Connect with us

News

Warren Tells Crowd She Was Fired for Being Pregnant In 70s, But In 2008 Video She Clearly States It Was Her Decision

So, which is it?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Someone call an ambulance because Elizabeth Warren’s pants are on fire.

The 2020 Democrat frontrunner (according to at least one poll) recently said something about being fired in the 1970s that doesn’t match up with what she said in 2008.

How convenient.

Trending: McAfee Dead in Prison After Repeatedly Declaring He Would Not Kill Himself

Here’s the deal…

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration? (1)

  • Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

From Daily Wire:

On Wednesday, during a town hall in Nevada, she told the crowd she lost her teaching job in the early 1970s because she was “visibly pregnant.”

“By the end of the first year, I was visibly pregnant, and the principal did what principals did in those days — wish me luck and hire someone else for the job,” she told the crowd in Carson City.

Warren, 70, seemed to be implying that she was terminated simply because she was pregnant.

But a YouTube clip posted in January 2008 shows Warren giving a completely different reason for why she left that school.

WATCH:

Fox News:

“I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, ‘I don’t think this is going to work out for me,’” Warren continued. “I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about, thinking, ‘What am I going to do?’”

Reactions:

Why do Leftists always sensationalize their life experiences?

They always have to play the victim, it’s STOP for dems

Are you implying that @ewarren LIED!?!?! There is no way this “Native American” would bend the truth in order to advance her career all while trampling other, perhaps more deserving, people to get her way!

Does Warren lie about everything? She was not discriminated against. She was not qualified to teach special needs children.

She’ll do anything to pretend to be part of the victimhood club. Those who have been real victims of discrimination should be very offended.

She is clearly a compulsive liar. She keeps on doing it because for some reason she is massively successful despite being a completely phony human being. Honestly I don’t know how anyone can trust a word she says.

Elizabeth Warren, like Hillary Rodham Clinton, is a serial liar. We in Massachusetts are well accustomed to her self-indulgent creations/manifestations of the “truth.”

Because she always plays her victim card. I’m thinking it’s the only card she owns.

H/T: Twitchy

News

White House Announces Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

This could be a big boon for a number of American industries as well.

Published

on

Regardless of what you think of Joe Biden touting this latest infrastructure deal as a “win”, it sure is nice to see that our government isn’t completely and utterly broken in the 21st century. It took months of bickering and infighting, and more than a few moments of political pettiness, but it appears as though we may just have an infrastructure deal after all. President Biden announced on Thursday that the White House and a group of bipartisan senators had reached a deal on a $579 billion infrastructure plan. “It’s been a very long time since the last time our country was able to strike a major bipartisan deal on American infrastructure,” Biden said at the White House. Biden said he and congressional Democrats had to concede some on what’s known as “human infrastructure,” such as investments for childcare and spending on climate change. Democrats will instead look to pass additional spending in a separate bill through a Senate budgetary process called reconciliation, which requires only a simple majority to pass legislation. And, despite no one having seen the bill yet, Biden is confident that Congress will send it to his desk to sign in the coming days. The radical left will likely be the most disappointed in the bill, after having previously suggested a goal of a $10 trillion investment in climate change initiatives.

Continue Reading

News

Miami Building Collapsed After Years of Sinking into the Earth

Scientists has determined the issue years ago.

Published

on

Just north of Miami, in the nearby town of Surfside, there is a massive rescue effort underway as nearly 100 people remain unaccounted for in the wake of a residential high-rise’s collapse. That number was nearly double the early estimate, having risen dramatically on Thursday afternoon as more information became available to those leading the effort. The late-night collapse, which was captured on video by a nearby surveillance camera, appeared to be a sudden, freak accident, but new information seems to indicate that there might be more to this story. A Florida high rise that collapsed early Thursday was determined to be unstable a year ago, according to a researcher at Florida International University. The building, which was constructed in 1981, has been sinking at an alarming rate since the 1990s, according to a 2020 study conducted by Shimon Wdowinski, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environment. When Wdowinski saw the news that the Champlain Towers South condominium in Surfside had collapsed, he instantly remembered it from the study, he said. “I looked at it this morning and said, ‘Oh my god.’ We did detect that,” he said. But not everyone agreed with the assessment. Wdowinski said his research is not meant to suggest certainty about what caused the collapse. The building was sinking at a rate of about 2 millimeters a year in the 1990s, and could have slowed or accelerated in the time since, he said. In his experience, even the level of sinking observed in the 1990s typically results in impacts to buildings and their structures, Wdowinski said. He believes that very well could have been the case for the Champlain building in the 1990s, based on his findings. “It was a byproduct of analyzing the data. We saw this building had some kind of unusual…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week