Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

REVEALED: New Emails Show Obama White House ‘Cover Up’ of Hillary’s Deleted Emails

If only the media peeled off the blinders…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton.

Arguably the two most corrupt, conniving politicians in the history of the United States?

There’s a decent chance, that’s for sure.

Trending: WATCH: Omar Openly Mocks Conservative Christians From Floor of House of Representatives

New emails have now revealed that the extremely un-transparent Obama White House was complicit in a cover-up of Hillary’ 30,000-plus deleted emails.

take our poll - story continues below

Who is most likely to win the Democrat nomination?

  • Who is most likely to win the Democrat nomination?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

From Daily Caller:

The Obama White House kept tabs on a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email accounts that the State Department improperly denied, according to newly released emails.

The emails, which were provided to Judicial Watch, show for the first time that the Obama White House was aware of the Clinton-related FOIA request, which the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) submitted to the State Department in December 2012.

Continued:

The State Department denied the request in May 2013, claiming that no responsive records existed. That despite officials at the State Department, the White House and even President Obama himself knowing that Clinton used a personal email account for government business.

The State Department’s inspector general determined in a report released on Jan. 7, 2016 that the State Department’s denial of the CREW request was “inaccurate and incomplete.”

Whoever tweets for Barack isn’t doing him any favors.

Coming in at around 280 characters, it would seem as though Obama is confirming that his time as president was completely bogus.

Young people all over the world are leading the way in the fight to protect our planet because they know their future depends on it. This Earth Day, I want to celebrate the courageous, committed young leaders who are stepping up to save the one planet we’ve got.

This generation of climate activists is tired of inaction, and they’ve caught the attention of leaders all over the world. So while this challenge is only getting more urgent, they show us the kind of action it’ll take to meet this moment.

What’s the probelm with Obama’s words, exactly?

Allow conservatives on Twitter to point it out…

I’m old enough to remember when we had a President who cared about the Earth we live on.

Here’s a video flashback of Barack talking about receding oceans and healing the planet:

More reactions:

Sounds like @BarackObama forgot who was leader of the Free World for 8 years.

This guy should run for President. He can give speeches about the moment the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal. It’ll be awesome.

Captain Platitude strikes again.

If you like your planet, you can keep your planet

He will bring change, I just know it.

Obama was a close friend of Preacher Jeremiah “God D*** America” Wright for numerous years.

Wright is well-known for being racist and hating the United States.

Conservative outlets warned the nation about the connection Obama had to Wright before the 2008 election, but it didn’t make a difference to the left.

“The National Enquirer” admitted to colluding with the 2016 Trump campaign in order to allegedly take attention away from Donald’s extramarital affairs.

The left had a field day.

Though, how come the MSM didn’t make a peep when team Obama offered Wright $150,000 for his silence?

H/T: Twitchy

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Pentagon Makes Scary Suggestion About Possible Troop Buildup

President Trump isn’t going to like it.

Published

on

military

The Pentagon today seemed to contradict President Trump regarding US military presence abroad with a worrisome statement. Over the course of the last few weeks, tensions in the Middle East have been rising steadily.  Much of this turmoil has come from an ongoing series of attacks on the Saudi Arabians’ oil infrastructure which are believed to have been committed by either the Iranian Revolutionary Guard or their proxies. In the aftermath of the first two attacks, one that targeted four oil tankers and another that detonated an explosive at a Saudi Pipeline location, there was confusion in Washington DC.  President Trump was adamant that he wanted to avoid a war with Iran – despite the Persian nation’s incessant threats against the US. On the other side of the coin, however, was national security adviser John Bolton, whose hawkish lust for war is fairly well document from his previous stints in and around the White House. Now the Pentagon in weighing in, and Donald Trump won’t like it. The Pentagon on Thursday will present plans to the White House to send up to 10,000 more troops to the Middle East, in a move to beef up defenses against potential Iranian threats , U.S. officials said. The officials said no final decision has been made yet, and it’s not clear if the White House would approve sending all or just some of the requested forces. Officials said the move is not in response to any new threat from Iran but is aimed at reinforcing security in the region. They said the troops would be defensive forces, and the discussions include additional Patriot missile batteries, more ships and increased efforts to monitor Iran. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has indicated that he sides with the President on the matter, hoping to deter Iran from…

Continue Reading

News

Not Just a Trade War Anymore: Senate Ponders New China Sanctions Over Concentration Camps

There are some evils in the world that must not go unpunished.

Published

on

China

Much of the talk on the world’s economic stage of late has been in regard to the showdown between Washington and Beijing. Of course, the magnitude of this conflict warrants the concern.  We are talking about two of the world most powerful economic forces squaring off in a fight that could bring much the world into the ring with it. Both sides, at least of this writing, seem hellbent on coming out victorious – leading to inordinate weaving and bobbing by the stock markets and righteous anger in America’s agricultural heartland. Today, the US is considering imposing new sanctions on China…but not over this trade dispute.  These sanctions are in retaliation for something far more sinister. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed a bill Tuesday that, if enacted, would call for sanctions on the Chinese government and select individuals over the mass imprisonment of potentially millions of Muslims in concentration camps in eastern Xinjiang province. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), under Xi Jinping, has building hundreds of “re-eduation centers” that it claims are “vocational training” facilities for Uighurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other minorities. Those who have survived them call them “concentration camps” – locations where they are taken by force to learn Mandarin, renouncing their Muslim faith, memorize communist propaganda songs, and engage in slave labor. The gruesome tales from inside these camps are enough to boil any Americans’ blood; sleep deprivation, electroshock torture, and even death. As if that weren’t enough… The camps are so agonizing, a Kazakh survivor told Radio Free Asia (RFA) on Monday, that officials have established specific “crying time” to give those imprisoned a chance to release their frustrations. “They say, ‘Now you can cry,’ but if we cry at other times when we feel the need, they criticize and threaten us, saying they will…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend