Connect with us

News

The Inevitable War Between Feminism and Transgenderism Has Begun

is the new battleground for the fight over identity politics.

Published

on

Transgender

There can be no real diversity without equality and freedom, and the United States of America has been attempting to prove that for nearly the entirety of her existence.

I say “nearly” because we all know that there have been some inexcusable and nefarious periods in our history where things were not up to snuff.  Now, however, it does seem that a vast majority of the nation is on the right track, adhering to a Constitutional idea of equality.

The exception to this rule comes to us from the far left, however, where forced diversity and the idea of divisional politicking has created a number of opportunities to warp the wording of the Constitution itself.  Instead of “all are created equal”, the left seems hellbent on installing an ideology more akin to “we will make everyone’s results equal” – a dangerous precedent that de-prioritizes hard work and progress in lieu of comfort and entitlement.

Trending: Biden Refers to Cops As the ‘Enemy’ & Now Supports Cutting Police Funding — ‘Absolutely!’

In order to continue to bolster support for this ideology, the left is forced to segregate the population into tidy, little voting segments, telling each one of the so-called “snowflakes” that they are indeed unique, special, and deserving of wealth and fame.  One of the latest groups to be segregated in such a manner are those identifying as “transgender”, “non-binary”, or belong to other less common gender groups.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The problem here lies in the fact that, after this focus was sharpened in the last few months of the Obama administration, other human rights advocacy groups began to feel as though they were being shoved aside by the democrats in favor of their new pet project.

Now, one of Canada’s most prominent advocates of liberty is pushing back against her government and Twitter for what she considers complete and utter absurdity in their “hate speech” laws, specifically in the realm of transgenderism.

On Thursday, an ardent Canadian feminist who has supported the #MeToo movement but has opposed a bill that would encode gender identity and gender expression into Canadian law furiously revealed that Twitter wouldn’t let her say that men are not women.

Meghan Murphy, who founded the feminist blog and podcast Feminist Current in 2012, had tweeted in October, “Men aren’t women tho,” and “How are transwomen not men? What is the difference between men and transwomen?”

This didn’t sit well with Twitter, apparently.

On Thursday, Murphy revealed on Twitter that she had been notified by Twitter that her language in the tweet had violated their rules against hateful conduct.

Murphy was furious, and tweeted, “This is f**king bullshit @twitter. I’m not allowed to say that men aren’t women or ask questions about the notion of transgenderism at all anymore? That a multi billion dollar company is censoring BASIC FACTS and silencing people who ask questions about this dogma is INSANE.”

Murphy has long been an opponent to the government’s involvement in gender identification, issuing similar warnings to what Canadian author and lecturer Jordan Peterson has expressed concerns about in the past.

When she appeared before the Canadian Senate in 2017 to oppose bill C-16, which encoded gender identity and gender expression into Canadian law, Murphy stated, “Treating gender as though it is either internal or a personal choice is dangerous and completely misunderstands how and why women are oppressed under patriarchy as a class of people. … The rights of women and girls are being pushed aside to accommodate a trend.”

 

Save conservative media!

News

Widow Of Man Mary Trump Said Was Paid To Take SAT For President Trump Denies Claim

Published

on

The widow of a former friend of President Trump’s has come out and denied a claim that her late husband was paid to take the SAT for him, a claim that comes from the pages of a new book by Mary Trump, the president’s niece. Pam Shriver, who is a former tennis superstar and current tennis analyst, responded to the claim by denying any knowledge of her late husband, Joe Shapiro, having ever took the standardized test for the president. Here’s more information via The Washington Examiner: “When you put somebody’s name in print in a book, you want to make sure the facts around it are correct, especially if they are not living because it’s not like Joe is here and he would have known how to deal with this,” Shriver said in a video posted to social media on Wednesday. She also said her late husband met Trump during their time at the University of Pennsylvania, which would have been years after the president had taken the SATs, because he originally went to Fordham University for two years before transferring. “My late husband Joe Shapiro passed away 21 years ago. He was a man of great integrity, honesty; he was a hard worker. He was literally the smartest person I ever met,” Shriver added. The book by Mary Trump, Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created The World’s Most Dangerous Man contains the following passage concerning the allegation: “To hedge his bets, he enlisted Joe Shapiro, a smart kid with a reputation for being a good test taker, to take his SATs for him. That was much easier to pull off in the days before photo IDs and computerized records. Donald, who never lacked for funds, paid his buddy well.” There’s no actual proof this event…

Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court Says Manhattan District Attorney Is Allowed To Obtain Trump Tax Returns

Published

on

A new ruling handed down from the Supreme Court states that President Trump’s accountants will have to release years of financial records and tax returns to the Manhattan district attorney, ruling that he doesn’t have immunity from a grand jury investigation in NYC. Cyrus R. Vance Jr., who also happens to be a Democrat, a fact which will surprise absolutely no one, will now be allowed to the see returns in question after the justices voted 7-2 in favor of the release of the tax returns being released. Here’s more from The Washington Examiner: Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s two appointees to the court, joined the majority. However, Trump prevailed in the second case as the justices said it would not allow Congress to obtain tax and financial records, kicking the issue back to the lower courts. Unlike other recent presidents, Trump has refused to publish his tax returns and other financial papers that would provide a snapshot of his wealth. Back in May, there was three hours of oral testimony held by teleconference in which lawyers went back and forth over whether or not the House of Representatives and a New York prosecutor could subpoena Trump’s banks and accounting firm for his financial documents. There are three House committees who are seeking to get a peek at records from Mazars, the accountants for the Trump Organization, and two banks that gave loans to several Trump businesses. Democratic leaders think that the documents in question will give insight into whether or not Trump borrowed cash from, or had dealings with, Russian companies before taking office. Yes, that’s right. The left is still harping on the Russia nonsense, digging and rooting through every bit of garbage they can find to uncover whether or not there’s some sort of connection between…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend