Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

VIDEO: Son Who Lost Mother in 9/11 Attacks Destroys Democrats For Using Victims as ‘Props.’ Here’s What He Had to Say.

Published

on

Nicholas Haros Jr. lost his mother, Frances, in the horrific terrorist attacks carried out by ruthless, blood thirsty Islamic radicals on Sept. 11, and the man is not at all pleased with how Democrats have turned victims into props to be used in what he calls “political theater.”

Haros Jr. spoke at a memorial service held on ground zero on Tuesday, the 17th anniversary of the attacks, where he put House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Cory Booker on blast for using his mother’s murder for the sake of pushing their own political agenda.

Haros was one of several people who read the names of New York victims during Tuesday’s memorial service. After reading his mother’s name, Haros explained his grievance.

Trending: WATCH: Anti-Trump Fox News Host Throws Hissy Fit After Mueller Report Vindicates Trump

“This year, a representative of the House referred to our loss as ‘just another incident.’ This year, a network commentator said the president’s performance in Helsinki was as ‘traitorous act’ as was 9/11. And last week, a senator attacked a Supreme Court nominee and called him a racist for alleged comments after 9/11,” Haros explained.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?

  • Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Stop. Stop. Please, stop using the bones and ashes of our loved ones as props in your political theater,” he declared. “Their lives, sacrifices, and death are worth so much more. Lets not trivialize them or us — it hurts. To my mom and to all of you and your loved ones, never forget.”

Haros’ request was met with resounding applause.

The comments from Pelosi took place during her weekly press conference the week of July 26, where she referred to the attack as an “incident.” She was doing her usual anti-Trump pushback, attempting to debunk the president’s claim that Democrats were total weak sauce when it came to border security. They are by the way.

Here’s what she said:

We have a responsibility to protect our borders. All of our borders. Let’s make no mistake about that. Democrats have been strong on that point. All of our borders.

In fact, I said to some of you before, when we had the 9/11 incident and the commission was formed — and they made their recommendations — they made recommendations to protect America, but the Republicans would never take them up. And some of it was about our borders. The Republicans would never take them up.

This is one of many things that makes liberalism an utterly disgusting ideology to hold to. According to the whole “Rules for Radicals” junk, you should never ever let a good tragedy go to waste. Meaning, whenever something really bad happens, exploit it for the good of your political agenda, regardless of how it might make others feel.

They manipulate people into thinking they care about others, about fairness and equality, but the truth is, they only want power. They have an insatiable appetite for it.

Let’s hope Haros’ words don’t fall on deaf ears and the left actually takes what this man said to heart.

Some things are beyond politicization.

Source: TheBlaze

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Beto Seemingly Calls for WAR Over Mueller Report Secrecy

The left just had to find some way to make the idea of transparency seem sensational, didn’t they?

Published

on

Beto O'Rourke

As the nation patiently awaits the findings of the Special Counsel report, a debate is raging. On both sides of the aisle, we are hearing that transparency is key.  Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General and self-proclaimed “heat shield” for Robert Mueller, has expressed his concerns over tarnishing the reputations of those not accused of a crime. The rest of America seems fairly well convinced, and rightly so, that there should be unfettered access to the report. And while this is undoubtedly a widely felt sentiment, the radical left just had to find a way to make it seem sensational. Cue 2020 presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke: “Republicans and Democrats should do whatever they can to make sure their constituents, the American people, can read that report, form their own judgement, make their own decisions, and that the truth comes out,” O’Rourke said at a campaign stop in South Carolina Friday. O’Rourke warned that America may not see another year if details of Russian interference in the 2016 election included in the Mueller report are not made public, saying, “This is an unprecedented attack on this country and on our democracy, and we are owed the facts. And if we do not receive them, 243 years in, there’s nothing that guarantees us a 244th.” O’Rourke is undoubtedly suggesting that a Civil War or revolution could take place over something that everyone already wants. Not only have a number of democrats parroted the “everyone should get to see everything” line, but they’ve done so in complete agreement with Trump-appointed Attorney General Bill Barr. For Beto to go nuclear in this statement is beyond bizarre, and sounds more like a coaxed soundbite than his true sentiment on the subject.

Continue Reading

News

Mueller Report Findings Expected by Congress Sunday

Monday morning’s water cooler chit chat has already been decided.

Published

on

russiagate

Is our long national nightmare actually over?  Well, that depends on who you ask today. For many, the completion of the Mueller report on Friday, without any additional indictments being suggest by the Special Counsel, was a huge win for President Trump.  It meant that there wasn’t evidence sufficient to bring charges against the President…perhaps. We should remember that the DOJ’s longstanding belief was that a sitting President could not be indicted. On the left side of the aisle, however, a tense wait has begun, with the Attorney General expected to hand off a summation of Mueller’s findings to Congress any minute. Attorney General William Barr was expected to release his first summary of Mueller’s findings on Sunday, people familiar with the process said, on what lawmakers anticipated could be a day of reckoning in the two-year probe into President Donald Trump and Russian efforts to elect him. Since receiving the report Friday, Barr has been deciding how much of it Congress and the public will see. Of course, for some democrats, this simply wouldn’t cut it. “I suspect that we’ll find those words of transparency to prove hollow, that in fact they will fight to make sure that Congress doesn’t get this underlying evidence,” Rep. Adam Schiff of California, chairman of the House intelligence committee, said on ABC’s “This Week.” His plan: Ask for information and if that’s denied, “subpoena. If subpoenas are denied, we will haul people before the Congress. And yes, we will prosecute in court as necessary to get this information.” For now, we will just wait and see. We do know one thing for certain:  Monday morning around the water coolor is going to be a happenin’ spot.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend