Connect with us

News

WATCH: Beto Goes On MSNBC, Says Americans Will Be Happy to Hand Guns Over to Government

Yeah, I don’t see that happening. Do you?

John Salvatore

Published

on

Failed Senate candidate and soon-to-be-failed Democrat presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke often says some of the funniest things.

Very often.

His latest sentence on AR-15’s might just take the cake, though.

Trending: ‘Give Us Your Home!’ BLM Demands Homeowners ‘Give Black People Back Their Homes’

See for yourself…

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Beto again says he believes gun owners will turn in AR-15s if they became illegal and cops won’t go door-to-door: “So I believe that America will comply with the law…we expect people to follow the law and that’s certainly what I believe will happen.”

This is a useful point.

If people always followed the law, you wouldn’t need to confiscate AR-15s because of the whole murder being illegal thing.

Beto is admitting his confiscation plan is aimed at the law abiding.

Beto O’Rourke with another 🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥: “Texans who own AR-15s, they’ve told me, ‘I don’t need this. I don’t need it to hunt, I don’t need it to protect myself…if giving this back, or cutting it to pieces, or selling it to the gov helps to keep us safer, then by all means do it’”

More from MSN:

Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas has made his position on assault weapons crystal clear. “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” O’Rourke said during Thursday’s Democratic presidential debate. “We’re not going to allow it to be used against our fellow Americans anymore.”

To accomplish this, O’Rourke has proposed a mandatory confiscation of these guns whereby individuals would be compensated for their firearms.

Beyond the thorny politics of this proposal, it raises clear legal and logistical questions, including whether a president has the authority to confiscate people’s guns.

Boy, liberals literally don’t have one solid candidate running for POTUS.

Not one.

Once Beto is out, will the uninformed flock to Biden, Sanders, Elmo, Warren, Gabbard, Big Bird, Cookie Monster, or Castro?

Tough call.

Save conservative media!

News

Biden & Harris Refuse to Answer Questions From the Press — For Third Day In A Row (Video)

They must not have anything to say to the American people…

John Salvatore

Published

on

Donald Trump picked Mike Pence to be his vice presidential running mate in 2016 because the man was the chief executive of a state. Pence had gubernatorial experience, as well as a past in the lower chamber of Congress. Joe Biden, on the other hand, chose Kamala Harris to be his VP running mate because of the color of her skin. That’s literally the only reason. It was a purely political move, as the Biden camp knows they can call everyone racist if they say something negative about Harris – and the media will back them up. But Joe and Commiela had better be careful. If they continue to sidestep even liberal reporters, said liberal reporters are likely to become salty. WATCH: https://twitter.com/KLF/status/1294356550761549824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294356550761549824%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F Biden is now apparently for defunding law enforcement after many of his radical left-wing peers called for the move weeks ago. From Fox News: Joe Biden said in an interview Wednesday that some funding should “absolutely” be redirected from police, amid calls from some in his party to “defund the police” in the wake of the protests across the country. Biden’s campaign has said he does not support defunding the police. But in a Now This interview with activist Ady Barkan, the presumptive Democratic nominee said that police forces don’t need surplus military equipment, saying this is what leads them to “become the enemy” in a community. WATCH: https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1280904345408745472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280904345408745472%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F Here’s a longer version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppoUCQLSXFE&feature=emb_title WATCH: https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1280907262333087745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1280907262333087745%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fwatch-joe-biden-agrees-to-defund-the-police-says-he-supports-taking-away-their-responsibilities%2F

Continue Reading

News

Bill Barr: There Will Be ‘Significant Developments’ In Durham Probe Before November Election

It’s about time!

John Salvatore

Published

on

The Durham probe will leave yet another stain on Barack Obama’s record, showing how inept and corrupt the 44th president’s administration truly was. And it’s about time something got done. The left won’t pay much attention to this story, because they know they don’t want to know. You feel me? WATCH: https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1294086122558062592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294086122558062592%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fag-barr-says-there-will-be-significant-developments-in-durham-case-before-the-election%2F More from Fox News: Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, two sources close to the matter tell Fox News. Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation. Specifically, the inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was “not a source” for another government agency. Page has said he was a source for the CIA. The DOJ relied on that assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Keep America Great!

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

No articles were found at this time.

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend