Connect with us

News

Tulsi Gabbard Said Trump Supports Al Qaeda At Dem Debate. Just One Teeny, Tiny Problem.

This is just absurd.

Published

on

During Wednesday night’s Democratic presidential debate, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said that President Trump is supporting radical Islamic terrorist group Al Qaeda, the group that is responsible for carrying out the horrific 9/11 terrorist attack in New York.

There’s just one problem. That isn’t true.

More from Daily Wire:

Trending: Barack & Michelle Obama Purchase Home for Nearly $12 Million on Almost 30 Acres of Land

Gabbard stated, “So I enlisted after 9/11 to protect our country, to go after those who attacked us on that fateful day, who took the lives of thousands of Americans.”

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat will drop out of the race next?

  • Which Democrat will drop out of the race next?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Then Gabbard attacked Trump, snapping, “The problem is that this current president is continuing to betray us. We were supposed to be going after al Qaeda. But over years now, not only have we not gone after al Qaida, who is stronger today than they were in 9/11, our president is supporting al Qaeda.”

Gabbard attacking Trump for supporting al Qaeda was ironic considering that prior to the debate on Wednesday, three U.S. officials stated that intelligence reports acknowledged that Hamza bin Laden, the son and likely successor of former al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, was dead. CNN noted that a U.S. official informed CNN that the United States had a role in his death.

A report by the New York Times clearly states that Hamza bin Laden was killed within the last two years, during President Trump’s current time in office. The Times added that the United States played a role in the operation that led to this man’s demise.

Strangely, Gabbard seemed to completely ignore that news, which clearly points out that Trump is taking the fight to these disgusting degenerates. That hardly sounds like lending the group support. In fact, it sounds a whole lot like destroying the group’s leadership, which scatters the sheep so to speak.

Perhaps these politicians running for office need to do a much better job at researching the issues of the day before setting foot on the debate stage?

Save conservative media!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Washington Post Writer Says Journalists Need To Persuade Citizens To Support Trump Impeachment

Published

on

As the day and time draws near for the House of Representatives to vote on articles of impeachment, which are being drafted now, against President Trump, much of what the public thinks about this whole situation hasn’t changed all that much since before the public hearings began. Which is precisely why Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan is calling on journalists to try and find better ways to change hearts and minds on the issue and persuade Americans to get on board with booting the president. Here’s more from TheBlaze: “Despite the hardened positions, some members of the public are still uncertain,” Sullivan writes. “Some are persuadable, and yes, it matters. Maybe, just maybe, it’s the job of American journalism in this moment to get serious about trying to reach these citizens.” Sullivan notably does not take an overt position regarding whether people need to be persuaded for or against impeachment. The closest she comes to that is when she writes, “We do live in a country that abides by laws and a Constitution, and nobody ought to be above them.” “And far too often, those [television news] broadcasts fall prey to a false equivalency: This side said this, and this side said that, and we don’t want to make anyone mad, so we’ve got to cut to commercial now,” Sullivan writes. Sullivan speaks against “epistemological nihilism,” a term coined by New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg to describe the “long-term Republican strategy” of saying that there are no set facts or truth, something stated by House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins (R-Ga.) during Wednesday’s hearing. So what, exactly, does Sullivan purpose to help win folks over? How about a “movie trailer” kind of approach which takes big chunks of the impeachment narrative and condenses it into a “targeted, well-informed…

Continue Reading

News

Barack & Michelle Obama Purchase Home for Nearly $12 Million on Almost 30 Acres of Land

You’d be smiling too if you were a multi-millionaire…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Working in the public sector is not supposed to make people rich. For example, Barack and Michelle Obama were certainly not extremely well-off before Barry became president. But thanks to all the book deals and Netflix deals and this and this and that, the Obamas now live quite a comfortable lifestyle thanks largely to Barack’s time serving the American people. Ain’t that something? You can cripple a nation for nearly a decade, trash her, disparage her at every turn, and still wind up with millions beyond your wildest dreams!? God bless, America. From Daily Wire: The former President and First Lady received the keys to their new mega-home which occupies 29 acres of beachfront property. […] The house was originally listed for $14,850,000 but TMZ reports the Obamas managed to obtain a huge discount and secured the 6,900sq ft home for $11.75 million. PHOTOS: Most first lady’s don’t remain as active as Michelle after leaving the White House. The reason is simple: nobody cares what they have to say. Predictably, Obama doesn’t understand that. She appears to desperately need the attention. Check out the clip below where Michelle goes on NBC’s “Tonight Show” and mocks First Lady Melania Trump for bringing her a gift on Donald Trump’s inauguration day… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEkMp6J0YIM#action=share Of course, Michelle gifted Laura Bush on Barack’s inauguration day. Did she forget about that? Just attacking Melania to be cool and edgy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9Vw7Mx21A0#action=share During an interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts, Obama admitted she was at first skeptical of Barack. The reason? Because white people liked him. Roberts: “You– you weren’t overly impressed in the beginning?” Michelle: “I– I wasn’t, you know? I have my suspicions when a bunch of white folks fawn on over a black man ’cause I sorta think, ‘Okay, he can talk straight so they think…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend