Linkedin Share
Opinion

Obama-Appointed Judge Drops Russia Collusion BOMB After Sentencing Manafort

Linkedin Share

Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was just sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence by a judge appointed by former President Barack Obama.

Here are the details…

Breaking: MANAFORT sentenced to serve 43 more months in prison *on top of* the 47 months from his other sentence.

Total of 7 1/2 years in prison for felonies uncovered as part of Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference, per @business.

Trending:
Massive Migrant Caravan Marches Toward US with LGBT Flags Flying as Mexican President Snubs Biden at Summit

However, what many people will find most interesting is what Amy Berman Jackson had to say about possible Russia collusion.

Long story short? There was none.

https://twitter.com/TheDaleJackson/status/1105852963124404225?%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1105852963124404225&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthefederalistpapers.org%2Fopinion%2Fobama-appointed-judge-sentences-manafort-say-no-russian-collusion-case

WATCH:

California Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters says Russia sent Paul Manafort to the Trump campaign, then admits she has zero evidence.

What kind of sorcery is this?

WATCH:

Related:
Lake Lanier Trends on Twitter After 'Haunted' Spot Claims Another Victim

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is back on the Russia-train, too:

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson explains how the FBI opened an investigation in 2017 to learn if President Trump was “secretly a Russian agent.”

You couldn’t make this up.

WATCH:

Conservative rock star Mark Levin, lawyer and radio host, explains the legal consequences President Trump could be facing.

Hint: sorry liberals.

Listen:

https://soundcloud.com/conservativereview/levin-shouldnt-we-be-cheering-that-the-president-is-guilty-of-nothing

People keep saying, ‘What are the legal implications for Trump?’ There are none. Zero. There’s no legal implication; there’s no legal jeopardy, period. Moreover, in all this so-called reporting and analysis by these phony experts, where did President Trump collude, coordinate, or conspire with the Russians during the election, to fix the result of the election? Where is this evidence? And since there’s not a scintilla of evidence, this should underscore the point that this entire investigation is bogus.

Shouldn’t [the media] be cheering over the fact that so far, all the leaks show that Trump did nothing? Shouldn’t they be celebrating that, that in our republic, the president that we chose is guilty of nothing? That he didn’t collaborate, he didn’t coordinate, he didn’t conspire with the Russians? But they’re not. They keep bringing in these phony experts, who are utterly predictable. ‘You know, uh, if I were Don Jr., I’d be worried about now’ — the country should be worried about now, about what’s taking place. The country should be worried.”

[…]

How many more damn times do I have to explain that it is the position of the United States Department of Justice that you cannot indict a sitting president? He’s not in any kind of legal jeopardy.

Submit a Correction →



Tags:
, , ,
Linkedin Share
About the Author:
John Salvatore has been a Writer and Editor of multiple political blogs since early 2015. He earned his Master’s degree in Public Administration upon completion of a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science. A diehard Los Angeles Dodgers fan, John can be reached at [email protected].




Conversation