Connect with us

News

NY Times Makes Shocking Confession Revealing Why Liberals Refuse to Call Out Anti-Semitsim

Whoa.

Published

on

A new piece published in the Wednesday edition of the New York Times tackled the subject matter of anti-Semitism in the Big Apple, finally admitting the real reason why liberals never call out this heinous act of discrimination.

The story itself noted some points that seem to have faded into the background over the last few years, such as Jews being the most targeted group of individuals in New York.

Contrary to what are surely the prevailing assumptions, anti-Semitic incidents have constituted half of all hate crimes in New York this year, according to the Police Department. To put that figure in context, there have been four times as many crimes motivated by bias against Jews — 142 in all — as there have against blacks. Hate crimes against Jews have outnumbered hate crimes targeted at transgender people by a factor of 20.

Trending: ‘Give Us Your Home!’ BLM Demands Homeowners ‘Give Black People Back Their Homes’

The Times admits that the Left has routinely ignored anti-Semitism in the city thanks to its inability to formulate a narrative blaming the Right. The Times explains:

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

If anti-Semitism bypasses consideration as a serious problem in New York, it is to some extent because it refuses to conform to an easy narrative with a single ideological enemy.

Now, why wouldn’t you cover a spate of anti-Semitism coming from a variety of different groups? Only for political reasons, as the Times then admits:

In fact, it is the varied backgrounds of people who commit hate crimes in the city that make combating and talking about anti-Semitism in New York much harder….bias stemming from longstanding ethnic tensions in the city presents complexities that many liberals have chosen simply to ignore….When a Hasidic man or woman is attacked by anyone in New York City, mainstream progressive advocacy groups do not typically send out emails calling for concern and fellowship and candlelight vigils in Union Square, as they often do when individuals are harmed in New York because of their race or ethnicity or how they identify in terms of gender or sexual orientation.

In other words, Jews don’t fit the intersectional classification necessary in order to receive narrative attention from either the mainstream media or from progressive groups. Orthodox Jews, who are often the targets of anti-Semitic attacks, aren’t seen as victims; their victimizers, who aren’t conservatives and who can’t be linked with conservatives, aren’t seen as victimizers. There’s a reason Al Sharpton, who helped initiate a riot against Orthodox Jews in Crown Heights in 1991, has a show on MSNBC where he opines about President Trump’s linkages to white supremacist anti-Semitism. Certain types of anti-Semitism are worthy of note. Others aren’t. And those on the Left often decide which is which with simple reference to a preferred narrative in which Jews are part of the white privileged class, unless they are victimized by white supremacists.

There are a lot of different places that anti-Semitism can spring from, as human history has woefully and painfully demonstrated to us as it has unfolded. You don’t have to be a neo-Nazi. Plenty of other groups despise the Jews, including radical Muslims, progressives who have beef with Israel, and folks who are racist against minorities.

Let’s hope for a better day one day when people won’t be killed or maimed simply because of the traditions and values we hold.

Source: Daily Wire

Save conservative media!

News

Biden & Harris Refuse to Answer Questions From the Press — For Third Day In A Row (Video)

They must not have anything to say to the American people…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Donald Trump picked Mike Pence to be his vice presidential running mate in 2016 because the man was the chief executive of a state. Pence had gubernatorial experience, as well as a past in the lower chamber of Congress. Joe Biden, on the other hand, chose Kamala Harris to be his VP running mate because of the color of her skin. That’s literally the only reason. It was a purely political move, as the Biden camp knows they can call everyone racist if they say something negative about Harris – and the media will back them up. But Joe and Commiela had better be careful. If they continue to sidestep even liberal reporters, said liberal reporters are likely to become salty. WATCH: https://twitter.com/KLF/status/1294356550761549824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294356550761549824%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F Biden is now apparently for defunding law enforcement after many of his radical left-wing peers called for the move weeks ago. From Fox News: Joe Biden said in an interview Wednesday that some funding should “absolutely” be redirected from police, amid calls from some in his party to “defund the police” in the wake of the protests across the country. Biden’s campaign has said he does not support defunding the police. But in a Now This interview with activist Ady Barkan, the presumptive Democratic nominee said that police forces don’t need surplus military equipment, saying this is what leads them to “become the enemy” in a community. WATCH: https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1280904345408745472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280904345408745472%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F Here’s a longer version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppoUCQLSXFE&feature=emb_title WATCH: https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1280907262333087745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280907262333087745%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F

Continue Reading

News

Bill Barr: There Will Be ‘Significant Developments’ In Durham Probe Before November Election

It’s about time!

John Salvatore

Published

on

The Durham probe will leave yet another stain on Barack Obama’s record, showing how inept and corrupt the 44th president’s administration truly was. And it’s about time something got done. The left won’t pay much attention to this story, because they know they don’t want to know. You feel me? WATCH: https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1294086122558062592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294086122558062592%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fag-barr-says-there-will-be-significant-developments-in-durham-case-before-the-election%2F More from Fox News: Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, two sources close to the matter tell Fox News. Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation. Specifically, the inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was “not a source” for another government agency. Page has said he was a source for the CIA. The DOJ relied on that assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Keep America Great!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

No articles were found at this time.

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend