Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

Unearthed Letter From George Washington Praises God for Ratification of Constitution

Too cool!

John Salvatore

Published

on

After spending decades in a private collection, a resurfaced letter written by America’s first president praises God for the ratification of the United States Constitution.

It is over 230 years old, dating back to 1788.

The price tag?

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: NEVER FORGET: Bernie Was Asked to Leave Hippie Commune for Refusing to Work

A cool $140,000.

From Fox News:

The letter to Richard Peters, speaker of the Pennsylvania House, is signed Sept. 7, 1788, and praises God for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

Written a week after Washington told Alexander Hamilton that he would likely accept calls to assume the presidency, the letter came at a time when the Constitution was under attack. Some states wanted to hold a second Convention that may have undermined the Constitution.

“It would seem from the public Gazettes that the Minority in your State are preparing for another attack of the – now – adopted Government; how formidable it may be; I know not,” Washington wrote. “But that Providence which has hitherto smiled on the honest endeavors of the well meaning part of the People of this Country will not, I trust, withdraw its support from them at this crisis.”

Zoom in to read:

New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the mayor of gaffe city.

Check it out as she misquotes the Constitution while threatening to run for president.

It might just be priceless…

From Daily Caller:

According to a recap in Politico’s Playbook, Ocasio-Cortez was doing a Politico photoshoot at Harvard University when she and a photographer joked about a potential presidential run.

Noting that the age to run for president is 35 and Alexandria is only 29, the photographer said: “You can’t even run for president for another six years.

Ocasio-Cortez: “No, not for a long time. Thank God. Although we’ve been joking that because the Equal Rights Amendment hasn’t been passed yet, the Constitution technically says he cannot run unless he’s 35. … So what we’ll do is we’ll force the Republican Party to pass the Equal Rights Amendment by threatening to run for president.

Uh, Alexandria? The constitution does not say “he.”

As Playbook notes, the Constitution does not say “he” cannot run — it says “any person.”

According to Article II Section I of the Constitution:

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

The mayor of gaffe city, the governor D’oh!-ville strikes again – with a vengeance!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Vladimir Putin Makes Hypersonic Missile Threat Against United States

At this time, it is believed that Putin’s hypersonic arsenal is “ostensibly invincible”.

Published

on

Russia

While the democrats secretly hope that Robert Mueller can prove that President Trump is some sort fo Russian asset, the Kremlin is making terrifying threats against the United States.

The absurdity of Mueller’s conspiracy cabal aside, the tension between the United States and Russia is at a level likely not experienced since the end of the Cold War.  Not only have both parties withdrawn from an important nuclear arms treaty in recent weeks, but President Trump was dealt an ugly hand when former President Obama took a few parting shots at Putin on his way out of the Oval Office.

Now, in a risky escalation of rhetoric, Russian President Vladimir Putin has made an overt and harrowing threat toward the USA.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered his version of a State of the Union address on Wednesday and included a threat to target the United States with ostensibly invincible hypersonic nuclear-capable missiles if the U.S. deploys intermediate-range ballistic missiles to Europe.

Putin’s threat was a response to U.S. withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, which the United States has long accused Russia of violating. Putin claimed those accusations were false and suggested Washington was merely looking for a pretext to scuttle the INF so it could deploy land-based missiles to Europe.

Putin insisted Russia will not be the first to deploy ground-launched ballistic missiles in Europe but will retaliate if America does so.

Putin’s hypersonic missiles are believed to be impervious to current anti-missile arrays and batteries due to their unfathomable speed of travel high in the earth’s atmosphere.

 

Continue Reading

News

CNN Airs Homophobic Rant on Roger Stone’s Prison Time…AGAIN

Shame on CNN, and shame on those who advertise with them.

Published

on

CNN

If you tend to watch the commercials that mainstream media have made for themselves in recent months, you would get one, singular impression:  That every news station is the only one telling the truth.

“Facts” and “truth” have been the premiere marketing buzzwords for mainstream media PR agencies, who are living in a world where the President routinely has to correct the White House press stable whose facts are, by default, a little more dated than the Commander in Chief’s may be.  CNN’s “Facts Matter” slogan is just one such example of the blatant push to legitimize a company whose funding comes from the same corporate interests who’ve muddied the waters of the Washington Swamp.

If we’re unable to at least admit those facts, we have no chance of growing past this oligarchical system we’re obliviously meandering around in.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So, in order to keep those corporate interests happy, CNN has to keep the ratings up.  The best way to keep the ratings up is to produce salacious and addicting content, filled with inflammatory emotion.  (It’s the same reason that reality TV is so invasively popular).

And that is why we have been subjected to, on more than one occasion, homophobic rants on the possible sexual assault of Roger Stone in prison.

CNN again publicly fantasized about that “dandy” Roger Stone getting raped in prison.

This time, it was David Gergen, one of the far-left network’s ancient analysts, who has not said anything interesting or insightful in decades. His job is to pretend to be a Republican and then bash Republicans in the way his media masters demand.

“Roger Stone must also worry that if he goes there — you know, he’s seen as something of a dandy — will he be physically safe? Will he be subject to rape?” Gergen said. “I mean, there must be a lot of things are going through his mind.”

And that wasn’t the first time either.

This is the second time a CNN leftist has planted the seed of Stone’s prison rape in the public’s mind.

Late last month, CNN anchor and anti-Trump activist Jake Tapper, in an obvious reference to prison rape, said Stone “might like” prison.

“No one’s going to cry if Roger Stone goes to jail or when he goes to jail,” former Obama adviser Jen Psaki said of Stone.

“He might like it,” quipped Tapper.

Psaki laughed and added, “He might. Who knows?”

Such a bigoted and insensitive narrative has no place in our homes, let alone while pumping corporate propaganda at us and using our own emotion to keep us watching.

Shame on CNN, and shame on those who advertise with them.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend