Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Supreme Court Turns Wildly Left on Abortion Matters

This looks like Ruth’s doing.

Published

on

abortion

Just moments after President Trump made a bold and stern statement on abortion at the State of The Union, the left has already begun to push back.

After all, it is their idea to allow infanticide to become the new norm in late term pregnancy termination.

We would hope that at least the Supreme Court would err on the side of life, right?  Well, apparently not.

Trending: BOMBSHELL: New Report to Show Obama Interfered MORE Than Putin In 2016 Election

A divided Supreme Court stopped Louisiana from enforcing new regulations on abortion clinics in a test of the conservative court’s views on abortion rights.

The justices said by a 5-4 vote late Thursday that they will not allow the state to put into effect a law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined the court’s four liberals in putting a hold on the law, pending a full review of the case.

President Trump’s two Supreme Court appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh, were among the four conservative members of the court who would have allowed the law to take effect.

Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion in which he said the court’s action was premature because the state had made clear it would allow abortion providers an additional 45 days to obtain admitting privileges before it started enforcing the law.

The move comes just days after Virginia and New York made maneuvers in the abortion game that would allow fully developed children to be aborted up to the moment of birth.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

George Conway Sets Twitter Ablaze with Ridiculous Trump Nickname

George Conway is at it again, and this time he’s using the 5th grade tactic of name-calling.

Published

on

George Conway

By week’s end, the President was facing opposition from nearly all ends of the political spectrum, as controversies continue to swirl around his first term. For many democrats, the redacted version of the Mueller report was inadequate, and not because of the redactions themselves.  Instead, concerns over Robert Mueller’s lengthy outlining of possible obstruction of justice infractions has caught their eye, seeing this new avenue of thought as a possible catalyst for nullifying the will of the people in the 2016 election. Naturally, this has led to a bevy of information requests, subpoenas, and threats from the left side of the aisle, aimed directly at the White House. For their part, the Trump administration is doing everything in their power to move on, and get back to the business of governing our fine nation.  Trump has even commanded his subordinates to simply ignore Congressional subpoenas – something that puts those working for the President between a rock and a hard place. The strife isn’t only coming from Congress, however, as the husband of one of the President’s most trusted advisers weighs in as well, resorting to name-calling late in the week. George Conway, husband to White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, went off on a Twitter rant Thursday morning attacking President Donald Trump, bestowing him with a new nickname: “Deranged Donald”. The conservative lawyer — and high-profile Trump critic — was set off by a report that the president promoted a baseless accusation that the United Kingdom helped the Obama administration spy on his campaign — just one day after accepting an invitation for a state visit to Britain from Queen Elizabeth II. “Deranged Donald is at back at it again,” Conway wrote. “Deranged Donald can do things like this and it’s not even the top of the news, because it…

Continue Reading

News

BOMBSHELL: New Report to Show Obama Interfered MORE Than Putin In 2016 Election

WELL, WELL, WELL!!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Now that President Trump has been cleared of “colluding” with Russia during the 2016 election, more and more information points to the Obama White House’s wrongdoing. It looks like a new report, set to drop in May or June, will show that Barack Obama interfered more in the 2016 presidential election that Russian President Vladimir Putin. Former US Attorney Joe diGenova recently appeared on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle.” He noted, “The Horowitz report is coming out in May or early June. There’s another report that everyone has forgotten about involving James Comey alone. That will be out in two weeks. That report is going to be a bombshell. It is going to open up the investigation on a very high note and there are going to be criminal referrals in it.” WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWH8i5jQNPM MORE: BREAKING: FBI agents Joe Pientka and Mike Gaeta, along with DOJ official Stu Evans, are figuring prominently as witnesses in IG Horowitz’s investigation of department FISA abuses. The findings in the forthcoming IG report are said to be “devastating.” https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1121483182250110981?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1121483182250110981&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2019%2F04%2Fbreaking-update-findings-in-the-upcoming-ig-report-are-said-to-be-devastating-obama-interfered-in-election-more-than-vlad-putin%2F DEVELOPING: It is now looking as though there is more evidence that Obama had a heavier hand in interfering in the 2016 election than Putin https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1121507179385819136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1121507179385819136&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2019%2F04%2Fbreaking-update-findings-in-the-upcoming-ig-report-are-said-to-be-devastating-obama-interfered-in-election-more-than-vlad-putin%2F Businessman Donald Trump was thinking about the idea of a Trump Tower in Russia in 2015, 2016-ish. Naturally, some paired this deal (that was never made) to Trump working with the Russians to defeat Hillary Clinton. Conservative rock star Mark Levin, lawyer and radio host, explains the legal consequences President Trump could be facing. Hint: sorry liberals. Listen: https://soundcloud.com/conservativereview/levin-shouldnt-we-be-cheering-that-the-president-is-guilty-of-nothing “People keep saying, ‘What are the legal implications for Trump?’ There are none. Zero. There’s no legal implication; there’s no legal jeopardy, period. Moreover, in all this so-called reporting and analysis by these phony experts, where did President Trump collude,…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend