News

SCANDALOUS: Look Who’s Name Jame Comey Scrubbed From Report on Hillary

Published

3 years ago

June 15, 2018

It seems the controversy surrounding the FBI and their investigation into the use of a private email server by Hillary Clinton just keeps getting deeper and deeper. This is thanks in large part to a new report from the Department of Justice Inspector General.

All kinds of bombshells have come out in this report, including the fact that Comey himself conducted FBI business using a private email account. However, it seems we’re still at the beginning of the revelations to surface from the report.

Now it seems, Comey scrubbed Obama’s name from his report on Hillary. Things are not looking good for this guy right about now.

Trending: As If The Matt Gaetz Case Couldn’t Get Any Weirder…

Thanks for a Friday night news dump last September, we knew that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was emailing back-and-forth with President Obama using her private email address routed through her homebrew server. Don’t worry about national security, though: Obama used a pseudonym that not even Huma Abedin knew, so it was all very secure.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?

Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?
Do you think Cubans are fighting for healthcare or freedom from Communism?*

Healthcare

Communism

Not sure
Email*

Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

That fact came up Thursday with the release of the OIG report, but with a new twist: according to the report, Clinton “used her private email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries,” but the fact that she was corresponding with the president was scrubbed from James Comey’s exoneration. Instead, references to Obama were changed to “another senior government official” … and then even that bit was dropped from the final draft.

1. Hillary was unbelievably reckless.

2. Scrubbing the reference to Obama was an enormously consequential change. pic.twitter.com/n56lQhgaVQ

— David French (@DavidAFrench) June 14, 2018

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1007328938631335937

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1007330544965881856

Obama repeatedly said he first learned about its existence from the news. https://t.co/I6SlDEFrd0 https://t.co/JpoPP4uI3C

— James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) June 14, 2018

https://twitter.com/NoFilterNet/status/1007392000147181569

Isn't the fact that Obama knew and may have had his own private address within that server the motivation behind protecting her and thus him from investigation? https://t.co/sRFkhFQids

— WWG1WGA (@PickledPeach) June 14, 2018

Hillary was the opposite of reckless. This is the coverup. She knew exactly what she was doing by setting up the server and bleach-bitting it. She was hiding things she knew were there. https://t.co/dWHLroMVBY

— Truth, Liberty, Fun, ⏳ #PardonAssange (@AndrewJSweeney) June 15, 2018

"while in the territory of a foreign adversary" https://t.co/ohR6Ex0Fzy

— ???? Overpaid Washington Lawyer ???? (@OLobbyist) June 14, 2018

A lot of the focus will obviously be Clinton/Trump but the Clinton/Obama stuff in the IG report is absolutely bananas. Always good to have friends in high places. https://t.co/jBg1KTjllo

— Ryan Molnar (@Ryan_Molnar) June 14, 2018

Please, someone define: "Smidgen" https://t.co/YfbbTPOrmi

— BrownSkin (@BrunusCutis) June 14, 2018

https://twitter.com/BrowningMachine/status/1007334391557869568

Hillary was the opposite of reckless. This is the coverup. She knew exactly what she was doing by setting up the server and bleach-bitting it. She was hiding things she knew were there. https://t.co/dWHLroMVBY

— Truth, Liberty, Fun, ⏳ #PardonAssange (@AndrewJSweeney) June 15, 2018

And the media still expects us to believe Obama was a “scandal free” president with a straight face? Yeah, don’t think that’s going to happen.

The former president was corrupt well before this information was discovered, having allowed the IRS to target people based on their political beliefs and doing next to nothing to fix the VA, allowing many of our nation’s bravest soldiers to die from lack of care.

Who knows what else we’re going to find out about Comey and the FBI in the coming days and weeks?

Source: Twitchy

Facebook Twitter Gab

News

US Pop Star Offers to Pay Fines For Olympic Team Protesting Skimpy Outfits

The IOC wants the women to remain scantily clad, and this is undoubtedly on account of their incessant greed.

Published

2 hours ago

July 26, 2021

Andrew West

Facebook Twitter Gab

The Olympics may have built themselves as some sort of prestigious and untouchable global event in years past, but the last few decades have revealed just what a shady cash-grab the games have become. It all began in the 90’s when the financially-struggling Winter Olympics added snowboarding to the games, in a move that was blatantly meant to generate ad revenue from the emerging sport and its fans. In this quest to cash in, the International Olympic Committee refused to allow any actual snowboarding organizations participate in the operations, which drove several of the world’s best to boycott. This, in turn, completely ruined the concept that the gold medalists were truly the best in the world, and exposed the IOC as nothing more than a marketing firm. Now, in 2021, a number of female athletes are complaining that they are being forced to wear skimpier clothes than their male counterparts, (often in the same discipline), to which the IOC responded with a “be quiet and play” sort of attitude. Again, the skimpier outfits equate to more ratings, so Olympic organizers are refusing to make accommodations. This has led US pop star Pink to step up. US pop star Pink has offered to pay the fines handed out to the Norwegian women’s beach handball team, after they wore shorts like their male counterparts instead of bikini bottoms. The team was fined 1,500 euros (£1,295) for “improper clothing” at the European Beach Handball Championships last week. “I’m very proud of the Norwegian female beach handball team for protesting sexist rules about their uniform,” tweeted the singer on Sunday. “Good on ya, ladies,” she added. “I’ll be happy to pay your fines for you. Keep it up.” In doing so, the Olympics will get their coveted cash and these female athletes will be able to perform…

Facebook Twitter Gab

News

GOP Rep. Says There’s ‘Credible’ Evidence of Wuhan Lab-Leak Theory

China has been avoiding any such investigation for months now.

Published

2 hours ago

July 26, 2021

Andrew West

Facebook Twitter Gab

From the very moment that the COVID-19 pandemic began, there were concerns that China wasn’t telling us the truth. This was primarily based on Beijing’s horrendous record of dishonesty when it comes to the international community, which has been ever-so frequent in cases in which the Chinese government could be made to appear cruel or uncaring. To be fair, it doesn’t take long for most to realize that this is, in fact, reality, especially as we continue to receive credible reports of the nation’s use of concentration camps and ethnic cleansing. In the case of the coronavirus, not only did the world discover that the data coming out of Beijing was wholly incorrect, but that a laboratory specializing in the exact type of coronaviruses that caused COVID-19 happened to be just a few miles away from the epicenter of the pandemic. Now, despite numerous attempts to stall or stymy efforts to investigate the theory that pandemic began as a lab-leak, one US lawmaker is claiming that there is credible evidence of just such a possibility. Sunday, on FNC’s “The Next Revolution,” Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) stressed the importance of investigating the origins of COVID-19, and in particular, China’s role. His statement was stern. “As you know, we still have yet to have any notice that there will be an investigation. And so I think, rightfully, we used the powers of oversight that we have in Congress and we convened a hearing. Unfortunately, none of the Democrats attended that hearing. But the expert testimony from the witnesses was quite profound and quite significant. “And I think as they said, and I would tend to agree that this virus came from the laboratory, whether it was a leak, whether it was accidental, whether it was intentional, whether it was manmade or whether it…