Connect with us

News

WATCH: Democrat Says Trump’s Ultimate Goal Is to Eradicate People of Color

Tell us how you really feel!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Some people are just born liars, apparently.

Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal is one of them.

According to her, and probably millions of other Americans, President Trump’s ultimate goal is to make America “pure” and get rid of all people of color.

Trending: ‘You Don’t Have A Choice’ — ‘Normalcy Only Returns When We Largely Vaccinate the Entire Population’

No joke.

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

She actually went on MSNBC and said that.

The freshman Democrat said Trump’s “ultimate goal” with the wall and focus on immigration is to “make America pure.”

Jayapal: “This has never been about a wall. He actually could have gotten funding a couple of years ago, or a year ago, for a wall. It was part of a deal that was proposed. Not all of us agreed with that deal, but it was proposed to him and he turned it down because his ultimate goal is, as you said, to make America pure in the sense of not having immigrants, not having folks of color here and shutting down every form of legal immigration, all to throw a bone to those people.

WATCH:

It must be nice to say whatever comes to mind and never get called out for it.

Sure, that’s why the First Amendment exists and yet conservatives are held to a higher standard on nearly every subject.

Hillary Clinton can blurt out that all black people look alike, whether joking or not, and the media doesn’t bat an eye.

But imagine if President Trump said the same thing. Heck, imagine if a Republican candidate said the same thing.

There would be wall to wall coverage.

How about the time Clinton referred to black men as super predators?

The problem is hypocrisy – plain and simple.

Check out where Hillary blasts Trump’s “streak of racism” and “whole package of bigotry” (despite no facts to back her claims)…

Hillary Clinton accused President Donald Trump of having a long “streak of racism” and “the whole package of bigotry” in an interview with The Guardian.

Clinton: “This is a person who believes in very little, but he does have visceral responses to what goes on in the world around him. He does have a strong streak of racism that goes back to his early years. I include his anti-immigrant tirades because he characterizes immigrants in very racially derogatory ways, but he was Islamophobic, he was anti-women, he really had the whole package of bigotry that he was putting on offer to those who were intrigued and attracted to him.

Clinton: “He was, from the very first day of his campaign, raising the [specter] of criminal immigrants and the like. So the anti-immigrant piece coupled with things that he said, the kind of people who supported him, former Ku Klux Klan members and the like, the message that we called the dogwhistle, was incredibly loud. It was: ‘I’m on your side because I don’t like the same people you don’t like. Or at least I’m going to say I don’t and that counts for something.’

Here are the six words Hillary uttered about black people:

I know they all look alike.

WATCH:

https://twitter.com/OfficeOfMike/status/1057033388396367877?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1057033388396367877&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2018%2F10%2Fwatch-hillary-clinton-jokes-that-all-black-people-look-alike-video%2F

It didn’t matter that Google tried propping up Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential campaign.

It didn’t matter that the media was on her side.

It didn’t matter that the Democrat National Committee rigged the primaries in her favor.

Everyone figured all of those things were happening, and she still lost to Trump.

What’s interesting, and sliding under the radar, is that a report claims the Clinton campaign and the DNC laundered $84 million in order to avoid campaign finance laws.

From Fox News:

EXCLUSIVE: The Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee allegedly used state chapters as strawmen to launder as much as $84 million in an effort to circumvent campaign donation limits, and the Federal Election Commission ignored complaints exposing the practice, a lawsuit filed Monday claims.

The Committee to Defend the President (CDP), a political action committee formally known as Stop Hillary PAC, filed its complaint with the FEC in December 2017 with the claims that the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) solicited cash from big-name donors, and allegedly sent that money through state chapters and back to the DNC before ending up with the Clinton campaign.

As first reported by Fox News at the time, the CDP alleges in its complaint that about $84 million was funneled illegally from the DNC through state party chapters and back into the war chest of the Clinton campaign. The political action committee claims that even though the FEC acknowledged receipt of the complaint and claimed that an investigation would be conducted, the needle has barely moved.

Hillary probably thought she was safe.

And yet, her private email server fiasco is back in the news.

From Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch announced today that a hearing will be held in federal court Wednesday, November 14, 2018, on a motion to compel further testimony from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat John Bentel, as well as make public the audiovisual recordings of the depositions of top Clinton aides and State Department officials, including Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills.

Top aides say Clinton may very well run for the White House again in 2020, despite not being able to walk down a short set of stairs by herself.

WATCH:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IAyrDn7OxM#action=share

Who could forget Hillary tripping down stairs while overseas?

WATCH:

What about her epic coughing fits out of thin air?

WATCH:

How about when Clinton needed help up the stairs at Aretha Franklin’s funeral?

WATCH:

Save conservative media!

News

Seattle Police Chief Shreds City Council After Angry Activists Target Her Home

Published

on

The chief of police for the city of Seattle has come out hard against city council for allowing “mob rule” in the city after angry activists — the same folks who claim to be out for equality and tolerance — targeted her home over the weekend, which caused fear to spread among her neighbors. Folks, no matter what side of the issue you stand on, the fact that individuals are feeling threatened by acts of violence and rioting due to the work of these people and their unhinged behavior is totally unacceptable. Here’s more on this from The Daily Wire: “I wanted to update you on recent events, particularly those that occurred late last night,” Best wrote in a letter addressed to City Council President Lorena González and Public Safety Chair Lisa Herbold. “A residence of mine in Snohomish County was targeted by a large group of aggressive protestors late last night. My neighbors were concerned by such a large group, but they were successful in ensuring the crowd was not able to trespass or engage in other illegal behavior in the area, despite repeated attempts to do so. Currently, the local sheriff (not SPD resources) is monitoring the situation.” “I urge both of you, and the entire council, to stand up for what is right. These direct actions against elected officials, and especially civil servants like myself, are out of line with and go against every democratic principle that guides our nation,” Best continued. “Before this devolves into the new way of doing business by mob rule here in Seattle, and across the nation, elected officials like you must forcefully call for the end of these tactics.” “The events of this summer were initiated in a moment of grief and outrage over the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis…

Continue Reading

News

Ex-White House Spokesman Says Joe Biden Shouldn’t Debate President Trump

Published

on

One of the major benefits of having all of this coronavirus hoopla going on in our nation is that the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, Joe Biden, has an excuse to avoid public appearances and making a bigger fool of himself than he already has over the last 12 months. Then again, maybe that’s why the left is fighting so hard to keep mass gatherings limited or completely banned? Perhaps, just maybe, Biden’s campaign doesn’t want the guy to be able to debate Trump publicly for fear of how much of a fool he’ll look like and out of fear that the stupid things he says will be impossible to bounce back from? If you think that sounds far-fetched, check out what a former press secretary for President Bill “let’s party hardy at Epstein Island” Clinton said about Biden debating the president. He said Biden should just not show up. Here’s more from The Daily Wire: Joe Lockhart penned an op-ed piece for CNN in which he advises the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate to ignore the three debates, which begin Sept. 29. “Whatever you do, don’t debate Trump,” Lockhart wrote last week. “Trump has made more than 20,000 misleading or false statements according to the Washington Post. It’s a fool’s errand to enter the ring with someone who can’t follow the rules or the truth. Biden will undoubtedly take heat from Republicans and the media for skipping the debates. But it’s worth the risk as trying to debate someone incapable of telling the truth is an impossible contest to win.” Yeah. Or you could just admit that your candidate has clear mental health issues going on and you’re afraid he’s going to say something incoherent or outrageous that’s going to draw a lot of attention. Just tell the truth, folks. And…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend