Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Pro-Choice Activist Posts Sickening Tweet in Support of Abortion, Gets Obliterated Moments Later

Truly disgusting and disturbing on every level.

Published

on

We’ve all seen sickening and disturbing things being said by those who are full tilt in support of abortion, especially on social media since these platforms have given even the most vile creature among us a voice to spread their wickedness.

However, what one pro-abortion activist said on Twitter is so awful, so horrifying and devoid of any sense of human decency, it almost defies description.

Danielle Campoamor, an editor for Romper and an “abortion AMA columnist,” recently dropped the following gem in a tweet:

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Actor’s Hate Hoax Planned After Previous Propaganda Effort Was Panned

My heartbeat matters more than the heartbeat of a 6-week-old embryo. My heartbeat matters more than the heartbeat of a 6-week-old embryo. My heartbeat matters more than the heartbeat of a 6-week-old embryo. My heartbeat matters more #NoAbortionBan #IAPol

Disgusting, right? Well, she, unfortunately, was not done quite yet:

Still couldn’t quit while she was ahead:

How about that use of the term “anti-choice?” Notice how carefully that word was chosen, as if the real issue is simply a matter of group A wanting to limit the choice, or freedom, of group B.

This isn’t about that at all. It’s about whether or not unborn children have a right to live, or if parents can strip away their freedom and have them murdered in the place where they should be the safest.

After going on her deplorable Twitter rant, the good folks on social media decided that since she was so desperate for attention, they’d give her a little, though after all the replies started rolling in, she probably regretted saying anything to begin with.

https://twitter.com/Sb51Antinomy/status/994603748306685952

One of the many reasons conservatives are pro-life is because it’s ultimately an issue of defining whose rights deserve to be protected. If an unborn baby doesn’t have the right to life, who does? Who gets to decide that and what criteria is being used in creating such a rule?

If human beings have no inherent value and are nothing more than animals that walk upright, then why make murder illegal at all? If humans do have value, why and where does it come from?

These the are the questions the vast majority of pro-abortion folks can’t answer without becoming totally inconsistent in their own worldview.

So instead of answering them, they resort to shock jock statements like this. It’s truly tragic.

Source: Twitchy

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

BOMBSHELL: Hate Crime Hoaxer Smollett Gave ‘False Information’ to Cops In 2007

He has a history of lying…

John Salvatore

Published

on

“Empire” actor Jussie Smollett has a history of lying to law enforcement.

Back in 2007, he “provided false information” after receiving a DUI.

From Daily Wire:

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Jussie Smollett pleaded no contest to DUI, driving without a license, and providing false information to law enforcement officials in 2007, according to new reports released on Tuesday.

“Tuesday the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office confirmed that in August of 2007 Smollett pleaded no contest to DUI, driving without a license and providing false information to law enforcement,” CBS Chicago reported. “He was sentenced to two years probation and a choice of a fine or jail. Officials at the office could not confirm which Smollett chose. A spokesman for the Chicago Police Department said the department was already aware of the plea.”

This latest revelation follows several significant developments over the last few days, and could end up impacting how prosecutors handle potential false report charges.

Senators Kamala Harris (CA) and Cory Booker (NJ) are both running for president.

The chances that either person secures the Democrat nomination are slim, at best.

After hearing that Empire actor Jussie Smollett was the “victim” of a “hate crime,” both Booker and Harris rushed to slam the “attack” as a “modern day lynching.”

Of course, the country now knows that Smollett faked the attack and paid two brothers to orchestrate the whole thing.

Now, Harris is at a loss for words when confronted by a reporter asking about Smollett…

From Free Beacon:

Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) froze and awkwardly looked around when pressed Monday on her tweet that the alleged attack on Jussie Smollett was a “modern-day lynching,” before saying she needed to see all the facts.

Smollet, a gay, black actor, claimed he was the victim of a hate crime in January, saying two men beat him up in a Chicago street, poured bleach on him and placed a rope around his neck. He also said they yelled, “This is MAGA country,” a reference to President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” campaign slogan. The story has taken a turn, with police now reportedly investigating whether Smollett orchestrated the attack himself by paying two Nigerian brothers to do it.

Democratic politicians were quick to believe Smollett’s account at the time and tweet out their condemnations, including Harris and other 2020 presidential candidates. She praised the actor as “one of the kindest, most gentle human beings I know” and said “this was an attempted modern day lynching.”

WATCH:

Check out Booker:

Continue Reading

News

NEVER FORGET: Bernie Was Asked to Leave Hippie Commune for Refusing to Work

Telling.

John Salvatore

Published

on

2020 presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has a wild past.

Part of it involves being kicked off of a hippie commune for refusing to work.

So, there’s something for Democrats to consider.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

From Free Beacon:

Bernie Sanders was asked to leave a hippie commune in 1971 for “sitting around and talking” about politics instead of working, according to a forthcoming book.

We Are As Gods by Kate Daloz, scheduled for release April 26, chronicles the rise and fall of the Myrtle Hill Farm in northeast Vermont. Daloz, a Brooklyn writer, was in a special position to write a history of Myrtle Hill: she was raised near the commune in a geodesic dome residence with an outhouse called the Richard M. Nixon Memorial Hall. Her parents were close acquaintances of the commune residents, who offered them tips about wilderness living.

In the summer of 1971, Myrtle Hill received a visitor: Bernie Sanders, age 30, at the cusp of his political career with the socialist Liberty Union Party.

Democrats can’t be too happy to learn that Trump is polling well against their nominees for 2020.

In fact, it would appear Trump’s only true challenger might be former Vice President Joe Biden.

And Joe hasn’t even said if he’s going to run or not.

Here are the results:

More from 0ptimus:

Based on these results, Biden begins as the strongest Democratic challenger tested. His high exposure and favorability push him to a 7-point edge in a head to head match-up, and 4-point edge with Schultz in the race. Other Democrats are slightly behind Trump, though Trump remains between 41-44% in each match-up and the number of undecideds is in double-digits due to a relative lack of exposure.

In a head-to-head result:

-Joe Biden 50%, Donald Trump 43%, undecided 7%

-Donald Trump 45%, Kamala Harris 44%, undecided 12%

Three-way results:

-Joe Biden 45%, Donald Trump 41%, Howard Schultz 6%, undecided 8%

-Donald Trump 42%, Kamala Harris 38%, Howard Schultz 7%, undecided 13%

-Donald Trump 42%, Elizabeth Warren 39%, Howard Schultz 8%, undecided 11%

-Donald Trump 42%, Beto O’Rourke 33%, Howard Schultz 9%, undecided 16%

Sanders is a good Democrat.

He says everything necessary to get the uninformed riled up.

He doesn’t need facts. Facts are irrelevant to the left.

For example, speaking from a stage in South Carolina on MLK Day, Sanders said the unthinkable about President Trump.

WATCH:

Sanders: “It gives me no pleasure to tell you that we now have a President of the United States who is a racist.

Based on what, exactly?

Facepalm.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend