Connect with us

Opinion

Social Media ‘Pogromming’ — An Opinion Piece on Silicon Valley Giants & Big Tech

That’s not America…

Published

on

It was just a couple of months ago that representatives of the social media cartels – Facebook, Google/YouTube and Twitter – swore with doe eyes before Congress that they don’t suppress, blacklist or blackball anyone save those who overtly advocate violence or other illegal things.

“Anyone can Tweet” – excluding links to the New York Post stories about Hunter Biden that Twitter and the members of the cartel pogrommed from view –  Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey had the audacity to say.

Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook has made similarly audacious claims. “We try very hard to give people a voice,” he said earlier this year.

Trending: Dem. Mayor Calls Deadly Pride Parade Car Crash ‘Anti-LGBTQ Terrorism,’ Then the Truth Came Out

Two months hence and we can see how truthful they were in the form of their un-personing of the president of the United States and anyone who dares to defend him – or question the recent election. We can literally see it in the form of screen shots advising the Wrongthinkful that “this video has been removed for violating terms of service” and blank screens and blackouts generally – as just happened most obviously to Parler, which has been pogrommed out of existence via the suspension of its ability to publish.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This is quite something given it was encouraged to publish by the Tech Oligarchs as an alternative to their platforms. Don’t like it here? Well, go found your own outlets, they said. Which is just what Parler did but when that became a threat to their platforms – in the form of people in droves Parlering rather than Tweeting and Facebook Liking – down came the hammer.

Amazon Web Services – controlled by Amazon, which is controlled by Leftist tech billionaire Jeff Bezos – simply pulled the plug on Parler, which made the mistake of contracting with AWS for its web hosting. AWS claims Parler was pogrommed because of user posts that advocated “insurrection” and violence but the real reason was inadequate “moderation” of all posts – including those merely Wrongthinkful – which must be “moderated” (i.e., suppressed) according to Big Tech’s “standards” and “community guidelines.”

These “standards” and “guidelines” are as opaque as they are authoritarian in that the “violation” is almost never specified – except in the vaguest, most general terms – and because there is no appealing an algorithm. Especially when the algorithm’s programming is a Big Tech secret.

No human being can be called or emailed to find out why, exactly, something was “flagged” – that is to say, purged – and there is no recourse but to accept it and understand that they can purge anything they like anytime they like for any reason they like – and there’s nothing little old you can do about it.

Of course, everyone knows exactly what the “guidelines” and “standards” are. They are the “guidelines” and “standards” of the rabid Left, which no longer makes any bones about its determination – as expressed by its actions – to shut down anyone who disagrees with anything the Left says everyone must agree with.

The list is as endless as the Left’s grievances and as rancid as its hypocrisy. Just after AWS pogrommed Parler – claiming that AWS is a private company and privately owned companies have every right to not do business with those with whom they disagree – other adjuncts of the cartel, Facebook and Twitter, ululated in outrage when a North Idaho Internet Service Provider (ISP) blocked access to FB and Twitter, citing the same arguments used by Facebook and Twitter (and AWS) to pogrom out of the public space any who dare to disagree.

The ISP – YourT1WIFI – acted in a far less totalitarian manner than the Pogrommers. YourT1WIFI didn’t simply cancel FB or Twitter but instead gave customers the option of being on a “no-block” list that would allow them to access FB and Twitter if they wished to.

Imagine that. The freedom to choose. To decide for oneself what is worth reading and seeing as opposed to being told what you’re allowed to read and see.

YourT1WIFI says it was trying to make this point by doing what it did. “The decision to do so wasn’t of a partisan nature but meant to represent a ‘moral high ground’ of fair and decent communication.”

We can’t have that anymore – but will, if the Left is allowed to become the moderator of “acceptable” speech.  
 
Because the Left will not brook disagreement. Anywhere.

Retired baseball legend Curt Schilling just reported his insurance has been cancelled because of his views. “It was a management decision that was made collectively between underwriting and marketing teams that could not be overturned,” his insurer – AIG – told him. 

Schilling says it was because of his Wrongthinkful support of President Trump.  Will you be debarred from banking – and grocery shopping – because you are Wrongthinkful? 

The pogromming will not stop with social media – unless it’s stopped by decent people who’ve had enough of economic and social violence being visited upon them by people who posture as defenders of “openness” and “diversity.” Which is only “open” if you’re mind is closed – and as “diverse” as agreeing with everything the Left says you must amen – and never daring to disagree with anything the Left says you must amen and awoman to. 

That’s not America – and Americans shouldn’t tolerate it.

A.J. Rice is CEO of Publius PR, a premier communications firm in Washington D.C. Rice is a brand manager, star-whisperer and auteur media influencer, who has produced or promoted Laura Ingraham, Judge Jeanine Pirro, Monica Crowley, Charles Krauthammer, Alan Dershowitz, Roger L. Simon, Steve Hilton, Victor Davis Hanson, and many others. Find out more at publiuspr.com.

Opinion

New Poll Delivers Big Blow to Democratic Voting Initiatives

Looks like they’ll be coming back to the negotiating table with their tails between their legs.

Published

on

One of the most intense fights that we are set to see on the American political stage over the course of the next few years will undoubtedly be about voting rights, and rightly so.  This is an issue that is intrinsic to the freedom of our nation, as secure and fair elections are the only way in which we can truly exercise our democracy. The issue has been foolishly split down the middle, into the predictable party pools where the narrative will mutate and radicalize until the argument is far from the middle ground it deserves, and a stalemate occurs in Washington DC. And while our elected imbeciles officials continue to play politics with this all-important issue, the American people have let their opinions be known in a recent poll that seems to contradict much of what the Democratic position has become of late. Amid plenty of partisan rancor over election integrity and voter suppression, a new national poll indicates that most Americans support requiring voter identification to cast a ballot and easier access to early voting. And a survey by Monmouth University released on Monday also indicates that the public is more divided on expanding voting by mail. Eight out of 10 of those questioned in the poll support requiring voter ID, including 91% of Republicans, 87% of independents and 62% of Democrats. Just over seven in 10 – 71% – say in-person early voting ahead of Election Day should be made easier. That includes 89% of Democrats, 68% of independents and 56% of Republicans. Voter ID has been a key sticking point in negotiations over future elections, with Democrats showing little enthusiasm for requiring American voters to provide identification to cast their ballots. This latest poll seems to weaken their position in the argument, however, and could send…

Continue Reading

News

Tone-Deaf Portland Runs Tourism Ad After Riot Police Quit En Masse

If you’re looking for chaos, have we got the vacation spot for you!

Published

on

For months on end, a never-ending series of protests-turned-riots have plagued the city of Portland, Oregon. Night after night the northwestern locale rages, as protesters march in the street, commit arson, clash with cops, and generally relish in their new role as liberal nuisances to the citizens of the city. Things have gotten so bad, in fact, that a large contingent of the city’s riot police coordinated a mass resignation from that portion of the force. That makes the timing of the city’s latest tourism push all the more asinine. Portland ran a pricy full-page Sunday ad in the New York Times promoting tourism after the Portland police riot squad quit Thursday. “Some of what you’ve heard about Portland is true. Some is not. What matters most is that we’re true to ourselves,” Travel Portland wrote in the ad that could have cost up to $250,000. “You’ve heard a lot about us lately. It’s been a while since you heard from us,” it continues. “After a year of encouraging visitors and locals to support small businesses here and from a distance, it’s time to issue an invitation to come back to Portland,” the ad states. “Two sides to the same coin that keeps landing right on its edge. Anything can happen. We like it this way.” The ad also says “new ideas are welcome” in the city, a place where “you can be yourself.” “This is the kind of place where new ideas are welcome — whether they’re creative, cutting-edge or curious at first glance. You can speak up here. You can be yourself here,” it continues. Of course, the taxpayer money used to procure this ad could have been spent on any number of the projects that would have helped secure the city from these anarchistic rabble-rousers.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week