One of the best compilations of reasons to doubt the wild accusations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford has been turned in by Paul Sperry.
For those looking for a one-stop article for some of the best reasons to assume that Ford is a giant liar, Sperry turns in a doozie. Indeed, according to Sperry, Ford’s “story is also growing less believable by the day.”
Sperry’s points were recently laid out in a piece published by the New York Post. In it he notes that the number one problem with her claims is that Ford can’t really remember ANY of the pertinent details of the attack she supposedly suffered at the hands of a teenaged Brett Kavanaugh.
Indeed, Ford has admitted that she does not remember WHERE the attack happened, nor does she remember exactly WHEN it happened (only that *maybe* it was in the year 1982), nor can she clearly remember WHO was in the room at the time (she has had various stories about that latter point). Those sure all seem like important details that any true victim might remember.
Next, Ford admits that never until she was in her late forties did she tell anyone about this supposed attack. So she has no witnesses who can attest that they heard about the attack when it supposedly happened 35 years ago.
Also, the four “witnesses” Ford variously says were either in the room or at the “party” when it happened all failed to back up her claim. All four have come forward to say they do NOT recall any such incident.
Sperry also wonders why Ford’s own family has remained utterly silent about all this. I mentioned that myself just this week. It turns out that a growing list of left-wingers have raced to come to Ford’s support, but her own siblings and parents have not said a word in public to support her. This speaks volumes about her veracity.
Sperry also pointed out that Ford’s liberal supporters keep claiming that the supposed “notes” from the woman’s therapist prove that she was dealing with the attack back in 2012. But those notes do not name Kavanaugh, so it is a but hard to understand how it took another six years for Ford to suddenly “remember” it was Kavanaugh who attacked her.
Ford also lied when she said Trump upset her over his addition of Kavanaugh to his short list for a possible court appointment.
“In another inconsistency,” Sperry wrote, “Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.”
Indeed, that latter point seems to prove that Ford is acting as a political hatchet man, doesn’t it?
In any case, go read all of Sperry’s points because his article will help you refute the liberals in your life.
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.