Connect with us

News

Ocasio-Cortez Complains About Having Government Health Care, Calls for ‘Medicare for All’

So you’re saying Obamacare was a bad idea?

John Salvatore

Published

on

If duh had a baby with LOL, their offspring would result in the birth of New York freshman Democrat Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Well, that’s assuming duh and LOL didn’t have an abortion, obviously!

Once again, AOC fails to make her point while arguing in favor of the conservative view. She does this often. That’s the problem with liberals. They are stubborn.

See for yourself…

Trending: Tokyo Woke No Mo’: IOC Bans BLM Apparel for Olympics

From Daily Wire:

take our poll - story continues below

Did Derek Chauvin Receive Proper Due Process?

  • Did Derek Chauvin Receive Proper Due Process?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) complained about being on government healthcare on Sunday, saying that there were too many options available for her to deal with the “complex financial products.”

Her tweets:

Members of Congress also have to buy their plans off the exchange. They are Gold plans that are partially subsidized.

That means I get to “choose” btwn 66 complex financial products.

This is absurd. No person should go without healthcare, &no one should go through this, either.

While I am VERY thankful to finally have health insurance, it is a moral outrage that it took me *getting elected to Congress* for that to happen.

The US needs to become an advanced society. That includes establishing healthcare as a right to all people.

And as someone who has now experienced many parts of the insurance spectrum (being uninsured, underinsured, and adequately insured) I don’t see how anyone can think our current healthcare system only needs a 10% improvement or a just few tweaks.

We need #MedicareForAll.

And once again, make sure to get insured if you can at http://healthcare.gov

Yes, it’s a pain. But it is worth it.

I know some folks are bristling at the fact that I am pointing that out, but we have to acknowledge the reality so we can move forward together.

During a speech in New Hampshire, 2020 Democrat Socialist presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who is backed by AOC, told his fans how he plans to not only ruin their lives but the lives of every single person in America – legal or illegal.

Bernie noted, “What we will do is have a 4% tax on income exempting the first $29,000.” He then added, “You’re better at arithmetic than I am. Because what that means is if you are that average family in the middle who makes $60,000 a year, that means we’re gonna tax you on $31,000 at 4%.

The more Bernie talks, the more likely voters are to flock to President Trump next November.

WATCH:

At the end of the day, is a man who recently suffered a heart attack physically fit to deal with the rigors of being president of the United States on a day-to-day basis? The answer should be obvious.

Nope.

Bernie’s heart failing him is a lot like Hillary Clinton’s fainting spells back in 2016. Both instances showed the nation that neither far-left radical was prepared to handle the duties of office.

News

Social Media Giant Permanently Banishes Pro-Life News Outlet

So much for free speech.

Published

on

1984

Our nation appears destined to fall into the clutches of a technological oligarchy, headed by the likes of Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg, and there is very little that can be done about it. These two men, who run Twitter and Facebook, respectively, have been ruling their public forums with an iron fist, hiding behind the concept that their private status is a workaround for the First Amendment.  Their gargantuan reach and influence has made it possible for them to act with impunity, steering the narrative on any number of subjects, from Donald Trump to the wonder of maternity. The latest affront to free speech comes to us from Facebook, where a pro-life news organization has been completely banished. Facebook permanently banned LifeSiteNews, a popular pro-life news outlet, for publishing “false information about COVID-19 that could contribute to physical harm.” As justification for unpublishing LifeSiteNews, Facebook cited an article posted on April 10, 2021, titled “COVID vaccines can be deadly for some.” Facebook said they erase Facebook pages that publish “vaccine discouraging information on the platform.” The site’s staff was livid. “This all comes down to another case of Big Tech silencing free speech on their platform,” said LifeSiteNews Marketing Director Rebekah Roberts. “Facebook has been silencing any voice that goes against their beliefs and agenda,” Roberts said. “Our LifeSiteNews Facebook page has been removed simply because we have shared reports of doctors, nurses, expert researchers, and even the former Pfizer VP speaking out against the COVID shots.” This is just the latest in a long line of Orwellian moves by these social media mavens, and may in fact be just another harbinger of something far more sinister to come.

Continue Reading

News

CDC Readies Cruises, Complete with Human Guinea Pigs

Fingers crossed!

Published

on

As the world prepares for its grand reopening, there are a number of high value industries that are eagerly awaiting permission from medical authorities to resume operations. First and foremost, there are the service industries:  Places like restaurants, bars, music venues, and sports arenas whose entire livelihood depends on whether or not people are being allowed to gather in public.  While many of these venues are now beginning to ramp up their capacity, there are issues bringing some of these workers back into the fold thanks to the enhanced unemployment benefits provided by the federal government. And then there’s the tourism industry, whose regulatory structure is far more susceptible to interference by government agencies. Now, after over a year of stagnation, it appears as though at least one facet of this wide-ranging corporate amalgam will be given a chance to sail on. Cruise lines can soon begin trial voyages in U.S. waters with volunteer passengers helping test whether the ships can sail safely during a pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gave ship operators final technical guidelines Wednesday for the trial runs. The CDC action is a step toward resuming cruises in U.S. waters, possibly by July, for the first time since March 2020. A spokeswoman for the cruise industry’s trade group said the group was reviewing the CDC instructions. So, how will this work? Each practice cruise — they’ll run two to seven days — must have enough passengers to meet at least 10% of the ship’s capacity. Volunteers must be 18 or older and either fully vaccinated or free of medical conditions that would put them at high risk for severe COVID-19. The ship operator must tell passengers that they are simulating untested safety measures “and that sailing during a pandemic is an inherently risky activity,” the…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week