Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Trump Announces Name of New Chief of Staff, & Conservatives Will Be ECSTATIC

This is exactly the right man to fill General John Kelly’s shoes. Agree?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Congressman Mark Meadows of North Carolina?

Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie?

Son-in-law Jared Kushner?

Trending: REVEALED: 2020 Dem’s Father Was Marxist Professor Who PRAISED Communist Manifesto

None of the above.

President Trump’s next (and third) chief of staff will be Mick Mulvaney, head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

He most recently served as the Office of Management and Budget director. While Mulvaney was named as an acting chief of staff, he will step down from his role as OMB director, a White House official said. A senior administration official said there is “no time limit” for Mulvaney to remain in the top White House post.

Mulvaney could lose the “acting” part of his title if things go well, according to another senior administration official.

It’s okay to be racist – if your target is white. Agree or disagree?

MSNBC was pretty perturbed that Trump considered “six white guys” to be his next chief of staff.

From Free Beacon:

MSNBC hosts Stephanie Ruhle and Ali Velshi bemoaned the White House’s shortlist of potential candidates to be the next chief of staff being “all white guys.”

Ruhle: “You and I talk about business all the time. That’s a major position, and the six people that they have put out that are short-listed, are all white guys. I cannot think of one single public company right now, that if they had an open senior position like that or a board seat, you would never in 2018, say that the short list is one, two, three, four, five, six white guys.

WATCH:

Want to know a secret?

Barack Obama had four chiefs of staff over eight years.

All were white men.

A CNN host asked Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper (D), who is considering running for president, if America needs a “white guy” in the White House come 2020.

CNN host Alisyn Camerota asked Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper (D.) if 2020 is the right time for him as a “white guy” to run for president.

[…]

Camerota: “You know the debate that the Democratic Party is having right now. Is it time to have somebody of color and a woman and somebody younger or somebody more establishment?

I think the Democrats across the country are going to help decide that. I’m not sure it’s clear what is exactly needed. But I do know there are a lot of strong options, and that list shows the strength of the Democratic Party. They’re people from all walks of life.

WATCH:

What a time to be alive, huh? It must be nice to say whatever comes to mind and never get called out for it.

Sure, that’s why the First Amendment exists, and yet conservatives are held to a higher standard on nearly every subject.

Hillary Clinton can blurt out that all black people look alike, whether joking or not, and the media doesn’t bat an eye.

But imagine if President Trump said the same thing. Heck, imagine if a Republican candidate said the same thing.

There would be wall to wall coverage.

How about the time Clinton referred to black men as super predators?

The problem is hypocrisy – plain and simple.

Check out Hillary’s latest where she blasts Trump’s “streak of racism” and “whole package of bigotry” (despite no facts to back her claims)…

Hillary Clinton accused President Donald Trump of having a long “streak of racism” and “the whole package of bigotry” in an interview with The Guardian.

Clinton: “This is a person who believes in very little, but he does have visceral responses to what goes on in the world around him. He does have a strong streak of racism that goes back to his early years. I include his anti-immigrant tirades because he characterizes immigrants in very racially derogatory ways, but he was Islamophobic, he was anti-women, he really had the whole package of bigotry that he was putting on offer to those who were intrigued and attracted to him.

Clinton: “He was, from the very first day of his campaign, raising the [specter] of criminal immigrants and the like. So the anti-immigrant piece coupled with things that he said, the kind of people who supported him, former Ku Klux Klan members and the like, the message that we called the dogwhistle, was incredibly loud. It was: ‘I’m on your side because I don’t like the same people you don’t like. Or at least I’m going to say I don’t and that counts for something.’

Here are the six words Hillary uttered about black people:

I know they all look alike.

WATCH:

It didn’t matter that Google tried propping up Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign.

It didn’t matter that the media was on her side.

It didn’t matter that the Democrat National Committee rigged the primaries in her favor.

Everyone figured all of those things were happening, and she still lost to Trump.

What’s interesting, and sliding under the radar, is that a report claims the Clinton campaign and the DNC laundered $84 million in order to avoid campaign finance laws.

From Fox News:

EXCLUSIVE: The Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee allegedly used state chapters as strawmen to launder as much as $84 million in an effort to circumvent campaign donation limits, and the Federal Election Commission ignored complaints exposing the practice, a lawsuit filed Monday claims.

Hillary probably thought she was safe.

And yet, her private email server fiasco is back in the news.

Top aides say Clinton may very well run for the White House again in 2020, despite not being able to walk down a short set of stairs by herself.

Who could forget Hillary tripping down stairs while overseas?

WATCH:

What about her epic coughing fits out of thin air?

WATCH:

How about when Clinton needed help up the stairs at Aretha Franklin’s funeral?

WATCH:

According to an MIT professor, bots helped boost Hillary Clinton’s chances of success in 2016 over candidate Donald Trump.

Talk about backfire.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

After Notre Dame Fire, Man Arrested with Gas Gans in NYC Cathedral

The news comes just days after Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris was accidentally set ablaze.

Published

on

gasoline fire arson

The hellish blaze that engulfed Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris this week was a disheartening spectacle that none of us would ever hope to see again, anywhere in the world. For many, the timing of the inferno was almost too coincidental to be accidental, given that this is the beginning of Holy Week for the Christian faith, culminating with Easter Sunday in just a few days.  Online conspiracy theorists have long been trying to tie these threads together in order to fit their own narrative, mind you, complete with the occasional race-baiting insinuation that this was Islamic terrorism. To be clear, there is no evidence of a criminal act having taken place at Notre Dame. In contrast, however, police in New York City have arrested a man who looked to clearly be ready to reenact the Notre Dame blaze at Saint Patrick’s Cathedral just yesterday. A New Jersey man was arrested after entering St. Patrick’s Cathedral carrying two cans of gasoline, lighter fluid and butane lighters, the New York Police Department said, just days after flames ravaged the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris. The unidentified 37-year-old man had pulled up Wednesday night in a minivan outside the landmark cathedral on Fifth Avenue in midtown Manhattan, walked around the area, then returned to his vehicle at 7:55 p.m. and retrieved the gasoline and lighter fluid, said NYPD Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence and Counterterrorism John Miller. That’s scary enough…but it gets stranger. “His basic story was he was cutting through the cathedral to get to Madison Avenue. That his car had run out of gas,” Miller said. “We took a look at the vehicle. It was not out of gas and at that point he was taken into custody.” The incident comes as another potential copycat criminal was found dead after “obsessing”…

Continue Reading

News

North Korea Taunts USA with New Weapons Test

North Korea has a history of diplomatic ebbs and flows, but this is the sort of bait-and-switch insult that could have Trump ready to wallop Kim Jong Un.

Published

on

Kim Jong Un

Perhaps it was always too good to be true. Donald Trump, a President who was widely lambasted by the liberal left on account of his political inexperience, became an unprecedented hero in an unlikely situation with North Korea early into his presidency. For reasons perhaps still unknown, Trump’s opening of a dialogue with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un suddenly seemed to bring the DPRK back into the global community.  Part of this resurgence included, as it must, a promise of denuclearization by the hermit kingdom. Somewhere along the way, things have fallen off the rails, likely at the behest of Kim himself. Now, ever more astonishingly, the dainty despot is pushing the envelope even further with claims of a new weapons test. North Korea said Thursday that it had test-fired a new type of “tactical guided weapon,” its first such test in nearly half a year, and demanded that Washington remove Secretary of State Mike Pompeo from nuclear negotiations. The test, which didn’t appear to be of a banned mid- or long-range ballistic missile that could scuttle negotiations, allows North Korea to show its people it is pushing ahead with weapons development while also reassuring domestic military officials worried that diplomacy with Washington signals weakness. And that’s not all:  The DPRK is also now taking pot shots at Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Separately, the North Korean Foreign Ministry accused Pompeo of playing down the significance of comments by leader Kim Jong Un, who said last week that Washington has until the end of the year to offer mutually acceptable terms for an agreement to salvage the high-stakes nuclear diplomacy. Both the demand for Pompeo’s removal from the talks and the weapon test point to North Korea’s displeasure with the deadlocked negotiations. Was this all a ruse by North…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend