Connect with us

Opinion

The ‘Insurrection’ Scam Lives On

“How do you stage an overthrow of government with no armaments?”

Jeff Davidson

Published

on

In 195 days, the November, 2022 elections will occur. As this election season heats up, rest assured that Democrats will heighten their misrepresentation of events that took place on January 6, 2021, and that they will be aided and abetted by a thoroughly corrupt corporate media. 

Democrats, as those within their own ranks are discovering, don’t have much to run on. Thus, portraying Donald Trump and his supporters, as well as Republicans in general, as insurrectionists is a notably convenient scare tactic to employ with legions of voters who don’t pay close attention to politics and only encounter screaming, bogus headlines and accompanying contrived sound bites.

So Far From Our Ideals

The United States of America was founded based on a constitution and amendments that guarantee rights to the individual; a republic where laws prevail, to be dispensed impartially; where unlawful search and seizure is not permitted; and where due process matters. 

We are supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave; the nation which immigrants from around the world yearn to reach; the beacon of democracy and the shining example on Earth of a free people in a free land. The sinister Biden Administration — and to be sure, it is sinister — has taken action unprecedented in our history. It has been treating those individuals who inhabited the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 in protest as if they are insurrectionist or murderous terrorists. 

The people who Biden is holding, in many cases for months on end in solitary confinement, are being denied their fundamental rights as American citizens. Yet, many of the people who entered the Capitol that day were ushered in by the Capitol guards. They simply walked through doors that were held open for them.

An Insurrection? Seriously?

The claims of insurrection are purely ridiculous. No one had weapons. How do you mount an insurrection with no armaments? Nearly all every Capitol occupiers had either a plane reservation or car ride ready for that evening or the next day. They did not intend to stay. What kind of insurrection lasts for 1/4 of a day? 

In short, no organized attempt to overthrow the government was underway, and every Biden official and every rational member of Congress knows that. The corporate media won’t tell you that the ranks of true Trump supporters were infiltrated by members of Antifa and by actual insurrectionists who sought to create a false flag, making it seem as if Donald Trump and Trump-inspired supporters intended to overthrow the U.S. government. 

Trump supporters were not seeking to overthrow the United States government; this is hogwash, known by anyone who is familiar with the facts. Ashli Babbitt, a U.S. Air Force veteran, was killed by a Capitol guard. She posed no threat and carried no weapon, and based on the more rambunctious activity of some Capitol occupiers did nothing to earn her fate.

The Shame of Biden and Company

Although innocent until proven guilty, many of the Americans held by the Biden Administration have been mistreated. The Administration and its undemocratic, unlawful, and Stalinistic approach to administering justice is bludgeoning attempts to ensure that these incarcerated individuals receive lawful and constitutional protections. 

Justice must be served before and during the legal proceedings for any of the incarcerated. Biden, the complete political puppet that he is, and his handlers, feel all-powerful however, and unconcerned with the law. They’ve got the sycophantic Elon Musk-hating press on their side as well as multi-millions of gullible Democrats, liberals, and progressives who believe that Biden is a kind man, that his administration is both fair and just, and that the Capitol occupiers are in league with the devil. As usual, the exact opposite is true.

Why not release to the public the film footage from inside of the capital, with no cuts on footage, and no bits and pieces here and there? We know why

The Endless Creation of Misinformation

As for the U.S. Department of Justice, for more than two decades and counting, the DOJ has engaged in egregious acts of prosecutorial misconduct. DOJ prosecuting attorneys seek convictions by any means necessary. If that involves withholding evidence, delaying court cases, and bleeding the persecuted financially dry, then have at it. Within a 97% conviction rate, as a nation, we have long ago crossed the line into banana republic territory.

The gatekeepers of information and communication in our society, and this includes the wannabe autocrats at Facebook, Google, Amazon, etc, but thankfully no longer Twitter, don’t fool us with their rigged algorithms and ‘community standards.’ The manipulation of the news, the views that they push, and the censorship in which they’ve been engaged, will not diminish us.

We know their end game: it is control of the masses, ever to be ruled by a fraudulently elected ruling class, backed by über-liberal billionaires who believe they are the anointed ones. As we approach November 8, 2022, expect to encounter endless coverage’ and social media manipulation that contorts the events of January 6, 2021, but don’t buy into it for even a nano-second.

Opinion

Pence v. Trump 2024? Former Veep Leaves the Door Open

WHOA!

Published

on

There has been an incredible amount of speculation as to whether or not Donald Trump will be again running for President in 2024, and there are a number of factors still at play that could create seismic shifts in the race to come.

For instance, if Trump’s former Vice President Mike Pence were to decide to run against him in 2024’s primary…

Mike Pence is not ruling out the possibility of going head-to-head with his old boss Donald Trump in a 2024 Republican presidential primary, a new report suggested on Monday.

‘We’ll go where we’re called,’ Pence told the New York Times when asked about the possible head-to-head.

‘That’s the way Karen and I have always approached these things.’

Trump was not thrilled with the idea.

Meanwhile Trump, despite not formally declaring a 2024 bid yet, has eyes on the competition – including Pence.

In a statement to DailyMail.com, his spokesman slammed his old deputy as ‘desperate’ and mocked him for trying to ‘chase’ his ‘lost relevance’ amid the former running mates’ latest divide over backing separate candidates in the Peach State’s gubernatorial election.

Former President Trump is said to be waiting until after the 2022 midterms to make an official announcement regarding 2024, but there have been plenty of hints regarding his potential campaign – the latest of which came from former First Lady Melania Trump.

 

There has been an incredible amount of speculation as to whether or not Donald Trump will be again running for President in 2024, and there are a number of factors still at play that could create seismic shifts in the race to come. For instance, if Trump’s former Vice President Mike Pence were to decide to run against him in 2024’s primary… Mike Pence is not ruling out the possibility of going head-to-head with his old boss Donald Trump in a 2024 Republican presidential primary, a new report suggested on Monday. ‘We’ll go where we’re called,’ Pence told the New York Times when asked about the possible head-to-head. ‘That’s the way Karen and I have always approached these things.’ Trump was not thrilled with the idea. Meanwhile Trump, despite not formally declaring a 2024 bid yet, has eyes on the competition – including Pence. In a statement to DailyMail.com, his spokesman slammed his old deputy as ‘desperate’ and mocked him for trying to ‘chase’ his ‘lost relevance’ amid the former running mates’ latest divide over backing separate candidates in the Peach State’s gubernatorial election. Former President Trump is said to be waiting until after the 2022 midterms to make an official announcement regarding 2024, but there have been plenty of hints regarding his potential campaign – the latest of which came from former First Lady Melania Trump.  

Continue Reading

Opinion

Verdict Reached in First Russian War Crimes Trial

This is just the first of many, certainly.

Published

on

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been a brutal one, and increasingly so as the Kremlin’s soldiers find themselves in more and more trouble of their own making.

As the war grows ever more impossible for Russia to win, the troops sent into Ukraine have been committing a series of worsening atrocities.  It’s terrorism at the least, (and very likely a full-fledge genocide), and it belies just how poorly things are going for Russia.

Now, in the first war crimes trial of the conflict, a verdict has been reached.

In the first of what could be a multitude of war crimes trials held by Ukraine, Russian Sgt. Vadim Shishimarin, 21, was sentenced for the killing of a 62-year-old man who was shot in the head in a village in the northeastern Sumy region in the opening days of the war.

Shishimarin, a member of a tank unit, had claimed he was following orders, and he apologized to the man’s widow in court.

His Ukraine-appointed defense attorney, Victor Ovsyanikov, argued his client had been unprepared for the “violent military confrontation” and mass casualties that Russian troops encountered when they invaded. He said he would appeal.

There was no doubt about the court’s legitimacy, either.

Ukrainian civil liberties advocate Volodymyr Yavorskyy said it was “an extremely harsh sentence for one murder during the war.” But Aarif Abraham, a British-based human rights lawyer, said the trial was conducted “with what appears to be full and fair due process,” including access to an attorney.

Given the sheer amount of heinous deeds the world has witnessed in Ukraine, there is no doubt that more war crimes trials will be coming.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been a brutal one, and increasingly so as the Kremlin’s soldiers find themselves in more and more trouble of their own making. As the war grows ever more impossible for Russia to win, the troops sent into Ukraine have been committing a series of worsening atrocities.  It’s terrorism at the least, (and very likely a full-fledge genocide), and it belies just how poorly things are going for Russia. Now, in the first war crimes trial of the conflict, a verdict has been reached. In the first of what could be a multitude of war crimes trials held by Ukraine, Russian Sgt. Vadim Shishimarin, 21, was sentenced for the killing of a 62-year-old man who was shot in the head in a village in the northeastern Sumy region in the opening days of the war. Shishimarin, a member of a tank unit, had claimed he was following orders, and he apologized to the man’s widow in court. His Ukraine-appointed defense attorney, Victor Ovsyanikov, argued his client had been unprepared for the “violent military confrontation” and mass casualties that Russian troops encountered when they invaded. He said he would appeal. There was no doubt about the court’s legitimacy, either. Ukrainian civil liberties advocate Volodymyr Yavorskyy said it was “an extremely harsh sentence for one murder during the war.” But Aarif Abraham, a British-based human rights lawyer, said the trial was conducted “with what appears to be full and fair due process,” including access to an attorney. Given the sheer amount of heinous deeds the world has witnessed in Ukraine, there is no doubt that more war crimes trials will be coming.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week