Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

WATCH: Pelosi Asked to Name One of Beto’s Accomplishments, Can’t Name ANYTHING

TOO FUNNY!

John Salvatore

Published

on

Failed Senate candidate and former Democrat Congressman Beto O’Rourke has officially announced that he’s running for president.

Of course, in November 2018, Beto said he wasn’t running. So, that should tell liberals a lot about his character, right there.

Here’s his official announcement:

Trending: AOC Reveals Plans to Implement Gun & Immigration Changes — WITHOUT Congress

I am running to serve you as the next president. The challenges we face are the greatest in living memory. No one person can meet them on their own. Only this country can do that, and only if we build a movement that includes all of us. Say you’re in: http://BetoORourke.com

Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked to name Beto’s signature accomplishemnt while he was a member of Congress.

What happens next is pure Nancy.

She had nothing; no answer.

From Daily Wire:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi struggled to name a single accomplishment that former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) had while he was in the House of Representatives when she was asked by a reporter on Thursday during a press conference.

“Beto O’Rourke announced today that he is running for president,” NBC News’ Kasie Hunt said. “What in your view was Beto O’Rourke’s signature accomplishment as a member of the House?”

Pelosi: “Beto brought vitality to Congress…when he came, he came as a real champion for the environment. He got a great deal of support from the environmental community in his district, he won a primary on that subject.

Pelosi: “And, also, he was a member of the Armed Services Committee, a strong member of the Armed Services Committee, which is very important for his district. In preserving our planet and protecting our people, they’re at least two areas in addition to his vitality in so many different ways.

WATCH:

10,000 proud Americans filled an arena in El Paso, Texas where President Trump spoke on Monday night.

The venue’s capacity was only 8,000.

Thousands upon thousands of onlookers remained outside the arena, watching the speech on oversized screens.

Not far away, failed Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke held a counter-rally that was sparsely attended.

Beto had the audacity to tell his crowd that “walls don’t save lives, they end lives.”

WATCH:

Unreal, isn’t it?

The people of Texas nearly elected a man to the Senate who wants to ditch the United States Constitution.

O’ Rourke, who said he won’t but probably will run for president in 2020, thinks America needs to start over with new governing documents.

Beto: “I’m hesitant to answer it because I really feel like it deserves its due, and I don’t want to give you a — actually, just selfishly, I don’t want a sound bite of it reported, but, yeah, I think that’s the question of the moment: Does this still work. Can an empire like ours with military presence in over 170 countries around the globe, with trading relationships . . . and security agreements in every continent, can it still be managed by the same principles that were set down 230-plus years ago?

O’Rourke is vehemently opposed to building a wall on the southern border.

When asked how America can go about solving the crisis, Beto offered a poignant response: “I don’t know.”

Beto has been caught lying about his mother being a “lifelong Republican” and saying he did not flee the scene of a hit and run accident (he actually did).

An undercover video reveals Beto’s team is using campaign funds to aid the migrant caravan making its way through Mexico to the United States.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Wikipedia Joins Censorship Racket with ‘Paid Protection’ Posts

As if it weren’t enough to have the mainstream media’s infotainment imbecility on our doorstep, Wikipedia is now coming under fire for malfeasance as well.

Published

on

wikipedia

In society today, there is an embarrassing reality that we must face, in which information is so readily available that entire cottage industries have sprung up around the idea of herding and hoarding such knowledge. Of course, it all began with the mainstream media; an “infotainment” complex of well-paid and ostensibly attractive people telling you what happened today, in their own words.  Where are these exorbitant salaries generated?  During the commercial breaks that these television personalities are tasked with leading you in and out of. So, of course, a grain of salt is necessary when getting any information from these wealthy pundits. In our modern day, however, there is a new realm in which we can find ourselves bamboozled by “facts” and the gatekeepers that control them.  I’m speaking, of course, about the internet – a place whose ideas about free speech certainly don’t line up with the reality on the ground. While most of the discussion about internet censorship and far-left fascism revolve around entities such as Facebook and Google, a new tidbit of information has Wikipedia coming under fire as well. A report in Huffington Post recently revealed the case of Wikipedia editor Ed Sussman, who was paid by media clients such as NBC and Axios to help diminish critical material. Paid editors operating in a similar manner to Sussman have worked on behalf of CNN contributor Hilary Rosen and the CEOs of Reddit and Intel, among other clients. Other conduct by Sussman not covered by the Huffington Post shows him authoring fluff pieces for NBC executives and getting his proposed changes approved by another paid Wikipedia editor. Just how sleazy are the adjustments? In one example Feinberg cited, Sussman requested changes to the page of Axios journalist Jonathan Swan regarding a false report he made last September claiming…

Continue Reading

News

Jussie Smollett SKATES! All Charges DROPPED!

Is this just another case of Hollywood getting away with hate? We may never know, according to court documents.

Published

on

Jussie Smollett

In one of the most heinous and bizarre cases in recent memory, actor Jussie Smollett preyed upon the mainstream media’s “hate crime” fervor to decide the American people…or so we thought. The story was a strange and sordid one, in which Smollett was investigated for a series of hoaxes in which the actor was believed to have been both the perpetrator and the victim.  Chicago Police even went so far as to explain his motivations, conveying that Smollett was hoping to raise his public persona in order to further bolster his compensation as an actor. Now, all of that has been turned upside down. Chicago prosecutors on Tuesday dropped criminal charges against “Empire” star Jussie Smollett, who had been accused of staging a phony hate crime against himself. Smollett, who was charged with disorderly conduct, appeared at an emergency court hearing Tuesday morning, where the case was dismissed. Will we ever know the truth?  Likely not. The dismissal means that records of the case will be sealed to public view. There was no plea deal that led to the dismissal of charges. His lawyers were predictably elated. “Today, all criminal charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and his record has been wiped clean of the filing of this tragic complaint against him,” Smollett’s legal team said in a statement Tuesday, according to NBC. “Jussie was attacked by two people he was unable to identify on January 29th.” There has been no indication yet as to whether or not Smollett’s previous “hate crime” incident involving a threatening letter that he was found to have mailed to himself will be further investigated. Without the underlying documents, it will be difficult to assess just why these charges were dropped, leading many Americans to believe that this is just another case of liberal celebrities avoiding…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

Send this to a friend