Connect with us

Politics

There Is A Serious Problem With James Clapper’s Remarks About The ‘Mole’ That No One Is Addressing

It was a long day with a lot of tough news, and the former Director of National Intelligence has just added to it.

Published

on

It’s been a long day with a lot of tough news, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has added to it.

He was interviewed on CNN on Thursday night.  In the course of the interview, Don Lemon quoted from one of Trump’s latest tweets.

[CNN’s Don] Lemon stated, “Here’s what the president tweeted this morning. He said, ‘Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI spied on the Trump campaign with an embedded informant. Andrew McCarthy says, ‘There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.’ If so, this is bigger than Watergate!’”

Trending: Schiff Accessed Private Phone Logs of Journalist, Giuliani, & GOP Rep. Devin Nunes [Details]

Lemon continued, “That is an extraordinary claim, and based on your experience, what is the likelihood that it’s true?”

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat will drop out of the race next?

  • Which Democrat will drop out of the race next?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Here’s how Clapper responded:

Clapper answered, “Well, I think this is hyperbole. They may have someone who was talking to them in the campaign, but the focus here, as it was with the intelligence community, is not on the campaign, per se, but what the Russians were doing to try to instantiate themselves in the campaign or to influence it or leverage it.”

Then Clapper made his outrageous statement: “So, if there was someone that was observing that sort of thing, that’s a good thing because the Russians pose a threat to the very basis of our political system.”

All right, so at least he didn’t say “kakistocracy.”

What saddens me is the deflection and faux moral posturing.  “Hyperbole”?  If the FBI had an informant in the Trump campaign, then it had one.  There’s no “hyperbole” involved in pointing that out.

Disputing whether the verb “to spy” applies, which seems to be what Clapper is getting at, is being disingenuous.  We’re not talking about 10-year-olds trying to peer into each other’s windows.  We’re talking about the FBI.  There’s no such thing as the FBI having informants monitoring your activities, and that not having weighty implications, about which there is no need to be “hyperbolic.”

But Clapper’s especially focused moral contradiction is the business about the Russians “posing a threat to the very basis of our political system.”

That has been the mantra of the Russiagate narrative, but no one ever defines it in a way that makes sense.  That’s pure demagoguery: an attempt to railroad people with trigger sentiments.  Sorry, I’m not selling America down the river for an emotional bumper sticker that has no meaning.

Here’s what has meaning.  The actual basis of our political system — which is about government that is consensual, limited, constitutional, and federal — is the U.S. Constitution.  The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution says the government can’t spy on the people except with probable cause, which means having the “criminal predicate” for a law enforcement operation that the talking heads were alluding to on Thursday.

Clapper apparently wants to gloss over the bright, constitutional line between spying on Russians (green light) and spying on the American citizens in the Trump campaign (red light, and you don’t move a muscle until it changes, after a judge agrees with your reasoning).

The Russians aren’t the threat to our political system here.  Careless obfuscators like Clapper are the threat to our political system.

THE FULL STORY CONTINUES HERE

 

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Trump-Critic Impeachment Witness Tells Democrats They Don’t Have Enough Evidence To Impeach

Published

on

Law professor Jonathan Turley has not at all been shy of offering President Trump a rather large dose of criticism over his time in the Oval Office, but he issued a rather strong warning to the House Judiciary Committee on the first day of impeachment hearings that they probably did not want to hear. According to the George Washington University professor of law, Democrats do not have enough evidence to legitimately impeach the president. Check out the details from The Daily Wire: The impeachment “is not wrong because President Trump is right,” says Turley in his 53-page opening statement. While Trump’s famous call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was “anything but perfect,” Turley argues, and a case for impeachment “could be made,” “it cannot be made on this record,” as all of the evidence has been second-hand at best. After explaining that he’s been “highly critical of President Trump, his policies, and his rhetoric, in dozens of columns,” and voted against him in the 2016 election — and for both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama before that — Turley makes the case that what the Democrats are doing by pushing forward with the partisan impeachment of Trump is actually “dangerous”: I would like to start, perhaps incongruously, with a statement of three irrelevant facts. First, I am not a supporter of President Trump. I voted against him in 2016 and I have previously voted for Presidents Clinton and Obama. Second, I have been highly critical of President Trump, his policies, and his rhetoric, in dozens of columns. Third, I have repeatedly criticized his raising of the investigation of the Hunter Biden matter with the Ukrainian president. These points are not meant to curry favor or approval. Rather they are meant to drive home a simple point: one can oppose President…

Continue Reading

News

President Trump Calls Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau ‘Two-Faced’ After He Is Caught Mocking Him On Hot Mic

Published

on

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was caught mocking President Trump on a hot mic during a NATO summit reception held at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday, while he was having a chat with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and French President Emmanuel Macron. This, of course, did not sit well with the president who fired back at Trudeau, calling him “two-faced.” Check out the details from The Daily Wire: “Is that why you were late?” Johnson, who appears amused, asked Macron. “He was late because he takes a 40-minute press conference off the top,” Trudeau interjected. https://twitter.com/PnPCBC/status/1202008162997538817 Asked about the viral video on Wednesday, President Trump took a swipe at Trudeau before offering some praise. “Well, he’s two-faced,” said Trump, who’s famous for coining memorable epithets for his political enemies. Trump shocked folks by following up his smackdown of Trudeau with some praise for the man saying, “And honestly with Trudeau, he’s a nice guy. I find him to be a very nice guy.” “The truth is I called him out on the fact that he’s not paying 2%, and I guess he’s not very happy about it,” Trump continued. “He’s not paying 2%, and he should be paying 2%. It’s Canada, they have money, and they should be paying 2%. So I called him out on that, and I’m sure he wasn’t happy about it. But that’s the way it is.” https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1202222191531704320 Trump isn’t the only world leader to take note of Trudeau’s apparent “two-faced” nature. Other critics of the Canadian prime minister have said the same thing, including Ezra Levant the founder of Canadian outlet The Rebel who tweeted the following: https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1202013710153388032

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend