Pro-abortion women who are concerned about the possibility of Roe v. Wade getting overturned now that yet another Supreme Court seat is about to be vacant are desperately attempting to find some way to protect the child murder they wish to engage in, going so far as to actually call for “sex strikes” until they get their way.

Yes, the killing of the unborn, the sacrifice of children on the altar of convenience, is so important to these people they are willing to stop having sex in order to put pressure on men to support abortion, forsaking the sacredness of life for the sake of brief, personal pleasure.

This is truly disgusting, however, coming from the left, it’s to be expected.

Trending: BLM Is Back to Blocking Traffic — Brings Highway to Standstill In Washington (Videos)

Also, how do these folks not see the irony in fighting to save abortion by not having sex? If they aren’t having sex, no one is getting pregnant, which therefore means not going to the abortion mill to murder your kid in the womb. It’s abstinence, which is what a lot of folks advocate to begin with. Again, the irony.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?

• Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

• Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?*
  • Yes
  • No
• Email*
• Comments
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Spooked by the Supreme Court vacancy of Justice Anthony Kennedy, Harper’s Bazaar political editor-at-large Jennifer Wright called for a sex strike from fellow pro-abortion gals to save landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade. Wright instructed her pro-abortion allies to withhold sex and dating “with anyone who doesn’t support a woman’s right to choose.”

The women were told to signal their solidary by posting a female judge emoji in their “dating profiles” and using the hashtag #Lysistrata, in reference to the Greek play wherein women withhold sex in a crusade to end the Peloponnesian War.

Ironically, President Donald Trump is reportedly considering Judge Amy Barrett for the SCOTUS vacancy, a female who called Roe v. Wade an “erroneous decision” in a 2003 scholarly article. Yes, a female judge.

“We’re very likely to lose Roe Vs. Wade. Some men may think that doesn’t concern them. Make it,” posted Wright, adding, “If you’re single and dating, add a [female judge] emoji to your dating profiles to show people you won’t date/sleep with anyone who doesn’t support a woman’s right to choose.”

We're very likely to lose Roe Vs. Wade. Some men may think that doesn't concern them. Make it.

If you're single and dating, add a ????‍⚖️ emoji to your dating profiles to show people you won't date/sleep with anyone who doesn't support a woman's right to choose.#Lysistrata2018

— Jennifer Wright (@JenAshleyWright) July 2, 2018

Sex strikes like these have proven surprisingly effective at creating political change through history: https://t.co/hbTHzY400D

— Jennifer Wright (@JenAshleyWright) July 2, 2018

As you might expect, deplorable women who are enamored with death and bloodshed immediately responded positively to Wright’s call-to-action:

Wow #Lysistrata2018 is an amazing hashtag ????????‍⚖️ I stopped dating non-feminists years ago but why not make it explicit? Pro-Roe or bust, y’all.

— Fiona Erickson (@AllAboutFi) July 2, 2018

#Lysistrata2018 is one of the best hashtags to come out of this decade. ????‍⚖️ https://t.co/WIiacOBubJ

— Tomás Zelmanovitz (@tzelmanovitz15) July 2, 2018

As longtime HD Tweeps know, HD is a Republican-free zone when it comes to dating already. But I am all in for this plan. I am SO tired of men making decisions for women. I am personally tired of people telling me to “calm down” when it comes to Roe v Wade. #Lysistrata2018 https://t.co/TPztzs4zcY

— HawaiiDelilah™ Unredacted Version (@HawaiiDelilah) July 2, 2018

I won't even have a drink with someone who doesn't support women's right to choose. ????‍⚖️ #Lysistrata2018
(Had to copy/paste the emoji, but worth the trouble.)

— (((J M 'Devin Nunes' Cow's IT Guy' Kelly))) (@netsinger) July 2, 2018

These women are truly disgusting in every sense of the word. And no, it’s not the sex strike itself that makes them awful human beings. It’s the fact these monsters actually support the murder of innocent children all so they can avoid the adult responsibilities that come along with sexual activity.

God designed sex to be between one man and one woman who are in a committed marriage relationship exclusively with one another. It is not to be used in any other way and these women who are obviously very active with their sexuality are abusing and misusing a good gift of God.

You can already hear them crying out about being “slut shamed,” a charge that won’t be denied, nor should it be. Yes, if you are promiscuous and as a result of your fornication murder another human being, you absolutely should be ashamed and more so.

Source: Daily Wire