Connect with us

News

WATCH: Bernie & Beto Speak At ‘Women Of Color’ Forum, Moments Later the Crowd Turns On Them

Well, ain’t that something!?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Two of the most liberal 2020 Democrat presidential candidates decided to attend the “Women of Color” forum.

Both are white males, despite a certain nickname of a former Congressman from Texas.

Both Bernie Sanders and Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke were heckled by an audience comprised of far-left progressives.

Trending: BLM Goes Into Target, Demands the Store Stop Calling Police On Black Shoplifters (Videos)

From Free Beacon:

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Sanders and O’Rourke, both white and male, were among several Democratic candidates for president to speak at the She the People presidential forum. The organization describes itself as “a national network connecting women of color to transform our democracy.”

Whereas Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) had “some breakthrough moments,” as MSNBC’s Hallie Jackson put it, Sanders and O’Rourke struggled.

Jackson noted, “Both got a little less than warm reception from the roughly 1,500 black, Latino, Asian, Native American, Arab American women in the room, with Sanders at one point even getting heckled.

Bernie said, “Black women will be an integral part of what our campaign and our administration is about.

WATCH:

Sanders recently appeared on a Fox News town hall. President Trump wasn’t a fan of the program and you’d have to imagine neither were most FNC viewers.

However, POTUS has a large social media platform and knows how and when to use it.

Here are his thoughts on the town hall. He wasn’t pleased.

LOOK:

So weird to watch Crazy Bernie on @FoxNews. Not surprisingly, @BretBaier and the “audience” was so smiley and nice. Very strange, and now we have @donnabrazile?

Sanders’ presidential campaign isn’t off to the best start.

While it’s likely the Democrat Socialist from Vermont will perform exceedingly well down the line in the primaries, he’ll have to deal with an FEC violation right now.

It appears the Bernie campaign broke federal law by employing an illegal immigrant.

Beto O’Rourke, truth teller?

Not so much.

In that respect, he actually fits in quite swimmingly with the other 2,385 Democrat presidential candidates.

Check this out…

From Daily Wire:

Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke made five false statements in an attack on President Donald Trump this week when he was confronted over why he compared the president to the Third Reich.

O’Rourke noted, “I compared the rhetoric that the president has employed to the rhetoric that you might have heard during the Third Reich. Calling human beings an ‘infestation’ is something we might have expected to hear in Nazi Germany.

He added, “Describing immigrants who have a track record of committing violent crimes at a lower rate than native-born Americans as ‘rapists and criminals.’ Seeking to ban all Muslims, all people of one religion, what other country on the face of the planet does that kind of thing or in our history or in the history of the western world?

Ryan Saavedra points out exactly where Beto was lying.

Listen to the clip below, then go back and read the bullet points within the tweet.

Democrat Beto O’Rourke lies a lot right here:

-Trump said “we have an ‘infestation’ of MS-13 gangs in certain parts of our country”
-The travel ban is not a Muslim ban
-Trump never said neo-Nazis and KKK members were “very fine people”
-The remaining comments need more context

Come on, “Beto.” Be better.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz is royally ticked off – and rightfully so.

Apparently, Reuters knew that O’Rourke was a bad apple during his Senate race in 2018 but said nothing.

Check out Ted’s tweet…

So Reuters had evidence in 2017 that Beto may have committed multiple felonies—which Beto confirmed on the record—but deliberately withheld the story for over a year to help him win his Senate race? But when he’s running against Bernie etc, NOW it’s news?

Save conservative media!

News

Minority Owners Of Washington Redskins Looking To Sell Stake In Team

Published

on

Three individual minority owners of the Washington Redskins professional football team are looking to sell off their shares in the team amid controversy over the team’s name. Again. Yes, it seems the Redskins are forever caught in a loop of having to defend their team name from the gaggle of social justice warriors running around the nation screaming and crying about faux systemic racism and crusading for causes like renaming sports teams in order to make themselves feel important and like they have a purpose. Here’s more on this from The Washington Examiner: Businessmen Robert Rothman, Dwight Schar, and Frederick Smith have hired an investment banking firm to conduct the search for potential buyers, which, according to one unnamed source, was happening because they are “not happy being a partner” of majority owner Daniel Snyder, the Washington Post reported. ProFootballTalk first reported that Schar and Smith were trying to sell their share of the team on Sunday. Rothman is chairman and CEO of Black Diamond Capital, a private investment company; Schar is chairman of NVR Inc., one of the largest homebuilder companies in the country; and Smith is the chairman, president, and CEO of FedEx, which has a long-standing partnership with the football franchise. Together, they account for about 40% of the team’s ownership. The remaining stake rests with Snyder, his mother, and his sister. The organization said on Friday that it will conduct a “thorough review” of the team’s name amid new demands that it stops referring to the team as the Redskins, which critics view as being racist and insensitive to Native Americans. Snyder released a statement last Friday saying, “This process allows the team to take into account not only the proud tradition and history of the franchise but also input from our alumni, the organization, sponsors,…

Continue Reading

News

Good News For Trump: SCOTUS Issues Ruling Against ‘Faithless’ Electors

Published

on

The Supreme Court ruled against “faithless electors,” allowing states to require presidential electors to vote for the candidates they are committed to, which is good news for President Trump just ahead of what is sure to be a very tight contest come November. Essentially, this means that electors can’t rebel and refuse to cast their votes for the candidate who won the state, therefore, if Trump wins a state, he gets all of the votes without worrying about losing any. The ruling strips a tool of dissension out of the hands of the left who aren’t above using any and every strategy at their disposal to stop him from having a second term. Here’s more on this from The Washington Examiner: The 538 members of the Electoral College are chosen based on the presidential vote in each state, and they, in turn, elect the president of the United States. States can require these electors to vote for the statewide winner or otherwise follow state laws, the court ruled. Justices decided against four 2016 Electoral College electors seeking to overturn state laws binding them to the presidential nominee to whom they are pledged. In that race, a record seven electors didn’t back the candidate to which they were pledged. A total of 10 electors rebelled last cycle, and seven of those votes counted toward the final tally. The overall results were 304 for Donald Trump, 227 for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, and others seven, instead of Trump 306 to Clinton 232. Four “faithless electors,” one from Colorado and another three from Washington, presented their oral arguments to the Supreme Court last month challenging the laws in 32 states and the District of Columbia. This is a good thing. Whoever wins a state should be entitled to those Electoral College votes. Period.…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend