Connect with us

Opinion

President Trump, If I May Suggest — A Detailed Opinion About the Coronavirus

Well thought out…

Published

on

President Trump, you have enormous resources at your disposal, but perhaps some of your staff may have missed these suggestions. Following the outbreak of the coronavirus, Americans were outraged when they found out that 95% of the prescription drugs we take in America are made in China. Having one country control 95% of something we need is a definitive national security issue. It’s reassuring to see that the president signed an executive order to end reliance on China in the medical supply chain, but that is only the start. 

I agree with that decision; we need to bring back the production of our own pharma and medical supplies to the United States. Building a new supply chain infrastructure will bring new good-paying jobs. I also would recommend a development grant program that utilizes the concept of economic development zones all across the country. This would help to build manufacturing companies that will, as quickly as possible, replace China as a medical supplier. 

I would like to see you establish a pharma and medical supplies facility in Puerto Rico. In the past, this island was an essential part of the pharmaceutical manufacturing process, but because of two hurricanes, factories have never been rebuilt. I know it will take time to build out this infrastructure, but we need to start now. I’m reminded of our dependency in the past to foreign oil countries in order to run our economy and what happened when they turned off the spigot. We are now energy independent and no longer need Middle East oil to run our economy, and OPEC no longer has power over us. However, with the Chinese dominance in the drug industry, they can turn off the switch to us at any time. 

But Mr. President, there is more. I believe that you need to appoint a cabinet-level task force to look at what we import from China from other sectors of our economy and how much control China has upon our supply chain and possibly be a national security risk. We must find out how exposed we are to potential supply chain interruptions. We should use the new economic empowerment zones I have suggested to bring those jobs back to the United States.  

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Concerning the coronavirus, I think there is a great deal of confusion in the numbers of people sick or dying from the virus. Because of these uncertainties, this has resulted in a significant decline of the stock market and significant losses in people’s retirement and investment accounts. As of this writing, the Dow-Jones has dropped from 28,5000 as of December 31, 2019, to 20,340 or a decline of almost 29%. 

One of the questions being asked by many is what will happen to the economy? Also, what will happen to employment with so many businesses being closed? People in the financial industry are making predictions, much like the medical professionals about the virus outcome. I believe that I have an indicator that everyone can follow with ease to get an indication of the economy’s direction going forward. 

Before the virus broke out, America had a meager unemployment rate of about 3.6%, and at the same time, over 7 million job openings. Here is something we all can watch every Thursday to see what is happening on the job front. The U.S. Department of Labor publishes the Weekly Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report. (Click on the link to the left and download the weekly report.)  

On the week ending March 7, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 211,000 persons, a decrease of 4,000 from the previous week’s revised level. The previous week’s level was revised down by 1,000 from 216,000 to 215,000. The 4-week moving average was 214,000, an increase of 1,250 from the previous week’s revised average. 

There is much more information on the site, but what is essential is for each week to check the number and then look at the 4 weeks moving average so you can see a trend. I would expect to see an increase in claims over the next 4 to 6 weeks. We will have the unemployment report for March on April 3. At that time we may see the rise of the unemployment rate and the decline in jobs created. 

One thing to keep in mind is that many of the jobs being shut down from places such as schools, colleges, and universities are protected because people have employment contracts. More and more companies are encouraging people to work from home. The most significant impact will be the hourly workers, but they will have some income from unemployment benefits.  

A critical perspective, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, is that the United States has had 1,663 confirmed cases from the covid-19 virus with 40 deaths. The report goes on to show that 31 of the 40 deaths were at one facility in Seattle, Washington. This means that 9 deaths are attributed to the other 49 states. Based on 1,663 confirmed cases and 40 deaths, the death rate 2.50%, but this rate is from a relatively small population.

It is possible as we get more test kits, more people will be confirmed to have the virus, but it doesn’t mean that as more people are identified with the virus that the death rate will go up. The actual death rate percentage may decline with more data.  

We seem to be ignoring the fact that cancer kills 600,000 people a year, while the flu is ranked 7th, and it kills as many as 56,000 people per year. We have panicked, and I believe a great deal of the blame for the panic rests in the hands of the American mainstream media. Real Clear Politics made the following observation on its blog of March 2, “Most importantly, the strong association of coronavirus coverage with Donald Trump in the U.S. and the economy globally suggests the outbreak is being contextualized as a political and economic story — delivering a dose of panic in the process — rather than a public health emergency that requires clinical and dispassionate reporting.”

Please wash your hands every time you cough or sneeze in them and take care of each other. And Mr. President, you know what to do. 

Dan Perkins is a nationally syndicated radio and TV talk show host. He is heard in over 1400 markets in the United States and is broadcast in 193 nations around the world. He is a current events commentator who contributes to over 20 blogs across America. His latest radio program is Americas Cannabis Conversation broadcast over the AM/FM radio network and the Global Entertainment Network and all the major Pod cast networks. More information about Dan Perkins can be found on his website Danperkins.guru.

News

WOKE JOKE: Mag Ripped for Declaring Phrase ‘Invasive Species’ Problematic

The breadth of the American vocabulary is shrinking, and this is a shame that is fully owned by the radical left. 

Published

on

How far is too far these days?  Are we ever going to hit the bottom of the barrel when it comes to wokeness?  Is there a bottom?

It may only be months before activists start declaring that we rename entire cities on account of some extrapolation in the orbit of their name.  This is heading down a path that leads us to darkness – where the real evil, the really vile ideologies of our nation are so well-hidden that they mutate and grow and fester.  They’ll be so far removed from society that it will appear as though they are on another planet, and they will be plotting and preparing in an effort to shatter the phony, whitewashed facade of society once again. And, because they were allowed to work in secret, there’s no telling what they’re bringing to the fight now.

Yet still, the liberal left is pushing to bury our words and paint a thin veneer of care over our entire vernacular. Their latest campaign is downright laughable.

Left-wing news website Vox published an article this week that claimed it was time to stop demonizing “invasive” species, arguing that the ongoing use of the term divided life on Earth, including people, between native and non-native.

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In the Sunday piece, freelance journalist Marina Bolotnikova blamed climate change for the forced migration of certain species, criticized measures taken by some governments to terminate those species, likened their treatment to the experiences of immigrants and suggested the term “invasive” wasn’t appropriate to describe the migrating groups.

“Ecologists expect climate change to create mass alterations in the habitats of these ‘range-shifting’ or ‘climate-tracking’ species, as they’re sometimes called, which will reshuffle ecosystems in ways that are hard to predict. The migrations are critical to species’ ability to survive hotter temperatures,” Bolotnikova wrote, citing instances of dark unicorn snails migrating from Mexico to California as an example.

Then arrived the sheer lunacy:

She later referred to conservationist efforts in North Carolina to prevent coyotes from mating with endangered red wolves as bearing “uncomfortable parallels to Western preoccupations with racial purity.”

“That’s why some scientists look askance at the influence of invasion biology and argue that the field has a baked-in, nativist bias on documenting negative consequences of introduced species and preserving nature as it is,” she wrote.

“What’s more, the very notion of ‘invasion’ draws on a war metaphor, and media narratives about non-native species are remarkably similar to those describing enemy armies or immigrants,” Bolotnikova added before citing a news story that referred to armadillos “besieging” North Carolina as “pests” and “freakish.”

The breadth of the American vocabulary is shrinking, and this is a shame that is fully worn by the radical left.

How far is too far these days?  Are we ever going to hit the bottom of the barrel when it comes to wokeness?  Is there a bottom? It may only be months before activists start declaring that we rename entire cities on account of some extrapolation in the orbit of their name.  This is heading down a path that leads us to darkness – where the real evil, the really vile ideologies of our nation are so well-hidden that they mutate and grow and fester.  They’ll be so far removed from society that it will appear as though they are on another planet, and they will be plotting and preparing in an effort to shatter the phony, whitewashed facade of society once again. And, because they were allowed to work in secret, there’s no telling what they’re bringing to the fight now. Yet still, the liberal left is pushing to bury our words and paint a thin veneer of care over our entire vernacular. Their latest campaign is downright laughable. Left-wing news website Vox published an article this week that claimed it was time to stop demonizing “invasive” species, arguing that the ongoing use of the term divided life on Earth, including people, between native and non-native. In the Sunday piece, freelance journalist Marina Bolotnikova blamed climate change for the forced migration of certain species, criticized measures taken by some governments to terminate those species, likened their treatment to the experiences of immigrants and suggested the term “invasive” wasn’t appropriate to describe the migrating groups. “Ecologists expect climate change to create mass alterations in the habitats of these ‘range-shifting’ or ‘climate-tracking’ species, as they’re sometimes called, which will reshuffle ecosystems in ways that are hard to predict. The migrations are critical to species’ ability to survive hotter temperatures,” Bolotnikova wrote, citing instances…

Continue Reading

News

Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Reveals Donald Trump’s Trips on ‘Lolita Express’

WHOA!

Published

on

For years, nay, decades, rumors have persisted about just what sort of evil empire Jeffrey Epstein was sitting on the throne of.

Sure, there were the widely-accepted truths:  Epstein was plucking underage women from corners of society and grooming them to be sex slaves.  This much is very much undisputed.

Where it gets tricky is his little black book.  You see, Epstein was wildly influential as well, not only for his vast fortune but for the possibility that he had secretly videotaped his well-known clients fornicating with said children.  This sort of kompromat is worth its weight in gold.

And among all these rumors was the plane.

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Dubbed the “Lolita Express” for all of the sexually-charged reasons that one could suggest, its flight log read like a who’s who of modern high society.

Now, in the trial of Epstein’s #2 in command, Ghislaine Maxwell, a revelation has arrived about former President Donald Trump.

DONALD Trump, Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton all flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, the paedo’s former pilot told the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

The two former US Presidents and the Duke of York were mentioned as Maxwell faces six charges of sex trafficking and abuse over her alleged role as Epstein’s “madam”.

And he was sure:

Lawrence Visoski, who is testifying for the prosecution, was quizzed during cross examination about passengers aboard Epstein’s distinctive Gulf Stream plane.

He confirmed Trump, Andrew and Clinton all flew on the jet – along with other big names such as Hollywood stars Kevin Spacey & Chris Tucker, violinist Itzhak Perlman, and US Senators John Glenn & George Mitchell.

And he also told the court he never saw any sexual activity on the flight, or any underage girls without their parents.

Epstein is long known to have courted the rich and famous as he hid in plain sight – including with flights on his plane.

“I certainly remember President Trump, but not many people associated with him,” the pilot told the trial.

While Trump’s acquaintance with Epstein was long known, the fact that this pilot puts him on the “Lolita Express” is what’s noteworthy here.

For years, nay, decades, rumors have persisted about just what sort of evil empire Jeffrey Epstein was sitting on the throne of. Sure, there were the widely-accepted truths:  Epstein was plucking underage women from corners of society and grooming them to be sex slaves.  This much is very much undisputed. Where it gets tricky is his little black book.  You see, Epstein was wildly influential as well, not only for his vast fortune but for the possibility that he had secretly videotaped his well-known clients fornicating with said children.  This sort of kompromat is worth its weight in gold. And among all these rumors was the plane. Dubbed the “Lolita Express” for all of the sexually-charged reasons that one could suggest, its flight log read like a who’s who of modern high society. Now, in the trial of Epstein’s #2 in command, Ghislaine Maxwell, a revelation has arrived about former President Donald Trump. DONALD Trump, Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton all flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, the paedo’s former pilot told the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The two former US Presidents and the Duke of York were mentioned as Maxwell faces six charges of sex trafficking and abuse over her alleged role as Epstein’s “madam”. And he was sure: Lawrence Visoski, who is testifying for the prosecution, was quizzed during cross examination about passengers aboard Epstein’s distinctive Gulf Stream plane. He confirmed Trump, Andrew and Clinton all flew on the jet – along with other big names such as Hollywood stars Kevin Spacey & Chris Tucker, violinist Itzhak Perlman, and US Senators John Glenn & George Mitchell. And he also told the court he never saw any sexual activity on the flight, or any underage girls without their parents. Epstein is long known to have courted the rich and famous as he hid in plain sight…

Continue Reading
The Schaftlein Report

Latest Articles

Best of the Week