Connect with us


The DOJ, FBI and Facebook Share A Common Thread

We see every day the abuse of power and that the law doesn’t matter.



As of now, the FBI and Justice can’t seem to be able, to tell the truth, it’s just that simple. In a Rasmussen survey, people said, “ Half Say that the FBI, and DOJ Broke the Law to Block Trump Presidency.”

On the other hand, Pew Research found an astonishing fact that just 13 percent of Americans believe that the media does an excellent job covering both sides of political issues fairly. The survey also finds that a somewhat more significant number, 22 percent, believe that the media does not do this well at all.

Then there is Facebook, in a Business Insider survey they found that 81% of people surveyed said, “have little to no confidence Facebook will protect their data and privacy. The results also reported a massive, 58% of respondents said they were not at all confident about security.

Trending: General Flynn Gives Major Endorsement to QAnon Slogan

On April 9, 2018, Facebook began notifying 87 million users that their personal data may have been breached.  Just a few days ago Facebook admitted that 3 million additional user accounts were hacked. In reaction to these attacks Facebook commented, “we have no way of knowing if even more accounts have been hacked.”

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The common thread among the three is a loss of trust. The FBI and Justice are out there to protect our rights and yet there is mounting evidence that the leadership of both agencies were breaking the law themselves.  They were trying to change the outcome from the election and after Hillary lost they were and are I sill believe trying to get rid of the President even if it means they will break the law to achieve that end. They think their purpose is the high ground and to achieve their goal the law doesn’t matter. Too many of the people in high places in the FBI and Justice Departments believe they are not subject to the law, and it is unimportant to them that our rights are also under attack. We see every day the abuse of power and that the law doesn’t matter. If the law enforcement leadership don’t believe in the law then what do we as a nation stand for?

The Constitution explicitly gives the Congress oversight for the FBI and Justice Department, and yet the leadership of these two agencies believes that it is the other way around. FBI and Justice think they get to decide what and when the Congress sees evidence. If the police believe that they are not accountable to anyone, then we no longer have a Democracy.

I’m in “Facebook jail” I have been locked out of my Facebook account. So I can no longer use Facebook as a platform to market my books. When I tried to find out why I was banned, this is the response I got from Facebook. “Upon investigation, we have determined that you are ineligible to use Facebook. Unfortunately, for safety and security reasons, we cannot provide additional information as to why your account was disabled. This decision is final.”

Does this Facebook statement sound like the same words coming from Justice and the FBI when the Congress asks for information on the actions of the agencies as part of their oversight responsibility? Facebook has made a decision, and they don’t have to give me any specific reason why they have banned my books. The FBI and Justice don’t tell Congress why they are not responding they say, “we’ll get it to you in the future.”

Facebook in their decision to ban my books decided to affect my life.  For the most part, many of the people in government will not challenge the FBI or Justice and many oversight committees in the past have refused to call them out to prove what they say and are doing is legal.

Who has the oversight responsibility for Facebook? The boards of directors of Facebook have that responsibility, but are they doing their job? “The sheer volume, magnitude, and frequency of Facebook’s controversies strongly suggest that the company’s whack-a-mole approach is insufficient.  Facebook needs to institutionalize stronger risk oversight mechanisms,” Trillium Asset Management said in a letter to fellow Facebook shareholders.

In June 2014, Harvard Law scholar Jonathan Zittrain wrote an essay in the New Republic called, “Facebook Could Decide an Election Without Anyone Ever Finding Out,” in which he called attention to the possibility of Facebook selectively depressing voter turnout. In his recent testimony before Congress Zuckerberg said to Texas Senator Cruz, “Silicon Valley “Extremely Left-Leaning” Place, “I Understand your concern.

I hope that we can drain the swamp and bring back prestige, honesty, and integrity to the FBI and the Justice Department. It is also my hope that boards of directors like those at Facebook will protect the rights of all of their users and never again allow their company use the words, “ Upon investigation, we have determined that you are ineligible to use Facebook. Unfortunately, for safety and security reasons, we cannot provide additional information as to why your account was disabled. This decision is final.”



Daunte Wright Pulled Over for Open Warrant Related to Armed Robbery, Choking A Woman

Wright choked a woman and stole $800 from her!!

John Salvatore



Minnesota is once again on fire, this time due to the death of Daunte Wright at the hands of now-former police officer Kim Potter. Potter pulled her gun on Wright, but meant to fire her taser. Is the MSM asking why Potter was forced to pull out a weapon in the first place? Meaning, what actions did Wright take that made Potter act? Wright couldn’t have been resisting arrest, right? He was completely compliant…right!?? It’s all a moot point, now. And the Gopher State will continue to burn. From Fox News: Daunte Wright, the 20-year-old Black man shot by a police officer in a Minneapolis suburb Sunday afternoon, had an open warrant for his arrest related to an aggravated armed robbery attempt when he was killed, according to court records. Wright and another man, identified as Emajay Maurice Driver, a high school acquaintance, had both been charged with first-degree aggravated robbery in a December 2019 incident in Osseso, Minnesota, Hennepin County District Court documents obtained by Fox News show. Here’s a little bit more, but CLICK THE Fox News LINK ABOVE TO READ THE WHOLE STORY!! JUST DO IT! Around 2:30 a.m., two women at the home told Wright and Driver they needed to leave, but the two men said they did not have a ride, the documents say. The women reportedly allowed Wright and Driver to spend the night. In the morning, one of the two women left the apartment to get $820 in cash to pay the other for rent. After paying the rent, she left for work. […] Wright then allegedly choked the woman while trying to pull the cash out from under her bra, where she had tucked it away. BLM and lefties are always, always, always defending criminals. Sad.

Continue Reading


Dem-Controlled House Unveils ‘Court Packing’ Legislation, Want 13 Justices on SCOTUS

Just 13? Why not 19? Better yet, 89!!! SMH.

John Salvatore



All politicians are crooked. That isn’t exactly a secret. But at least Republicans actually love their country. That’s a huge difference. Not great, but it’s something. These Democrats, though, only care about one thing. They crave it, in fact. Complete control. From Fox News: Democratic lawmakers are set to unveil legislation Thursday to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court. More from The Intercept: The bill would add four seats to the high court, bringing the total to 13 from the current nine. The bill is led by House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler, Subcommittee chair Hank Johnson, and freshman Rep. Mondaire Jones. In the Senate, the bill is being championed by Ed Markey of Massachusetts. The number of justices on the Court, which is set by Congress, has fluctuated throughout the course of the nation’s history, reaching as many as ten seats before settling on nine in 1869. In 2016, Sen. Ted Cruz suggested that, if Hillary Clinton were elected, the Republican Senate should keep Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat empty, effectively bringing the number of justices down to eight. Republicans currently hold six seats, while Democrats hold just three. Republicans were able to solidify control of the Court under former President Donald Trump, after first refusing to advance Merrick Garland’s nomination under former President Barack Obama, and then confirming Justice Neil Gorsuch after Trump’s election. Then, after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg died in September 2020, Republicans threw out the procedures they had previously embraced and confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett in a matter of weeks. By expanding SCOTUS under a radically far-left president, socialists liberals will be able to ensure they get their way on every issue – all. the. time. That is, of course, GOD-willing, until a Republican gets back into the White House. If that…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week