Connect with us

News

SAY WHAT!? Neil Gorsuch Sides With Liberal Justices On ‘Gun Violence’ Law (Details)

DUUUUDEE!! What’s the deal!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, and Chief Justice John Roberts all dissented.

Notice a name missing from that list? It’s Neil Gorsuch.

President Trump’s first Supreme Court nomination, the entire reason many people voted for Trump in 2016, just sided with the liberal minority on the bench.

Trending: Nearly $17 Million Given to Hunter Biden Was ‘Stolen From Ukrainian Citizens,’ Report Says

Check this out…

take our poll - story continues below

Will Democrats win the house and senate in 2020?

  • Will Democrats win the house and senate in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

From The Hill:

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 that a federal law allowing for gun convictions relating to “a crime of violence” was too vague.

The case involved a pair of men who were convicted on several felony robbery charges, but were also convicted under another federal statute that required significant mandatory minimum sentences for a “crime of violence.”

The men in question — Maurice Davis and Andre Glover — argued that the federal law was too vague. The justices on Monday were split in their decision, but ultimately sided with the men.

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, and was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Students at a Georgia college want Justice Thomas’ name removed from a building.

But there’s a problem.

They have no flippin’ clue why!

WATCH:

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was asked what he’d do if a Supreme Court seat was up for grabs in 2020, a presidential election year.

Of course, he was asked this question because the GOP-controlled Senate refused in 2016 to confirm Obama’s pick, Merrick Garland, saying the new president should get to pick.

It was a tactic that worked.

Check out Cocaine Mitch answer the reporter, as he keeps a big smirk on his face the entire time…

WATCH:

More context:

It’s so sloppy that this is being reported as a reversal. It really isn’t. It’s exactly what McConnell said all along.

In 2016, Sen. McConnell argued that with a divided government (Dem White House, GOP Senate), the voters should decide who gets to appoint J. Scalia’s replacement.

That first condition does not apply. We don’t have a divide WH/Senate anymore.

As most conservatives are well aware, Obamacare was unconstitutional from the start considering it originated in the Senate.

Now, an appeals court has ruled in the Trump administration’s favor on a major issue.

What this means is the Supreme Court may wind up ruling on the Redistribution of Wealth Act’s Affordable Care Act’s legality before the 2020 presidential election.

In other words, it’s kind of a big deal.

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

FBI Official Under Investigation for Altering Doc Allowing Agency to Spy On Trump Campaign

Don’t kid yourself. This is a big deal…

John Salvatore

Published

on

This is a big deal if there ever was a big deal. And in case you weren’t clear, yes, it is a big deal. Here’s the deal, via “fake news” CNN: An FBI official is under criminal investigation for allegedly altering a document that was central to the FBI’s surveillance of a Trump campaign official in 2016, according to a new report from CNN. “The finding is expected to be part of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s review of the FBI’s effort to obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aide,” CNN reported. “Horowitz turned over evidence on the allegedly altered document to John Durham, the federal prosecutor appointed early this year by Attorney General William Barr to conduct a broad investigation of intelligence gathered for the Russia probe by the CIA and other agencies, including the FBI. The altered document is also at least one focus of Durham’s criminal probe.” WATCH: THE FIX WAS IN… FBI official allegedly altered document that was basis for FISA warrant on surveillance of the 2016 Trump campaign. https://twitter.com/CaliforniaPanda/status/1197665317675294722?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197665317675294722&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fbreaking-fbi-official-under-criminal-investigation-for-altering-document-used-to-start-probe-into-trump-campaign Reactions: And CNN puts it in paragraph 2 – bc this is the most important thing – that Trump will accuse the FBI of wrongdoing in this investigation. Well, yeah! https://twitter.com/AshleeLee4848/status/1197665554955419650?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197665554955419650&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F Well would you look at that. Suddenly people in our MSM want to do their jobs before that report comes out Dec 9th… https://twitter.com/guntotingteabag/status/1197667744344399873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197667744344399873&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F The Republicans have been talking about this for 3 years. #JusticeIsComing https://twitter.com/JIMBAUR/status/1197665823562719232?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197665823562719232&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F The FBI also altered Flynn’s 302. William Barr is going to drop the hammer and nobody will be left to cover for each other 🇺🇸 https://twitter.com/shelby60235316/status/1197666898005020672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197666898005020672&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2019%2F11%2F21%2Freport-fbi-official-who-allegedly-altered-document-related-to-2016-russia-probe-under-investigation%2F If the Democrats and a handful of intelligence community personnel escape accountability for this, it’s over for the country. The deep state can…

Continue Reading

News

Adam Schiff Says President Trump’s Actions Are Worse Than ‘Anything Nixon Did’ (Details)

Based on……what??

John Salvatore

Published

on

Democrat California Congresslady Adam Schiff doesn’t know much about history. Schiff, a beta male, might actually be completely ignorant. His statement on Nixon vs. Trump pretty much makes it clear. From The Hill: House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) used his closing remarks in Thursday’s hearing to lay out the case for impeaching President Trump and plead for Republicans to look beyond their party, arguing that the president’s actions toward Ukraine go “beyond anything Nixon did.” Schiff argued that Trump’s abuse of power was clear and on a more significant scale than the Watergate break-in that eventually led to the impeachment of former President Richard Nixon. For whatever reason, Schiff stated, “The difference between then and now is not the difference between Nixon and Trump, it’s the difference between that Congress and this one. And so we are asking … where are the people who are willing to go beyond their party to look to their duty?” WATCH: Rep. Adam Schiff: “What we’ve seen here is far more serious than a third rate burglary of the Democratic headquarters.” “Where is Howard Baker? Where are the people who are willing to go beyond their party to look to their duty?” https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1197629141522075648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197629141522075648&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fadministration%2F471565-schiff-says-trumps-actions-go-beyond-anything-nixon-did POTUS called out Schiff for being the lying [insert word here] that he is. And in typical Trump fashion, he spoke the truth and did so with confidence. See for yourself… If Shifty Adam Schiff, who is a corrupt politician who fraudulently made up what I said on the “call,” is allowed to release transcripts of the Never Trumpers & others that are & were interviewed, he will change the words that were said to suit the Dems purposes. Republicans… https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1191155312084082688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1191155312084082688&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Ftrump-correctly-says-adam-schiff-would-alter-transcripts-of-impeachment-testimony-to-suit-the-dems-purposes%2F ….should give their own transcripts of the interviews to contrast with Schiff’s manipulated propaganda. House Republicans must have…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend