Connect with us

News

Report: Good Guy With A Gun Stopped Oklahoma Walmart Shooter [Details]

Go figure!

John Salvatore

Published

on

How will Congressional Democrats, the uninformed, and the mainstream media spin this one? Should the good guy with a gun who stopped a mass shooting not have had his gun in the first place, therefore potentially putting more lives at risk? Would that help some people sleep at night or something?

See how easy it is to defeat a liberal argument? It doesn’t require much thought. And this is why most Dems aren’t smarter than your average fifth grader. Check this out, via Daily Mail:

A man shot and killed his estranged wife and her new boyfriend in a Walmart parking lot in Oklahoma before turning the gun on himself when an armed citizen intervened.

Trending: Biden Refuses to Answer Debate Question, Tells President Trump: ‘Will You Shut Up, Man?’

According to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol, a man wearing all black opened fire outside the supercenter in Duncan, which is located at 3393 North 81 Highway. Duncan is about 80 miles south of Oklahoma City.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Continued:

Officers from the Duncan Police Department said the wife and her boyfriend were found dead inside their car.

Family members at the scene say the shooting was sparked by a domestic dispute between the woman and her husband, but didn’t go into further details.

The Gun-Free Zone is a microcosm of the “Socialist-Utopia,” Democrats dream of.

A recent Crime Research Prevention Center study showed, violent killers seek out Gun-Free Zones 94% of the time. So, why would Politicians refuse to re-evaluate their support of these deadly areas, even after seeing the massacres that they cause? First, we need to look at their decades-long commitment to gun-control. From the lowest ranks of the Beto O’Rourkes, all the way up to Presidents, we have seen a relentless push for gun control, regardless of the deadly effects gun-restrictions show us time and time again.

Two common elements that fuel the ignorant push for Gun-Free Zones are the perceived intellectual superiority of the Gun-Grabbers and a denial or ignorance of the American spirit. The intellectuals who continue to believe that a government-controlled Utopia can be created in America could never admit that their ideas are flawed. They truly believe that in the end they will create the government controlled Socialist-Utopia they’ve always dreamed of. Many of these people have been taught from birth that they are intellectually superior; so how could they ever admit that their ideas are dangerous and delusional, and if they did, what would that say about them?

The Anti-2nd Amendment Radicals in Congress, left-wing media and anti-gun lobbying groups like Moms Demand Action and Everytown for Gun Safety, watch people die in these deadly zones while ignoring their own culpability. They stand on graves while pushing their agenda and use the death-toll numbers to gain more support for gun-control. Their belief that they know what is best, gives them false-license to ignore reality and continue to put people in danger by making them unarmed and helpless. They have studied the strategies and tactics other Governments have used on people to enforce compliance and they believe they will be able to do the same. But they fail to see one very important element, that if not unique to America, extremely strong in the hearts of most Americans due to the nature of our founding.

The Gun-Grabbers don’t understand the strength of the American spirit because it is something that they have lost (or never had to begin with.) The passion for freedom, liberty and individualism, runs through the veins of the majority of Americans, but it is completely lost on some. Patriotism and the willingness of real Americans to fight against tyranny (again, if we must) is the biggest roadblock faced by the Socialists living among us. Our founding fathers wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights with their own blood, but some of the people we put in charge to defend those documents, have been taught to believe they are irrelevant.

If those who support the Utopian experimental laboratories known as Gun-Free Zones, were to admit that they are a dreadful failure, they would also have to admit that their idea of a government-controlled Utopian America is a fantasy. So, rather than acknowledge the blood on their hands, they push for more Gun-Free Zones and watch people get slaughtered while continuing to tell themselves that they are much smarter than everyone else.

Why do we expect people, who can’t conceptualize freedom, to defend freedom?

Save conservative media!

News

Joe Biden’s Deputy Campaign Manager Squashes Possibility Of Bailing Out On Debates: ‘We Are Going To Do The Debates’

Published

on

It didn’t take long after the bloodbath that was the first presidential debate Tuesday evening for the mainstream media and many liberals across the country to start panicking and calling for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden to decline to do any further debates with President Trump. The man was pummeled constantly for an hour and a half, meanwhile the president also had to debate moderator Chris Wallace, which just goes to show you what a back alley brawler Trump really is to hold his ground against two enemies coming at him at once. However, Biden’s deputy campaign manager has squashed the idea of avoiding future debates, stating the former vice president would be participating in the events. via Daily Wire: Biden’s deputy campaign manager avowed that Biden would commit to the two next presidential debates, scheduled for October 15 and October 22. According to The Hill, Kate Bedingfield quashed any ideas that Biden would skip the next two debates, saying, “I don’t know how many different ways we can say it. Yes, we are going to do the debates. I would imagine there will be some additional conversations [with the Commission on Presidential Debates]. But yeah, we are committing to attending the debates.” Senator Chris Coons (D-DL), who serves as a Biden surrogate, had informed Politico that he was unsure whether further debates should be held, iterating: It was very hard to follow what was being said, and President Trump showed not just disrespect to the moderator, but to the American people who tuned in trying to figure out what his plans are. The point of the debate is for the American people to make a decision, informed by hearing from the two candidates on what’s your record, what are your values? Joe Biden came prepared to respect the American…

Continue Reading

News

Lindsey Graham Unveils Letter From DOJ Attorney Who Responded To Issues Concerning Carter Page FISA Applications

Published

on

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham revealed a letter he received from a Justice Department attorney who signed off on the surveillance warrant applications that sought out court authority to provide a wiretap on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. In this particular letter, which Graham read out loud and officially entered into the record at a hearing held Wednesday morning with former FBI Director James Comey, the Office of Intelligence attorney stated that he or she wouldn’t have signed off on these warrant applications had they known about the issues that have now been uncovered by the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Here’s more on this developing story via Washington Examiner: “The OI attorney advises that had he/she been aware of the significant errors and omissions identified by the OIG and the errors in the Woods process, he/she would not have signed the filed Page FISA applications,” the letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd to Graham obtained by the Washington Examiner states. “The OI attorney further advises that he/she is not aware of any additional errors or omissions in the Page FISA applications or in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation more generally that were not identified in the OIG Report.” Graham then noted that two ex-DOJ officials who had also signed off on the Page surveillance, former Deputy Attorneys General Rod Rosenstein and Sally Yates, both testified to the panel that they would not have signed off on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants if they knew then what they know now. Four FISA applications and renewals against Page were approved by FBI and DOJ leadership and by the FISA court, including three approvals by Comey. Page has denied any wrongdoing and was never charged with a crime. The hearing Wednesday is the latest in the judiciary panel’s…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend