Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Poll Worker Says Voter Couldn’t Wear Trump Shirt, So Here’s What He Did (Photos)

Classic!

John Salvatore

Published

on

A South Carolina man wore a pro-Trump t-shirt to vote on Tuesday.

He was told he couldn’t vote in the shirt.

Apparently, the Palmetto State has rules against this sort of thing (more on that below).

Trending: WATCH: Anti-Trump Fox News Host Throws Hissy Fit After Mueller Report Vindicates Trump

So, the man decided to take action.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?

  • Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

He voted shirtless!

Here’s the explanation…

From WIS TV:

In South Carolina, you’re not allowed to distribute any campaign material within 200 feet of the polling place, and that includes clothing, according to state elections officials.

At the Murrells Inlet/Garden City Fire Department polling location, a man wearing a shirt supporting President Trump was told he couldn’t wear the clothing inside the polling place, according to witness Todd Price. So instead, the man took it off and voted shirtless, Price said.

Chris Whitmire, with the South Carolina Elections Commission, said via email the poll manager’s handbook defines campaign material as any written or visual material that expresses support or opposition for any candidate, party or ballot issue in a current election.

12,000 Trump-supporting American patriots were inside the arena in Chattanooga, Tennessee days before the election.

They were loud.

A lot more supporters couldn’t get in because the place was filled to capacity, as is generally the case when Trump is campaigning.

Here’s the view from inside:

And outside:

Check out the left’s response, where some people felt it necessary to kneel for (and denigrate) the national anthem:

https://twitter.com/CaliConsrvative/status/1059328163581321217?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1059328163581321217&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F

Another:

These types of actions are why the GOP gained members of the Senate.

Trump’s rally for Senate candidate Josh Hawley in Missouri on Thursday was attended by 27,000 supporters.

It was 50 degrees outside in Columbia and drizzling.

Nobody seemed to care.

https://twitter.com/Golfinggary5222/status/1058121407924703233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1058121407924703233&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2018%2F11%2Ftrump-gets-27000-in-50-and-drizzle-in-a-cornfield-obama-cant-fill-a-high-school-gym-at-room-temp%2F

While in Milwaukee, Obama spoke at a high school gymnasium.

As you can see, the place is half-full:

A reporter claimed the line to see Obama was a mile long:

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Beto Seemingly Calls for WAR Over Mueller Report Secrecy

The left just had to find some way to make the idea of transparency seem sensational, didn’t they?

Published

on

Beto O'Rourke

As the nation patiently awaits the findings of the Special Counsel report, a debate is raging. On both sides of the aisle, we are hearing that transparency is key.  Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General and self-proclaimed “heat shield” for Robert Mueller, has expressed his concerns over tarnishing the reputations of those not accused of a crime. The rest of America seems fairly well convinced, and rightly so, that there should be unfettered access to the report. And while this is undoubtedly a widely felt sentiment, the radical left just had to find a way to make it seem sensational. Cue 2020 presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke: “Republicans and Democrats should do whatever they can to make sure their constituents, the American people, can read that report, form their own judgement, make their own decisions, and that the truth comes out,” O’Rourke said at a campaign stop in South Carolina Friday. O’Rourke warned that America may not see another year if details of Russian interference in the 2016 election included in the Mueller report are not made public, saying, “This is an unprecedented attack on this country and on our democracy, and we are owed the facts. And if we do not receive them, 243 years in, there’s nothing that guarantees us a 244th.” O’Rourke is undoubtedly suggesting that a Civil War or revolution could take place over something that everyone already wants. Not only have a number of democrats parroted the “everyone should get to see everything” line, but they’ve done so in complete agreement with Trump-appointed Attorney General Bill Barr. For Beto to go nuclear in this statement is beyond bizarre, and sounds more like a coaxed soundbite than his true sentiment on the subject.

Continue Reading

News

Mueller Report Findings Expected by Congress Sunday

Monday morning’s water cooler chit chat has already been decided.

Published

on

russiagate

Is our long national nightmare actually over?  Well, that depends on who you ask today. For many, the completion of the Mueller report on Friday, without any additional indictments being suggest by the Special Counsel, was a huge win for President Trump.  It meant that there wasn’t evidence sufficient to bring charges against the President…perhaps. We should remember that the DOJ’s longstanding belief was that a sitting President could not be indicted. On the left side of the aisle, however, a tense wait has begun, with the Attorney General expected to hand off a summation of Mueller’s findings to Congress any minute. Attorney General William Barr was expected to release his first summary of Mueller’s findings on Sunday, people familiar with the process said, on what lawmakers anticipated could be a day of reckoning in the two-year probe into President Donald Trump and Russian efforts to elect him. Since receiving the report Friday, Barr has been deciding how much of it Congress and the public will see. Of course, for some democrats, this simply wouldn’t cut it. “I suspect that we’ll find those words of transparency to prove hollow, that in fact they will fight to make sure that Congress doesn’t get this underlying evidence,” Rep. Adam Schiff of California, chairman of the House intelligence committee, said on ABC’s “This Week.” His plan: Ask for information and if that’s denied, “subpoena. If subpoenas are denied, we will haul people before the Congress. And yes, we will prosecute in court as necessary to get this information.” For now, we will just wait and see. We do know one thing for certain:  Monday morning around the water coolor is going to be a happenin’ spot.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend