Connect with us

News

VICTORY: Supreme Court Makes Huge Decision Regarding Pro-Life Centers

Published

on

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of pro-life pregnancy centers in California by a vote of 5-4 that these facilities do not have to advertise abortion services, which amounts to a violation of the beliefs held by the individuals who run these centers.

This is great news as these establishments help provide help and hope in a variety of ways for women who find themselves pregnant and want to either keep the child or give it up for adoption, choosing to honor the life of an image bearer of God rather than murder their offspring for the sake of convenience.

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra concerned a 2015 law forcing pregnancy centers to provide written information advertising how to obtain abortions in the state at taxpayer expense, and requiring those without medical licenses to post disclaimers that they do not offer medical services. The National Institution of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) represented nearly 1,500 pro-life pregnancy centers opposed to the law.

Trending: Letter Threatens To Burn Down Homes Of Trump Supporters In New Hampshire: ‘You Have Been Given Fair Warning’

California argued that the law was necessary to prevent “deceptive advertising” by pregnancy centers, echoing a false claim commonly leveled at pregnancy centers across the country by abortion advocates. Pro-lifers responded by calling the requirements “compelled speech” that violated the First Amendment, and which would have dramatic ramifications for free speech and religious liberty if they were allowed to stand.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In a majority opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court struck down the law as a violation of the First Amendment. Thomas rejected California’s argument that “professional speech” was a separate category from that covered in the Bill of Rights, noting that “[s]peech is not unprotected merely because it is uttered by ‘professionals.’”

“As with other kinds of speech, regulating the content of professionals’ speech ‘pose[s] the inherent risk that the Government seeks not to advance a legitimate regulatory goal, but to suppress unpopular ideas or information,’” Thomas continued, noting that “[t]hroughout history, governments have “manipulat[ed] the content of doctor-patient discourse” to increase state power and suppress minorities.”

Abortion is not just one of the biggest threats to our liberty — it undermines the most fundamental right of all, life, and thus if it is destroyed our other liberties fall as well — but it is a heinous assault on the Creator of the universe who saw fit to make us in His image.

By murdering anyone, we violate his commandments and essentially spit in His face, stating that we do not care for his gift of life nor honor His law and authority.

Any society that is willing to murder its young, to deny them the right to live, grow, and thrive, sacrificing them on the altar of convenience is not only a murderer, but an idolator as well, worshiping themselves as god.

If we do not do something to dismantle this horrific practice, it will not be long before our freedoms fall, a sure judgment from a righteous God on a rebellious people.

Source: LifeSiteNews

Save conservative media!

News

Senate Judiciary Committee Sets Up Final Vote For Barrett Supreme Court Nomination

Published

on

The Senate Judiciary Committee is no doubt making liberals all across the country squirm today as they’ve voted to advance the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, setting a date of October 26 for the final vote. Liberals have tried their hardest to sabotage ACB, but unfortunately for them, her moral record is impeccable, her policies perfectly aligning with the Constitution, and her intellect far above their own. Democrats did not show up for the vote to advance Barrett’s nomination, boycotting the event because they’re angry about the fact her nomination is taking place so close to the 2020 presidential election. Boo hoo. via Washington Examiner: All Republicans voted in person. Before the vote, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham of South Carolina warned that Democrats “are going to regret it” and said it would further degrade the confirmation process. This is absolutely great news for Americans. Barrett has a well established reputation for being an “originalist,” which means interpreting the Constitution in the context in which it was written, instead of claiming it to be an “evolving document,” like many leftists do, which affords them the opportunity to twist the words of founders to mean anything they want. Here’s to hoping that along with her confirmation to the bench, we get another four years of President Trump to go along with it. Imagine what we could do if we won the White House, the House, and the Senate, with ACB on the bench? Freedom and liberty for all.

Continue Reading

News

Hunter Biden’s Laptop Shows He Was Sexually Inappropriate With Teen Girl, Says Giuliani

WHOA.

John Salvatore

Published

on

Could life by any worse right now for Hunter Biden? The guy must walk around with a rain cloud over his head all day long. But you can’t exactly feel bad for the guy. He created his own problems. Now, Rudy Giuliani is saying Hunter might be a pedo. From RealClearPolitics: Rudy Giuliani talks about “sensitive” material on the laptop of Hunter Biden including “numerous pictures” of underage girls and an alleged text message exchange he had with his father where he admits to a relationship with a 14-year-old girl and creating an unsafe environment for his children. LOOK: VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coFx3ZDXWrg&feature=emb_title From New York Post: The FBI subpoena of Hunter Biden’s alleged computer and hard drive came in connection with a money-laundering investigation, according to documents obtained by Fox News. The 2019 papers were verified by multiple federal law enforcement and government officials who reviewed them, but it’s unclear whether the investigation is directly related to the Democratic presidential nominee’s son. Sound off on Hunter in the comment section…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week