Connect with us

News

Trump’s Approval Rating Surpasses Obama’s At Same Point In Their Presidencies

This one has to hurt…

John Salvatore

Published

on

This one is really going to hurt the Obama cultists’ feelings. They won’t believe the numbers, but that’s because Barack was a god to them. They don’t believe in Christ but whatever Barry said they took as gospel. Shame on them. That’s the problem with Democrats. They are too stubborn for their own good.

From Breitbart:

President Donald Trump’s approval rating has soared past that of ex-President Barack Obama’s at the same point in his administration, defying negative sterotypes driven by opponents as he became only the third president in U.S. history to be impeached.

Trending: Maxine Waters Escapes Censure, Goes on MSNBC to Gloat

Trump’s job approval rating 151 weeks into his presidency sits at 45 percent, as revealed by a Gallup poll last Wednesday. That puts Trump three points higher than the 42 percent approval rating Gallup found for Obama at the same point of his presidency.

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Democrats say the absolute darnedest things.

They think they are doing right by the people but can’t see how they come off as racist and ignorant by attempting to hand out free stuff, all willy-nilly.

It’s a shame that so many people remain in the dark politically, but that’s what will happen when most people in the news and entertainment businesses continue to spout falsehoods.

People like Thomas Bowen, a former Obama campaign aide, most likely get their news on President Trump and the GOP from the Instagram pages of rappers and actors.

And as long as that continues to happen, we will keep seeing statements like this one…

From Washington Examiner:

Thomas Bowen, a former campaign aide for Barack Obama, said he believed the Republican Party is “full of shit” after Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she was not impressed with the Democratic case for impeachment.

She should spend 15 minutes with Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, and Devin Nunes and then come back to us with how to make it work for Republicans.

This Party is so full of shit. It needs to be burnt to the ground.

How many times has the far-left media jumped to a conclusion about Trump and his administration before looking into the facts? Too many to count.

For example…

#BREAKING More than 100,000 children in migration-related US detention: UN

Here’s the retraction:

AFP is withdrawing this story.

The author of the report has clarified that his figures do not represent the number of children currently in migration-related US detention, but the total number of children in migration-related US detention in 2015.

We will delete the story.

Reactions:

Let’s withdraw this, because it happened in 2015, when Obama was President and Biden was Vice President.

Sounds fair🤦‍♂️

We’re deleting the story because how it makes the last president look.

oof, can’t let any news get out there that may make President Obama’s administration look bad. This was a close call, guys!! #ZeroScandals

I’ve lost count of how many “outrageous Trump-era immigration stories” have actually turned out to be from the Obama era. And every single time, the media/left just shrug and say “oh, well, that was different.”

Who was president in 2015?

“Children in cages” was totally fine when Obama was President

How many times now has it happened that people – with great preening & indignation – posted something online about the moral evils of Trump’s immigration detention centers, only to slink away when it turned out it was from Obama years?

Holy shit this is a huge error

News

Thus Far in 2021, Big Tech Has Cracked Down on Free Speech More than Ever Before

Only four months into this year, an analysis finds that Big Tech has worked to eliminate free speech more than ever before.

Published

on

Only four months into this year, an analysis finds that Big Tech has worked to eliminate free speech more than ever before. An analysis of these fascist efforts to end free speech on the Internet awarded Big Tech a bit fat “F” for its un-American efforts to aid and abet the far-left. Per the Media Research Center: At least 10 separate tech platforms silenced then-sitting President of the United States Donald Trump over the speech he gave in Washington, D.C. the day of the Capitol riot. Both Google and Apple pulled Parler from their app stores. Amazon Web Services also cancelled its contract with Parler, shutting the burgeoning social media site down for more than five weeks. Google removed LifeSiteNews from its advertising programs, and YouTube shut down its channel. YouTube demonetized Steven Crowder’s channels. Amazon removed Ryan T. Anderson’s book examining transgender ideology, and it also removed a Clarence Thomas documentary while continuing to sell at least 270 hate items. That consistent assault on free speech makes 2021 an ideal time to track the biases and failures of Big Tech. Starting with this quarter and going forward every three months, the Media Research Center’s Free Speech America operation will grade the top Big Tech companies, including social media, search media and others that form the backbone of our online lives. This quarter, Big Tech earned a collective “F.” Every one of the Big Tech companies reviewed got an “F” in free speech. That’s simply appalling. The quarter began with unparalleled restriction of the president of the United States. It was unquestionably the low point for online freedom since the creation of the internet. The MRC added its report card: The MRC went on in its report to detail all the reasons why each company in the graph above have…

Continue Reading

News

The ‘New York Times’ and Its Latest Two Giant Lies

There is no doubt that the ‘New York Times’ is an agent for America’s enemies, but its two recent lies are some of its biggest in years.

Published

on

New york Times

There is no doubt that the New York Times is an agent for America’s enemies, but its two recent lies are some of its biggest in years. One is the straight up lies about the death of Capitol Hill police officer Brian Sicknick. The Times and the left have been straight out lying about this man’s demise since the instant it occurred. Time and again the left has said as if it is a fact that officer Sicknick died as a direct result of the so-called “capitol insurrection.” We now know for a fact that he did not die as a result of anything that occurred during the riot. But more specifically, we have known since day one that the direct statements of fact uttered by the media has been a lie. They never had any truth or fact to back up their bald-faced lies about Sicknick’s death, and they knew it. As Issues & Insights noted: What did the Times base its story on? Unnamed sources, of course. There were no pictures. No videos. No on-the-record accounts. No medical examiner’s report. The story fell apart, as news emerged — no thanks to the mainstream press — that Sicknick had texted his family about being in good spirits that night. Then we learned that he’d returned to his office after the events at the Capitol, and only later went to the hospital. Why the medical examiner’s report didn’t come out until more than three months had passed is a mystery, but when it was finally released this week, it turned out that Sicknick had died of natural causes — from strokes — not from any injuries during the Capitol Hill melee. The Times could have — and should have — known that its story was false from the beginning, or…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week