Connect with us

News

Prosecutor Who Questioned Ford in Hearings Dismantles Her Testimony in 5-Page Memo

She approached the case in a legal, not political context, and it was in this context that she made her determination of Ford’s claims.

Published

on

Although many people could tell based on the plain facts we’ve been given about the accusations Dr. Christine Ford has made against Brett Kavanaugh that there was nothing in her claims that would hold up in a court of law, the prosecutor who questioned Ford in Thursday’s closely-watched hearings has outlined exactly why she would  not bring charges against Kavanaugh.

While the new #MeToo is “I believe Christine Blasey Ford”, those who proudly proclaim this have nothing more to go on than their own personal biases, because her accusations hold no water legally.

Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell outlined Ford’s case against Kavanaugh in a 5-page memo released Sunday, which she called “even weaker” than a “he said, she said” scenario.

Trending: Trump to ‘Lightweight’ Reporter: ‘Don’t Ever Talk to the President That Way!’ — VIDEO

In her memo, she explained:

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This memorandum contains my own independent assessment of Dr. Ford’s allegations,
based upon my independent review of the evidence and my nearly 25 years of experience
as a career prosecutor of sex-related and other crimes in Arizona. This memorandum does
not necessarily reflect the views of the Chairman, any committee member, or any other
senator. No senator reviewed or approved this memorandum before its release, and I was
not pressured in any way to write this memorandum or to write any words in this
memorandum with which I do not fully agree. The words written in this memorandum are
mine, and I fully stand by all of them. While I am a registered Republican, I am not a
political or partisan person

She explained that, while the confirmation hearings were not a court of law, she is a prosecutor, so she approached the case in a legal, not political context, and it was in this context that she made her determination of Ford’s claims:

In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A “he said, she said” case is incredibly difficult
to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the
event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For
the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this
case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is
sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard

Her memo goes on to break down the numerous points that weaken Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh, such as:

  • The numerous accounts Ford gave to others of the alleged assault in which she did not name Kavanaugh
  • The many inconsistencies in Ford’s account of the alleged assault
  • Ford’s lack of memory of key details of her account of the alleged assault
  • The conspicuous lack of any additional witnesses that can corroborate Ford’s testimony
  • Ford’s failure to remember not only key details about the assault but details about who she told and when, casting more doubt on her memory
  • The influence of congressional Democrats and Ford’s attorneys on Ford’s account (see timeline below)

 

 

Save conservative media!

News

Obama In 2008: We Can Only Trust Mail-In Ballots If Signatures Are Verified (Watch)

Ain’t that something!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

It’s pretty amazing how Democrats can flip the switch. They hated the Electoral College for a long time…until their guy “won.” Many of them, like Barack Obama and Rep. Jerry Nadler (NY), once said mail-in voting is rife with fraud. But again, because their guy “won,” they refuse to speak the truth. Cowards. Here’s what the worst president in American history said in 2008 on MSNBC, “Well, I think we have to figure out whether this is fraud proof. I mean, Oregon has a terrific mail-in system but they’ve already scanned everyone’ signature whose registered to vote so that they can check to make sure that in fact the right people are voting.” WATCH: https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1331942266018082819 LOOK: https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1332354346307108869?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1332354346307108869%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F11%2Fflashback-obama-says-mail-ballots-can-trusted-signatures-verified-video%2F Even though Dems claim voter fraud isn’t real, Nadler said in 2004 that it was very real. WATCH: View this post on Instagram After admitting this, Jerry Nadler and Democrats have so little shame that they are advocating for mail-in voting?! A post shared by Dinesh D'Souza (@dineshjdsouza) on Aug 4, 2020 at 7:40am PDT WATCH: https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1276216650442964994?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1276216650442964994&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fdem-rep-jerry-nadler-calls-antifa-imaginary-and-gets-dragged-by-twitter-and-destroyed-by-jim-jordan%2F

Continue Reading

News

Olbermann: You’re Absolutely ‘Right’ We Want to Criminalize Policy Differences (Watch)

The TDS may never disappear!

John Salvatore

Published

on

If you don’t agree with us, you should be ostracized or even imprisoned. That’s how the left thinks. That’s how crazy they have become. The left is clearly comprised of communists and socialists and they’re not even afraid to hide it anymore. Keith Olbermann is one of the worst they have to offer. The former ESPN host blabbered, “G– d**n it! When the policy differences are between maintaining American democracy and substituting racist, one party rule. You’re G– d**n right, we want to criminalize policy differences that might exist between the outgoing administration and the administration that is about to take over.” WATCH: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1331426604724043777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1331426604724043777%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fyoure-g-dn-right-we-want-to-criminalize-policy-differences-olbermann-says-out-loud-what-cnn-merely-implies%2F In short, Olbermann is a goon. To him, the only opinion that matters is the left’s. Who employs this guy, these days? WATCH: https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1314718453295702016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1314718453295702016%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fprominent-left-winger-rants-that-amy-coney-barrett-should-be-forcibly-removed-from-our-society-will-cnns-fdabg-care%2F From New York Post: Keith Olbermann is leaving ESPN again. This time, he insisted it’s on good terms. Olbermann announced on Twitter that he will be offering political commentary on a new YouTube show, “The Worst Person in the World,” that begins on Wednesday. WATCH: https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1313602428340764672 Well, he got the title of his show correct.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week