Connect with us

News

Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Looking to Move to America, But Not Until Trump Is Gone

Not a fan of winning?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Prince Harry shocked the world when he proposed to divorced American actress, Meghan Markle. But that was years ago. Today, Britain is reeling after learning that the couple have decided to step away from their roles as senior members of the royal family in order to do their own thing.

Harry and Meghan have said they’ll split their time in England and Canada for the foreseeable future, with an eventual move to the United States being the main goal. But the pair won’t be coming to America anytime soon.

Here’s why, via Daily Mail:

Trending: BLM Goes Into Target, Demands the Store Stop Calling Police On Black Shoplifters (Videos)

Harry and Meghan may settle in the US eventually – but not while President Donald Trump is in charge.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Friends have told the Daily Mail that while the couple plan to live in Canada at first – although probably not on Vancouver Island – their ultimate aim is to have a home and business in Los Angeles.

[…]

In 2016, before she met Harry, Meghan called Mr Trump ‘divisive’ and ‘misogynistic’. She pledged to vote for his presidential rival Hillary Clinton and threatened to move to Canada if he won.

Check out some of these body language videos…

Trump never called Markle “nasty.” CNN just wants their uninformed viewers to believe he did. In reality, 45 said Meghan’s comments about him being a misogynist and divisive were “nasty.”

WATCH:

Here’s another misleading tweet:

Trump called Meghan Markle “nasty” right before his upcoming travel to the UK. This coming from the same disgusting dude who also said he “could have” had sex with Princess Diana, only if she passed an HIV test. This was only months after she died. Trump is a gross disgrace.

WATCH:

Save conservative media!

News

ICYMI: Biden Refers to Cops As the ‘Enemy’ & Now Supports Cutting Police Funding

Unreal, man!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Nobody plays follow the leader better than a Democrat politician. If a lefty calls for X, the next has to call for X plus one. It’s a snowball effect. Joe Biden is now apparently for defunding law enforcement after many of his radical left-wing peers called for the move weeks ago. From Fox News: Joe Biden said in an interview Wednesday that some funding should “absolutely” be redirected from police, amid calls from some in his party to “defund the police” in the wake of the protests across the country. Biden’s campaign has said he does not support defunding the police. But in a Now This interview with activist Ady Barkan, the presumptive Democratic nominee said that police forces don’t need surplus military equipment, saying this is what leads them to “become the enemy” in a community. WATCH: https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1280904345408745472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280904345408745472%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F Here’s a longer version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppoUCQLSXFE&feature=emb_title WATCH: https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1280907262333087745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280907262333087745%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F H/T: Right Scoop

Continue Reading

News

Democrat Senators Refuse To Comment On Removal Of George Washington Statues

Published

on

The Daily Caller recently reached out to the offices of every single Democratic senator to find out what they thought of the notion of tearing down George Washington statues, a move that would be consistent with their support of the removal of other works of art and monuments that Black Lives Matter and other radical leftists claim offend someone. Every single one of them refused to comment. That’s telling, isn’t it? Check out more of the details from The Washington Examiner: One senator, Tammy Duckworth from Illinois, recently said she supports a conversation on removing such statues. “He should be talking about what we’re going to do to overcome this pandemic,” Duckworth said of President Trump during a CNN interview earlier in July. “What are we going to do to push Russia back? Instead, he had no time for that. He spent all his time talking about dead traitors.” She added during the interview, “I think we should listen to the argument there. But remember that the president at Mount Rushmore was standing on ground that was stolen from Native Americans who had actually been given that land during a treaty.” What this really comes down to is the fact the left wants to sanitize the history of the United States and supplant the truth with their own revisionist version of events in order to help support their own progressive principles to further brainwash future generations of young people into being loyal to the state and the values it espouses. The reality is, we need to leave these monuments alone, even if they are offensive. Why? Because, for starters, people are more complex than all evil and all good. At least most people. These monuments are a testament to the history of our nation. They remind us of who we…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend