Connect with us

News

Rhode Island Professor Says Portland Activist Who Killed Trump Supporter Was Justified From A ‘Moral’ Perspective

Published

on

A professor from Rhode Island is finding himself in the spotlight after making a sickening statement about the Portland protester who killed a Trump supporter wearing a Patriot Prayer hat, stating the killing was justified because the man he killed was a “fascist.”

The comment was made by Erik Loomis. Loomis teaches history at the University of Rhode Island. His statement was made in response to a comment on his blog post entitled, “Why Was Michael Reinoehl Killed?”

This just proves these people have no idea what that word even means. If they understood its definition, they’d clearly see they are the fascists one.

Trending: Former CNN Host: If GOP Attempts ‘to Replace RBG We Burn the Entire F— Thing Down’

via Fox News:

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The post questioned whether police deliberately “murdered” 48-year-old Michael Reinoehl, the man who fatally shot Aaron “Jay” Danielson on Aug. 29, the night Trump supporters clashed with backers of Black Lives Matter in Portland.

“I am extremely anti-conspiracy theory. But it’s not a conspiracy theory at this point in time to wonder if the cops simply murdered him,” Loomis wrote. “The police is shot through with fascists from stem to stern. They were openly working with the fascists in Portland, as they were in Kenosha which led to dead protestors.”

By “fascists,” Loomis is ostensibly referring to Trump supporters and members of Patriot Prayer, a group founded by conservative activist and former Washington Senate candidate Joey Gibson. The group has been portrayed by the mainstream media and the Southern Poverty Law Center as a far-right hate group, though Gibson has denied this characterization.

Last week, law enforcement officers investigating Danielson’s death fatally shot Reinoehl after locating him in Lacey, Wash. Earlier that day, Portland police had obtained a second-degree murder warrant for Reinoehl in connection with Daniel’s death.

“Michael Reinoehl is the guy who killed the fascist in Portland last week,” Loomis wrote in the piece published on September 4. “He admitted it and said he was scared the cops would kill him. Well, now the cops have killed him.”

A comment responded to the piece saying, “Erik, he shot a guy.”

“[Reinoehl] killed a fascist. I see nothing wrong with it, at least from a moral perspective,” Loomis replied.

Loomis then went on to compare Reinoehl to John Brown, a radical abolitionist who during the mid-19 century was an advocate for using violence to help bring slavery to an end in the United States.

Instead of being a decent human being and retracting his statement, Loomis penned a new piece saying he wouldn’t be intimidated by “fascists” trying to “cancel him.”

Is 2020 over yet?

Save conservative media!

News

Biden Said He Received Full Scholarship, Graduated Top of His Law School Class — He Lied

And he plagiarized, too…

John Salvatore

Published

on

As a career politician, Joe Biden knows a thing or two about lying. Even though he has been caught telling falsehoods many, many times over, the mainstream media and his supporters still decide to look the other way. For example, here’s a quote from Joe, speaking to a reporter, while running for president in 1988: “I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect. I went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my — in my class to have a full academic scholarship. In the first year in law school I decided didn’t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds of my class, and then decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school, and in fact ended up in the top half of my class. I won the international moot-court competition. I was the outstanding student in the political science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits — I only needed 123 credits. And I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like Frank.” The problem is that literally nothing in that statement is true. None of it. From The Daily Wire: It turned out that Biden did not receive a full academic scholarship, but a half scholarship based on financial need. He did not end up in the top half of his class, but near the very bottom. There is no record of him winning the moot court competition. He did not receive the outstanding student award at the University of Delaware. And he graduated with only one degree. For the record, this is Biden’s third run for POTUS (1988, 2008, 2020). After…

Continue Reading

News

I Will Nominate A Woman for Supreme Court Next Week, Trump Says At North Carolina Rally

This third pick needs to be a person that will have conservatives cheering.

John Salvatore

Published

on

Donald Trump’s presidency has already been historic for a number of reasons. He will add to his legacy in the coming days, when he nominates a third person to the Supreme Court in just his first term. Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have sided with the liberal wing of SCOTUS from time to time, so those two choices weren’t exactly home runs. Still, they definitely lean right. This third pick needs to be a person that will have conservatives cheering. LOOK: https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork/status/1307458271377227776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307458271377227776%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F09%2Fcrowd-begins-chanting-fill-seat-trump-rally-north-carolina-president-trump-announces-will-name-nominee-week-woman%2F WATCH: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307486709521809419?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307486709521809419%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-says-scotus-pick-will-be-a-woman-here-are-12-possibilities https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307486631373438976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307486631373438976%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-says-scotus-pick-will-be-a-woman-here-are-12-possibilities From The Daily Wire: ABC News, citing “multiple sources familiar with the thinking of the president and his advisers,” reports that Judge Amy Coney Barrett, 48, of Indiana, is considered a front-runner for the vacant seat. Notably, Barrett was one of the finalists when Trump was considering a replacement for Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose seat was later filled by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. According to USA Today, Judge Barbara Lagoa, 52, a recent addition to the list of potential Supreme Court nominees, is considered a “little-known” front-runner. The news agency reports that Trump briefly mentioned her during remarks to reporters on Saturday, saying that he has “heard at length” about her, and that she is “highly respected.” Let’s hear your thoughts in the comment section…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend