Connect with us

News

Trump Responds With Two Strong Tweets After Dems Introduce Articles of Impeachment

He’s not wrong…

John Salvatore

Published

on

As well-informed Americans are now aware, Democrats have introduced two articles of impeachment against President Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of justice.

In other words, they got jack squat just like everyone always figured – but they’ve decided to press ahead anyway to save face.

Trump, predictably, was ticked off about the whole thing and decided to send a couple of tweets. See if you can find a single thing wrong with what he said…

Trending: Man Arrested for Rape Is Let Out of Jail Over COVID-19, Then Murders the Woman He Raped

LOOK:

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Nadler just said that I “pressured Ukraine to interfere in our 2020 Election.” Ridiculous, and he knows that is not true. Both the President & Foreign Minister of Ukraine said, many times, that there “WAS NO PRESSURE.” Nadler and the Dems know this, but refuse to acknowledge!

WITCH HUNT!

ANOTHER:

I don’t know what report current Director of the FBI Christopher Wray was reading, but it sure wasn’t the one given to me. With that kind of attitude, he will never be able to fix the FBI, which is badly broken despite having some of the greatest men & women working there!

WATCH:

FNC’s Baier: Turley proved that Dems would be committing “the high crime & misdemeanor”

Here are some more clips from the hearing…

Another…

Another…

One more…

Trump noted that liberal impeachment hoaxer Adam Schiff “is a nut job.”

The Democrats’ second witness in the sham impeachment trial was disgraced Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, an Obama holdover fired by Trump.

Trump sent a tweet about Yovanovitch during her testimony and liberals were quick to claim it was “witness intimidation.”

Jake Tapper was one of those people. However, the CNN host took a quick a thorough beating on social media. Because that’s what happened when libs don’t know what they’re talking about. They get crunched.

Here’s Jake’s tweet:

Amb. Yovanovitch testifies about POTUS and his team smearing her.

During her testimony, Pres. Trump goes on twitter and attacks her.

Asked for her reaction in real time, the witness says she finds the attack intimidating.

A potential article of impeachment, right there.

Here are some reactions explaining how Trump might’ve been out of line, but really didn’t do anything wrong…

1. Trump ridiculous to attack her this am.
2. Saying she was terrible and that he had constitutional authority to fire her is not witness intimidation which is “the threatening of a crucial court witnesses by pressure or extortion to compel him/her to not to testify”

Guys, we get that you feel Orange Man Bad deep in your bones, but this is almost too silly for words. Like, listen to yourselves.

Oh Jake
This is really sad

You need to relax & pace yourself
You’ve got five more years of this

Peak stupidity has been reached.

Clown show leader Adam Schiff (D-CA) also said Trump’s tweets were “witness intimidation.”

Schiff: “We saw today witness intimidation in real time by the President of the United States.”

Texas conservative Ted Cruz wasn’t about to let Schiff get away with it.

This may be the single most ridiculous claim of the Dem show trial. No, the President’s tweeting is not “witness intimidation.” You may not like the tone of some or even many of his tweets, but it’s absurd to suggest that tweeting is an impeachable “high Crime [or] Misdemeanor.”

H/T: Right Scoop

Save conservative media!

News

Man Arrested for Rape Is Let Out of Jail Over COVID-19, Then Murders the Woman He Raped

Still want to let criminals out?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Democrat policies made this unfortunate story possible. Liberal “leaders” won’t take any of the blame, though. Sure, the only person to commit a criminal act was Ibrahim Bouaichi, but he shouldn’t have been released from jail in the first place. Are Dems still cool with freeing bad people? From TDW: A Maryland man being held in a Virginia prison on rape charges was released over coronavirus concerns, then allegedly murdered his accuser, according to police. Police tracked down and found Ibrahim Bouaichi, 33, in Prince George’s County, Maryland, on Wednesday. Authorities sought Bouaichi in connection with the death of Karla Dominguez, who had accused Bouaichi of rape and testified against him in October, according to The Washington Post. CONTINUED: When police located Bouaichi, he fled in his car until he crashed. Police moving to arrest him found that he had apparently shot himself. Bouaichi remained in critical condition on Thursday. Partly on Dominguez’s testimony, Bouaichi was indicted on five felony charges of rape, sodomy, strangulation, abduction, and burglary. Bouaichi was held without bail in an Alexandria prison facility until April 9, when Circuit Court Judge Nolan Dawkins ordered his release on a $25,000 bond. VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbFRilEUmps

Continue Reading

News

Rashida Tlaib Forced to Repay Campaign Nearly $11,000 for Illegal Disbursements to Herself

Busted.

John Salvatore

Published

on

If Rashida Tlaib was a Republican and got caught illegally distributing funds from a campaign, there would be calls for her immediate resignation. But she’s a Democrat – so it’s all good. Nothing to see here, says the left. From Fox News: Rep. Rashida Tlaib has been ordered to repay $10,800 to her campaign committee to account for the salary she had paid herself from her campaign coffers after she had been elected to Congress in 2018. The bipartisan House Ethics Committee found the Michigan Democrat’s violation “was one of bad timing and not ill intent.” The committee ordered her to pay $10,800 of the $17,500 she received from her campaign in 2018. Congressional candidates are allowed to draw paychecks from their campaigns, but payments are only allowed during an active candidacy. Continued: “The committee did not find that she sought to unjustly enrich herself by receiving the campaign funds at issue,” the committee wrote Friday. “Indeed, during her campaign, Representative Tlaib received a conservative amount of campaign funds, well below the legal threshold for the maximum amount of salary she was eligible to receive; these payments allowed her to forego her salary from her full-time employment so that she could fully participate in campaign activities.” LOOK: https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1245428215751065602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1245428215751065602&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2020%2F04%2F01%2Frep-rashida-tlaib-reminds-us-the-covid-19-pandemic-is-exposing-structural-racism-in-the-us%2F REACTIONS:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

No articles were found at this time.

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend