Connect with us

News

Trump Admin Creates Coronavirus Task Force, CNN Bashes It For Not Being Diverse Enough

Does it get any sillier than this? Honestly?

John Salvatore

Published

on

The Trump administration could put a stop to the spread of the Coronavirus tomorrow and CNN would still be upset because too many white men helped solve the problem. It’s reasons like this that has America ready to re-elect Trump. Check this out, via CNN:

Washington (CNN)It’s a statement that’s as predictable as it is infuriating: President Donald Trump’s administration lacks diversity.

[…]

Trending: Maxine Waters Escapes Censure, Goes on MSNBC to Gloat

By contrast, former President Barack Obama’s circle of advisers in the face of the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa was hardly so monochromatic. Neither was it so abysmal in terms of gender diversity. (Of course, to contextualize, Obama’s administration, on the whole, was far more diverse than Trump’s.)

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

LOOK:

Democrats in Hollywood, Congress, and the mainstream media want the American people to believe that the United States has more liberals nationwide than it does conservatives. But that’s not really true, despite Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote in 2016 and illegals flooding into the country.

A whole bunch of conservatives didn’t vote for Trump the first time around because they thought he couldn’t win, based on biased/faulty polls showing Trump couldn’t win. Ultimately, a lot of folks stayed home assuming Hillary was going to win. Boy, how wrong they were.

Make sure you follow the right polls this year, people.

Most “Americans” who are against Trump tune into CNN. And that’s not because they trust the reporters on the far-left network, but because they know they’re going to hear what they want to hear. And that’s dangerous. At the end of the day, though, CNN didn’t end up doing so well in 2019.

But Fox News did!

From Daily Wire:

The increasingly openly left-leaning network, which has suffered a loss in viewership in recent years, saw another 9% decline in total viewers, according to Live+7 Nielsen ratings for 2019. Its primary left-leaning competitor, MSNBC, also saw a decline in total viewers, but at a third of the rate of CNN. MSNBC’s total viewers nearly doubled that of CNN.

Continued:

“Fox News averaged 2.5 million viewers per night in 2019, the most in its 23-year history, making the network the most-watched channel on basic cable,” The Hill reports. “According to Nielsen Media Research, Fox News beat out ESPN, with its 1.78 million viewers, and third-place MSNBC, which drew an average of 1.75 million viewers in prime time.”

WATCH:

This is @CNN, “the most trusted name in news.” Media “journalist” @brianstelter ended his Sunday show “Reliable Sources” with a segment telling viewers Trump is a “destructive cult leader” a kin to Jim Jones and using “mind control” to manipulate his supporters.

Reactions:

Stelter expert Steven Hassan has donated to Democrats, House candidate Alan Cohn and Sen. Maggie Hassan

You have to be kidding me?!? CNN is nothing more than a parody news network filled with clowns selling themselves as journalists.
Talk about desperation… 🙄

This is embarrassing, even for @brianstelter. (Which is saying something.)

At this rate, no matter how hard the left tries, it would appear Trump has 2020 all but in the bag.

Great for America, bad for the left. But what’s bad in the eyes of the left is usually good for the left – they just can’t see it.

Liberals. SMH.

BREAKING: New leaked video from inside CNN:

President Jeff Zucker tells employees to push “impeachment” and that all of CNN’s stories should be about “moves towards impeachment”

One of CNN’s employees says Zucker has a “personal vendetta against Trump”

News

Thus Far in 2021, Big Tech Has Cracked Down on Free Speech More than Ever Before

Only four months into this year, an analysis finds that Big Tech has worked to eliminate free speech more than ever before.

Published

on

Only four months into this year, an analysis finds that Big Tech has worked to eliminate free speech more than ever before. An analysis of these fascist efforts to end free speech on the Internet awarded Big Tech a bit fat “F” for its un-American efforts to aid and abet the far-left. Per the Media Research Center: At least 10 separate tech platforms silenced then-sitting President of the United States Donald Trump over the speech he gave in Washington, D.C. the day of the Capitol riot. Both Google and Apple pulled Parler from their app stores. Amazon Web Services also cancelled its contract with Parler, shutting the burgeoning social media site down for more than five weeks. Google removed LifeSiteNews from its advertising programs, and YouTube shut down its channel. YouTube demonetized Steven Crowder’s channels. Amazon removed Ryan T. Anderson’s book examining transgender ideology, and it also removed a Clarence Thomas documentary while continuing to sell at least 270 hate items. That consistent assault on free speech makes 2021 an ideal time to track the biases and failures of Big Tech. Starting with this quarter and going forward every three months, the Media Research Center’s Free Speech America operation will grade the top Big Tech companies, including social media, search media and others that form the backbone of our online lives. This quarter, Big Tech earned a collective “F.” Every one of the Big Tech companies reviewed got an “F” in free speech. That’s simply appalling. The quarter began with unparalleled restriction of the president of the United States. It was unquestionably the low point for online freedom since the creation of the internet. The MRC added its report card: The MRC went on in its report to detail all the reasons why each company in the graph above have…

Continue Reading

News

The ‘New York Times’ and Its Latest Two Giant Lies

There is no doubt that the ‘New York Times’ is an agent for America’s enemies, but its two recent lies are some of its biggest in years.

Published

on

New york Times

There is no doubt that the New York Times is an agent for America’s enemies, but its two recent lies are some of its biggest in years. One is the straight up lies about the death of Capitol Hill police officer Brian Sicknick. The Times and the left have been straight out lying about this man’s demise since the instant it occurred. Time and again the left has said as if it is a fact that officer Sicknick died as a direct result of the so-called “capitol insurrection.” We now know for a fact that he did not die as a result of anything that occurred during the riot. But more specifically, we have known since day one that the direct statements of fact uttered by the media has been a lie. They never had any truth or fact to back up their bald-faced lies about Sicknick’s death, and they knew it. As Issues & Insights noted: What did the Times base its story on? Unnamed sources, of course. There were no pictures. No videos. No on-the-record accounts. No medical examiner’s report. The story fell apart, as news emerged — no thanks to the mainstream press — that Sicknick had texted his family about being in good spirits that night. Then we learned that he’d returned to his office after the events at the Capitol, and only later went to the hospital. Why the medical examiner’s report didn’t come out until more than three months had passed is a mystery, but when it was finally released this week, it turned out that Sicknick had died of natural causes — from strokes — not from any injuries during the Capitol Hill melee. The Times could have — and should have — known that its story was false from the beginning, or…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week