News
SURPRISE, SURPRISE: Salon Writer Makes Disgusting Comment About Abortion and Families


Mary Elizabeth Williams is a writer for uber liberal publication Salon, so it comes as absolutely no surprise that she would, at some point, say something completely stupid, vile, and wretched about abortion.
After all, stupid, vile, and wretched are the perfect words to describe the kind of worldview that is being promoted by websites and blogs like Salon. The shoe’s a size nine and it fits just right.
So what did she say? She said that murdering unborn babies was “good for families.”
Trending: Maxine Waters Escapes Censure, Goes on MSNBC to Gloat
In a piece published in Salon on Wednesday, Williams commenced with the argument that a woman who is a mother can be just dandy if she gets an abortion:
take our poll - story continues belowCompleting this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.The voices of the anti-choice movement have a specific vision of their enemy. It’s a selfish, reckless young woman who believes in abortion out of “convenience.” It certainly couldn’t be a man, because men don’t care about these things. It couldn’t be a woman who understands the experience of motherhood, because once you hold a little baby in your arms, you could never condone abortion.
In her latest effort, Williams continued, “Here’s a simple inconvenient truth opponents of choice don’t want to acknowledge — for a lot of women, abortion makes their future families possible. My friend’s entire adult life, a life that includes three great kids, would be unimaginable without the abortions that have also been a part of it.”
Anyone else notice the plural here? Her friend had “abortions,” meaning not just one, but multiple ones, multiple murders of her own precious children. What kind of sick and twisted human being does something like that and then seems satisfied with their choices?
What’s really shocking is the fact that it never dawned on this friend to use a condom. Or to, gee, maybe not bother having sex at all if she wasn’t going to commit to the adult responsibilities that come along with it. Sex is for grown-ups. If you aren’t ready to act like a grown-up, keep your panties on. It’s really that simple.
Williams posited that the real fulcrum for the pro-life movement was not to protect the babies in the womb, but instead “a fury over women controlling their own lives.”
Williams concluded, “I get truly scary vitriol sent my way regularly, but it really ramps up whenever I express the fact that I’m a mother who supports choice and who wants my teenage daughters to have the freedom to choose when and if they have children. This means access to birth control, morning after pills and abortion. Because I love them more than anything in the universe and I want them to be educated, independent, and healthy. People who want to protect their daughters are called mothers. And people who are frightened of that prospect are called misogynists.”
What Williams doesn’t seem to grasp is that this has nothing to do with choice. If these people were really “pro-choice” they would be all about giving the unborn the choice to live. What it’s really about is having sexual pleasure and fun without any of the responsibility. It’s indulging fleshly desires without worry of consequence. This is what these misguided dolts think “empowerment” means.
It’s sacrificing human babies on the altar of convenience, an offering to the god of self and pleasure. It’s a deplorable act of murder and idolatry, an insult to the glory of God of the highest order.
God have mercy on this vile woman and those who think like her.
Source: The Daily Wire
News
Amazon Rolls Out Creepy ‘Pay By Palm’ Hardware at Whole Foods
Is this one of the harbingers of a cashless society?


Throughout much of modern history, Americans and their cash were two separate things. One was a human being, breathing and walking about, earning money. The money was an inanimate commodity of varying value that we used to keep the organism alive, fat, and happy. But in the future, it seems as though we may find ourselves intrinsically, and anatomically indistinguishable from our bank account. In fact, it appears as though Amazon is banking on it. Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) said it is rolling out biometric technology at its Whole Foods stores around Seattle starting on Wednesday, letting shoppers pay for items with a scan of their palm. The move shows how Amazon is bringing some of the technology already in use at its namesake brick-and-mortar Go and Books stores to the grocery chain it acquired in 2017. The system, called Amazon One, lets customers associate a credit card with their palm print. It offers a contact-less alternative to cash and card payments, Amazon said. Of course, the move is being regarded as a terrifying leap into Orwellian territory by privacy experts, as it appears to push us ever closer to a cashless society where hackers and power failures could doom us all to poverty in the blink of an eye.


The politicization of American sports has been ongoing for some time, perhaps decades, but the most recent acceleration of this melding has come thanks to the power of social media and the blurring of the line between celebrity and athlete. At the forefront of this movement has been the NBA, and, more specifically, superstar LeBron James. This week, James came under fire for a tweet in which he referenced the Derek Chauvin trial’s guilty verdicts, with a photo of another officer who was involved in the shooting of a young black girl and text stating “you’re next”. The tweet was seen as a threat by many, including the Fraternal Order of Police who responded harshly. On Wednesday, James tweeted a photo of the officer involved in the shooting with a caption reading “YOU’RE NEXT #ACCOUNTABILITY.” The tweet has since been deleted. James was reacting to the deadly police shooting of 16-year-old Ma’Khia Bryant. Hours later, the National Fraternal Order of Police tweeted a photo of James’ original tweet, saying: “[email protected], with his vast resources & influence, should educate himself and, frankly, has a responsibility to do so, on the facts before weighing in. This is disgraceful & extremely reckless. The officer saved a young girl’s life. No amount of gaslighting will change that fact.” James attempted to walk back the tweet after deleting it, by issuing an explanation that garnered only a lukewarm response online.
-
Opinion4 days ago
What Does Bill Gates Plan to Do After He Vaccinates the World Population?
-
News3 days ago
Liberals Furious Over Stanford Study that Found Masks are Useless Against COVID
-
News5 days ago
Black Man Brutally Attacks Mexican Woman He Thinks is Asian
-
News6 days ago
A Perfect Example How the Media Lies to Push a Left-Wing Agenda
-
News4 days ago
Manhunt Ensues After Possible Ex-Cop Commits Massacre in Texas
-
News6 days ago
Mother of Woman Killed by Police Blasts BLM for Misusing Daughter’s Name
-
News6 days ago
Chelsea Clinton Wants Tucker Carlson Banned From Facebook (and She’s Making Up What He Said)
-
Opinion2 days ago
Biden Comment on Chauvin Trial Stuns Legal Observers
-
Opinion2 days ago
K-Mac Drops the Hammer on Mad Max with Official Censure
-
News4 days ago
Pro-Trump Lawyer Drops Huge ‘Q’ Hint, Crowd Goes Wild
-
News3 days ago
Apple Backs Down, Will Allow Parler Back on App Store
-
Politics4 days ago
Fauci Says We Still Cannot Eat Indoors Despite Vaccinations and Falling Virus Numbers