As Townhall notes: “The loved ones of those whose lives were snuffed out 20 years ago deserve to have a venue to mourn and remember. But shouldn’t survivors from Ground Zero who worked in the towers or responded to the attack — many of whom had friends and colleagues who didn’t make it home that night — also have the chance to mourn at the site or participate in the ceremony?”

A statement from the National 9/11 Memorial and Museum released in reaction to coverage of survivors and first responders’ exclusion insisted that there is “no change from previous years” for the 20th anniversary event. The statement also pointed out that “on September 10, we provide hours of exclusive access to the Museum for members of the 9/11 Community: rescue and recovery workers, first responders, downtown residents, survivors, family members of victims and more.”

But according to first responders, they’ve been allowed to attend and take part in 9/11 anniversary ceremonies in years past.

This is pretty galling, for sure. Yes, the victims and their families take high priority. But those who responded to try and save lives deserve inclusion! Especially since many became ill from their work that day.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

News

New Peer Reviewed Paper Blasts COVID Vaccinations for Children

A new peer reviewed article reveals major questions suggesting that vaccinating kids for COVID is simply not useful.

Published

on

A new peer reviewed article (meaning other scientists approved it) reveals major questions suggesting that vaccinating kids for COVID is simply not useful.

The article published in Toxicology Reports and written by Ronald N. Kostoff, is titled “Why are we vaccinating children against Covid-19?” According to Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in the Covid vaccines, the new article is an in-depth analysis of existing data from various government sources. But it isn’t just about kids, it covers the whole response to the pandemic.

This article was peer reviewed, meaning that other scientists read it, considered the evidence, and found the paper’s conclusions to be credible. This is no half-assed “study.” It is a comprehensive look at the evidence.

Rob Jenkins of Townhall.com summarizes:

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

First, from the introduction, here’s what Kostoff, et al. have to say about the roll-out and possible impact of the vaccines: “Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term…had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power….Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases….[or] long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.”

About the “vaccines” themselves: “A vaccine is legally defined as any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of one or more diseases….A January 2000 patent application that defined vaccines as ‘compositions or mixtures that when introduced into the circulatory system of an animal will evoke a protective response to a pathogen’ was rejected by the U.S. Patent Office because ‘the immune response produced by a vaccine…must be protective….[It must be] a compound which prevents infection.’ In the remainder of this article, we use the term ‘inoculated’ rather than vaccinated, because the injected material in the present COVID-19 inoculations prevents neither viral infection nor transmission. Since its main function in practice appears to be symptom suppression, it is operationally a ‘treatment.’”

On the reported 600,000-plus Covid deaths: “Most deaths attributed to COVID-19 were elderly with high comorbidities….Attribution of death to one of many possible comorbidities or especially toxic exposures in combinations is highly arbitrary and can be viewed as a political decision more than a medical decision. For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death. These deaths with comorbidities could equally have been ascribed to any of the comorbidities. Thus, the actual number of COVID-19-based deaths in the USA may have been on the order of 35,000 or less, characteristic of a mild flu season.”

The authors conclude that there seems to be no reason to vaccinate kids for the virus.

“There appears to be modest benefit from the inoculations to the elderly population most at risk, no benefit to the younger population not at risk, and much potential for harm from the inoculations to both populations. It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted,” the authors wrote.

Like many conservatives have been pointing out for over a year, there is just no reason to vaccinate or mask children.

None.

And it’s child abuse to do so.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

A new peer reviewed article (meaning other scientists approved it) reveals major questions suggesting that vaccinating kids for COVID is simply not useful. The article published in Toxicology Reports and written by Ronald N. Kostoff, is titled “Why are we vaccinating children against Covid-19?” According to Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in the Covid vaccines, the new article is an in-depth analysis of existing data from various government sources. But it isn’t just about kids, it covers the whole response to the pandemic. This article was peer reviewed, meaning that other scientists read it, considered the evidence, and found the paper’s conclusions to be credible. This is no half-assed “study.” It is a comprehensive look at the evidence. Rob Jenkins of Townhall.com summarizes: First, from the introduction, here’s what Kostoff, et al. have to say about the roll-out and possible impact of the vaccines: “Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term…had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power….Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases….[or] long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.” About the “vaccines” themselves: “A vaccine is legally defined as any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of one or more diseases….A January 2000 patent application that defined vaccines as ‘compositions or mixtures that when introduced into the circulatory system of an animal will evoke a protective response to a pathogen’ was rejected by the U.S. Patent Office because ‘the immune response produced by a vaccine…must be protective….[It must be] a compound which prevents infection.’ In the remainder of this article, we use the term ‘inoculated’ rather than vaccinated,…

Continue Reading

News

SEE IT: Amtrak Train Derails in Montana, Killing Several and Injuring Dozens

Investigators still don’t know what caused the derailment.

Published

on

In a cruel twist of irony, the end of Rail Safety Week was marred by tragedy in Montana on Saturday, as an Amtrak passenger train careened of the tracks in Montana, perplexing investigators.

The incident caused a vast majority of the 10-car train to derail, injuring dozens and killing at least three people.

Amtrak joined federal safety officials Sunday to investigate a Montana train derailment that left at least three people dead, seven people hospitalized and rural communities scrambling to provide food and shelter to the stunned survivors.

The westbound Empire Builder train with 141 passengers and 17 crew members derailed Saturday afternoon near Joplin, a town of less than 200 people a few miles from the Canadian border in Liberty County. The tragedy occurred as Amtrak was closing out its nationwide, annual Rail Safety Week.

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The NTSB is launching a go-team to investigate Saturday’s derailment of Amtrak’s Empire Builder train,” the National Transportation Safety Board said on Twitter, adding that the team would be based in Great Falls, Montana.

Images of the carnage were soon trending on social media.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those involved.

In a cruel twist of irony, the end of Rail Safety Week was marred by tragedy in Montana on Saturday, as an Amtrak passenger train careened of the tracks in Montana, perplexing investigators. The incident caused a vast majority of the 10-car train to derail, injuring dozens and killing at least three people. Amtrak joined federal safety officials Sunday to investigate a Montana train derailment that left at least three people dead, seven people hospitalized and rural communities scrambling to provide food and shelter to the stunned survivors. The westbound Empire Builder train with 141 passengers and 17 crew members derailed Saturday afternoon near Joplin, a town of less than 200 people a few miles from the Canadian border in Liberty County. The tragedy occurred as Amtrak was closing out its nationwide, annual Rail Safety Week. “The NTSB is launching a go-team to investigate Saturday’s derailment of Amtrak’s Empire Builder train,” the National Transportation Safety Board said on Twitter, adding that the team would be based in Great Falls, Montana. Images of the carnage were soon trending on social media. https://twitter.com/newsbyjessica/status/1441904036437954563?s=20 https://twitter.com/AP/status/1441942622449192961?s=20 https://twitter.com/ThisIsMarietta/status/1441946955781869569?s=20 https://twitter.com/IntelPointAlert/status/1441941735026876418?s=20 Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those involved.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week