Connect with us

News

Rush Limbaugh Delivers Epic Response to Trump’s Crack Down on CNN’s Jim Acosta

Nicely spoken, Rush.

Published

on

CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta is not having a very good week. Early on Wednesday he had a confrontation with President Trump that ended with the Commander-in-Chief taking him to the woodshed over his rude and inexcusable behavior, an embarrassing display to say the least.

However, his bad day didn’t end there. In fact, it got even worse. The president revoked his hard pass for being combative, not allowing an aide to take his microphone, and refusing to allow other reporters to ask questions.

The incident actually unfolded during conservative powerhouse Rush Limbaugh’s radio program, which enabled him to give some play-by-play commentary. As you might expect, it’s pretty awesome.

Trending: Civilian Alerts Airmen After Noticing Something Odd Coming from Back of F-15 Jet, Now They're Thanking Him

In response, Limbaugh said what was there for “everybody to see” was exactly what’s been happening all along with the media’s treatment of Trump.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?

  • Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“And this is there for everybody to see,” said Limbaugh. “It’s nothing new. It’s the way the press has been dealing with Trump.”

Limbaugh went on to play another clip from yet another combative reporter, American Urban Radio Networks’ April Ryan.

“There was another set of fireworks after Jim Acosta behaved as the childish, rude person he is,” said Rush. “April Ryan of something called the American Urban Radio Networks decided to start asking questions when she had not been given the microphone, when she had not been called on. This is another radical leftist political hack that’s working as a journalist.”

“I’ll give you voter suppression. Take a look at the CNN polls, how inaccurate they were. That’s called voter suppression,” said Trump. But when he gave a reporter a chance to ask a question, Ryan attempted to interrupt repeatedly.

“The point is, that’s April Ryan, and she doesn’t have the microphone,” said Limbaugh. “When it’s a journalist’s turn, they have an aide in there passing a microphone around so everybody can hear the question. She was not given the microphone. She just started shouting questions out, ‘What do you mean voter suppression?’ And Trump’s point about voter suppression is that negative polls — for example, was it a Reuters poll? There was a Reuters poll yesterday that had both Gillum and Bill Nelson up by seven! On Election Day! Well, they end up both losing! But a poll has ’em up plus seven. That’s what Trump is calling voter suppression. When CNN runs all of these crazy polls showing the Democrats running away with everything, that’s voter suppression because it tends to make Republicans think there’s no reason to vote! It’s over, it’s hopeless! ‘Cause people believe this garbage!”

Here’s the full video of the encounter Trump had with Acosta. It’s quite entertaining.

While President Trump doesn’t always deliver the most articulate, clear answers to a lot of important questions, the one thing he does well is put an out of control left-wing media back in its place.

For far too long, liberal mainstream media has been allowed to push conservatives around. With Trump, they know they can’t get away with that, and it’s eating them up.

Perhaps what they ought to do is examine how they approach issues to see if, perhaps, the criticisms against them by Republicans has any real merit. If it does, they should make changes in order to preserve journalistic ethics and integrity.

It’s really that simple.

Source: Daily Wire

News

US Pop Star Offers to Pay Fines For Olympic Team Protesting Skimpy Outfits

The IOC wants the women to remain scantily clad, and this is undoubtedly on account of their incessant greed.

Published

on

The Olympics may have built themselves as some sort of prestigious and untouchable global event in years past, but the last few decades have revealed just what a shady cash-grab the games have become. It all began in the 90’s when the financially-struggling Winter Olympics added snowboarding to the games, in a move that was blatantly meant to generate ad revenue from the emerging sport and its fans.  In this quest to cash in, the International Olympic Committee refused to allow any actual snowboarding organizations participate in the operations, which drove several of the world’s best to boycott.  This, in turn, completely ruined the concept that the gold medalists were truly the best in the world, and exposed the IOC as nothing more than a marketing firm. Now, in 2021, a number of female athletes are complaining that they are being forced to wear skimpier clothes than their male counterparts, (often in the same discipline), to which the IOC responded with a “be quiet and play” sort of attitude. Again, the skimpier outfits equate to more ratings, so Olympic organizers are refusing to make accommodations. This has led US pop star Pink to step up.  US pop star Pink has offered to pay the fines handed out to the Norwegian women’s beach handball team, after they wore shorts like their male counterparts instead of bikini bottoms. The team was fined 1,500 euros (£1,295) for “improper clothing” at the European Beach Handball Championships last week. “I’m very proud of the Norwegian female beach handball team for protesting sexist rules about their uniform,” tweeted the singer on Sunday. “Good on ya, ladies,” she added. “I’ll be happy to pay your fines for you. Keep it up.” In doing so, the Olympics will get their coveted cash and these female athletes will be able to perform…

Continue Reading

News

GOP Rep. Says There’s ‘Credible’ Evidence of Wuhan Lab-Leak Theory

China has been avoiding any such investigation for months now.

Published

on

From the very moment that the COVID-19 pandemic began, there were concerns that China wasn’t telling us the truth. This was primarily based on Beijing’s horrendous record of dishonesty when it comes to the international community, which has been ever-so frequent in cases in which the Chinese government could be made to appear cruel or uncaring. To be fair, it doesn’t take long for most to realize that this is, in fact, reality, especially as we continue to receive credible reports of the nation’s use of concentration camps and ethnic cleansing. In the case of the coronavirus, not only did the world discover that the data coming out of Beijing was wholly incorrect, but that a laboratory specializing in the exact type of coronaviruses that caused COVID-19 happened to be just a few miles away from the epicenter of the pandemic. Now, despite numerous attempts to stall or stymy efforts to investigate the theory that pandemic began as a lab-leak, one US lawmaker is claiming that there is credible evidence of just such a possibility.  Sunday, on FNC’s “The Next Revolution,” Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) stressed the importance of investigating the origins of COVID-19, and in particular, China’s role. His statement was stern. “As you know, we still have yet to have any notice that there will be an investigation. And so I think, rightfully, we used the powers of oversight that we have in Congress and we convened a hearing. Unfortunately, none of the Democrats attended that hearing. But the expert testimony from the witnesses was quite profound and quite significant. “And I think as they said, and I would tend to agree that this virus came from the laboratory, whether it was a leak, whether it was accidental, whether it was intentional, whether it was manmade or whether it…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week