News

Pro-Abortion Feminists Are Employing a New Tactic to Save ‘Roe v. Wade,’ And it Smacks of Desperation

Published

3 years ago

July 4, 2018

Pro-abortion women who are concerned about the possibility of Roe v. Wade getting overturned now that yet another Supreme Court seat is about to be vacant are desperately attempting to find some way to protect the child murder they wish to engage in, going so far as to actually call for “sex strikes” until they get their way.

Yes, the killing of the unborn, the sacrifice of children on the altar of convenience, is so important to these people they are willing to stop having sex in order to put pressure on men to support abortion, forsaking the sacredness of life for the sake of brief, personal pleasure.

This is truly disgusting, however, coming from the left, it’s to be expected.

Also, how do these folks not see the irony in fighting to save abortion by not having sex? If they aren’t having sex, no one is getting pregnant, which therefore means not going to the abortion mill to murder your kid in the womb. It’s abstinence, which is what a lot of folks advocate to begin with. Again, the irony.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism? (1)

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?
Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?*

Healthcare

Communism

Not sure
Email*

Phone
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Spooked by the Supreme Court vacancy of Justice Anthony Kennedy, Harper’s Bazaar political editor-at-large Jennifer Wright called for a sex strike from fellow pro-abortion gals to save landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade. Wright instructed her pro-abortion allies to withhold sex and dating “with anyone who doesn’t support a woman’s right to choose.”

The women were told to signal their solidary by posting a female judge emoji in their “dating profiles” and using the hashtag #Lysistrata, in reference to the Greek play wherein women withhold sex in a crusade to end the Peloponnesian War.

Ironically, President Donald Trump is reportedly considering Judge Amy Barrett for the SCOTUS vacancy, a female who called Roe v. Wade an “erroneous decision” in a 2003 scholarly article. Yes, a female judge.

“We’re very likely to lose Roe Vs. Wade. Some men may think that doesn’t concern them. Make it,” posted Wright, adding, “If you’re single and dating, add a [female judge] emoji to your dating profiles to show people you won’t date/sleep with anyone who doesn’t support a woman’s right to choose.”

We're very likely to lose Roe Vs. Wade. Some men may think that doesn't concern them. Make it.

If you're single and dating, add a ????‍⚖️ emoji to your dating profiles to show people you won't date/sleep with anyone who doesn't support a woman's right to choose.#Lysistrata2018

— Jennifer Wright (@JenAshleyWright) July 2, 2018

Sex strikes like these have proven surprisingly effective at creating political change through history: https://t.co/hbTHzY400D

— Jennifer Wright (@JenAshleyWright) July 2, 2018

As you might expect, deplorable women who are enamored with death and bloodshed immediately responded positively to Wright’s call-to-action:

Wow #Lysistrata2018 is an amazing hashtag ????????‍⚖️ I stopped dating non-feminists years ago but why not make it explicit? Pro-Roe or bust, y’all.

— Fiona Erickson (@AllAboutFi) July 2, 2018

#Lysistrata2018 is one of the best hashtags to come out of this decade. ????‍⚖️ https://t.co/WIiacOBubJ

— Tomás Zelmanovitz (@tzelmanovitz15) July 2, 2018

As longtime HD Tweeps know, HD is a Republican-free zone when it comes to dating already. But I am all in for this plan. I am SO tired of men making decisions for women. I am personally tired of people telling me to “calm down” when it comes to Roe v Wade. #Lysistrata2018 https://t.co/TPztzs4zcY

— HawaiiDelilah™ Unredacted Version (@HawaiiDelilah) July 2, 2018

I won't even have a drink with someone who doesn't support women's right to choose. ????‍⚖️ #Lysistrata2018
(Had to copy/paste the emoji, but worth the trouble.)

— (((J M 'Devin Nunes' Cow's IT Guy' Kelly))) (@netsinger) July 2, 2018

These women are truly disgusting in every sense of the word. And no, it’s not the sex strike itself that makes them awful human beings. It’s the fact these monsters actually support the murder of innocent children all so they can avoid the adult responsibilities that come along with sexual activity.

God designed sex to be between one man and one woman who are in a committed marriage relationship exclusively with one another. It is not to be used in any other way and these women who are obviously very active with their sexuality are abusing and misusing a good gift of God.

You can already hear them crying out about being “slut shamed,” a charge that won’t be denied, nor should it be. Yes, if you are promiscuous and as a result of your fornication murder another human being, you absolutely should be ashamed and more so.

Source: Daily Wire

Facebook Twitter Gab

News

Businesses Should Require Vax Proof from Customers, Says NIH Director

This is simply unconscionable.

Published

11 hours ago

August 1, 2021

Andrew West

Facebook Twitter Gab

There have long been fears that this sort of discrimination was on the horizon, as the willingly unvaccinated become second-class citizens right here in the United States. With only about half of the US population fully vaccinated, (and largely by their own accord), herd immunity looks to be some time away yet. Nearly 20% more of the population will need to wind up with COVID antibodies in order for public health officials to consider the pandemic to be waning, and a maximum pressure campaign is taking shape throughout a number of levels of government. During an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Dr. Frances Collins used his position as the Director of the National Institutes of Health to pressure businesses around the nation to enact strict vaccine-proof restrictions. Anchor Jake Tapper said, “Some businesses are going a step further and requiring proof of vaccinations not just for employees, but even for customers in some cases. Audience members for broadway plays and musicals need to be vaccinated. Some bars in San Francisco and D.C. are requiring proof of vaccinations. Do you think as a public health measure it would be good for more businesses to require vaccine credentials in order to have vaccinated customers?” His answer was astonishing. Collins said, “As a public health person who wants to see this pandemic end, yes. I think anything we can do to encourage reluctant folks to get vaccinated because they’ll want to be part of these public events, that’s a good thing. I’m delighted to see employers like Disney and Walmart coming out and asking their staff to be vaccinated. I’m glad to see the president has said all federal employees. I oversee NIH. With 40,000 people need to get vaccinated or if they’re not to get regular testing which is inconvenient. All of…

Facebook Twitter Gab

Entertainment

Unrepentant YouTube Decides to Suspend Mainstream News Channel Over ‘Misinformation’

The barons of the Information Revolution are no less corrupt than those of the Industrial Revolution before them.

Published

11 hours ago

August 1, 2021

Andrew West

Facebook Twitter Gab

There are concerns that the barons of the Information Revolution, much like the barons of the Industrial Revolution, are exploiting their content producers at an unsustainable clip, and creating a very dangerous bottleneck in the world of free speech. Given just how much of the internet’s traffic flows through just a few sites, it is imperative that we keep a keen eye on what platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are doing. They are the new gatekeepers of nearly the entire breadth of current information, and if they were to choose to keep us in the dark on any particular issue, it would be quite easy for them to do so. That’s why the latest news from YouTube is so terrifying. YouTube said Sunday it had barred Sky News Australia from uploading new content for one week, citing concerns about Covid-19 misinformation. The move comes after a review of posts uploaded by the Rupert Murdoch-owned TV channel, which has a substantial online presence. “We have clear and established Covid-19 medical misinformation policies… to prevent the spread of Covid-19 misinformation that could cause real-world harm,” a YouTube statement said. With 1.86 million YouTube subscribers, the channel — which is owned by a subsidiary of Murdoch’s News Corp — has a conservative following well beyond Australia. The mainstream media and the mainstream social networks haven’t always gotten their COVD info right, either, which makes their declarations regarding “misinformation” all the more laughable. Early on in the pandemic, these platforms pushed back against the possibility that the virus itself may have been a part of some sort of lab leak, even going so far as to censor any such discussion. Over a year later, and as health experts began to suggest this yes, this was truly a possibility, the premature nature of…