Connect with us

News

Where Are the Demonstrations for Victims of Street Violence? (Opinion)

Good question…

Published

on

The death of George Floyd while in police custody is a tragedy. No question. Does it justify a protest? Yes, but against that one event and that event alone. The protests we have seen imply that Floyd’s demise is not an isolated incident. They imply that it is evidence of systemic racism against blacks, that police violence against blacks is pervasive and universal, and that blacks are deliberately targeted by white police.

None of these conclusions is factual.

What concerns me is this: What about the protests for police and civilians, white and black, who have been killed or injured this week by rioters? Where are the demonstrations? Where is the outrage? Where are the protests for Dave Patrick Underwood? He was a Federal Protective Services officer who was shot and killed Friday night as protests and riots took place in the city of Oakland. Mr. Underwood, like Mr. Floyd, was black. David Dorn, a 77-year-old black retired police captain, was fatally shot as he defended a pawnshop during looting in St. Louis.

Where are the demonstrations about Mr. Dorn’s murder? A white man defending his store in Dallas died after protesters descended on him, hurling rocks at him, kicking him in the head and beating his face with skateboards and fists. Where are the protests for his murder? Where are the protests for the 19-year-old man who was killed in Detroit as hundreds of people rioted in the city’s downtown area. A speeding car slammed into an NYPD sergeant on a Bronx street corner, sending him flying into another vehicle and onto the pavement. I watched the video. It was horrible. He was trying to protect law-abiding citizens and their property. Where are the protests on his behalf?

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Four police officers were hit by gunfire after violent protests in St. Louis. Numerous agents with the United States Secret Service were injured as rioters lit fires and threw objects just outside the White House gates. In Davenport, IA, an officer was shot in an ambush attack as he was responding to a riot. In Boston, a police patrol vehicle was set on fire and at least seven officers were injured while responding to violence in the streets. In Jacksonville, FL, an officer’s neck was slashed with an edged weapon during a riot that erupted in that city on Saturday night. In Salt Lake City, 21 police officers were injured while responding to rioters who stormed the streets over the weekend.

In New York City, at least 33 police officers have been injured.

Where are the demonstrations for them?

“89 cops were killed in the line of duty last year,” said former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik. “Nobody’s talking about them.”

Are you beginning to get the message? For the American Left, it is acceptable to kill police, even if they are African-American. It is acceptable to kill whites under any circumstances. But the murder by police of a black civilian is infinitely worse. Why? Because the problems of black communities are blamed on a so-called tradition of white racism, and violence is considered an acceptable response. Kellie Carter Jackson, a black college professor writing in The Atlantic, typifies this viewpoint: “The philosophy of force and violence to obtain freedom has long been employed by white people and explicitly denied to black Americans. Only one thing is clear—there is no form of black protest that white supremacy will sanction. Still, black people understand the utility of riotous rebellion: Violence compels a response. Violence disrupts the status quo and the possibility of returning to business as usual.” This is what our college students are being taught. No wonder they want to loot and burn.

The leftist canard that racist police and the justice system deliberately discriminate against African-Americans is a lie. In 2020, it is ridiculous to suggest that white police are gunning for blacks. According to the FBI Uniform Crime Report, 41 unarmed people were shot and killed by police last year. Of them, 19 were white and only 9 were black. Statistics clearly demonstrate that large numbers of black males are in jail because black males commit a disproportionately high percentage of all crimes. The bulk of responsibility, says former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, is on African-Americans “who commit murder eight times more per capita than any other group in our society.” Black talk show host Larry Elder agrees, saying that, “Numerical disparities result from differences of offending, not because of racism.” The police, says Heather Mac Donald in The War on Cops, are not the enemy. They are trying to protect blacks from criminals. Many blacks, concerned about the level of black on black crime, are begging for more cops in their neighborhoods.

We are witnessing thousands of violent demonstrators who are using Mr. Floyd’s death as a convenient excuse to destroy our civil society. Many Democrats support them because they do not believe in the rule of law. They believed Obama when he said we should fundamentally change America, a country that only exists because of the Constitution and our legal system.

Fortunately, Obama’s successor in the Oval Office respects the rule of law. With it, we are the light of the world. Without it, the country as we know it will cease to exist.

Ed Brodow is a conservative political commentator, negotiation expert, and regular contributor to Newsmax, Daily Caller, American Thinker, Townhall, LifeZette, Media Equalizer, Reactionary Times, and other online news magazines. He is the author of eight books including his latest blockbuster, Trump’s Turn: Winning the New Civil War.

News

DOD Will Stop Paying Military Members Who Refuse Vaccine

Hasn’t this gone on long enough?

Published

on

military troops

At this point in the pandemic, perhaps the only thing that we know for sure is that we don’t really know when the end will finally arrive.  The virus has continued to power through unpredictable waves, each with their own distinct set of warnings from the powers that be.

And so, not knowing when any of this will be considered “over”, (at least in the federal government’s eyes), overreaching vaccine mandates continue to be enforced.

The latest threat to the unvaccinated takes aim at the US military, hitting service members directly in the wallet.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has ordered that all members of the National Guard and Reserve must receive Covid vaccines or face loss of pay and being marked absent without cause from drills and training, according to a copy of a memo obtained by NBC News.

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

On Aug. 24, Austin made the Covid vaccine mandatory for all service members and directing the secretaries of the military services to issue their own implementation guidance and timelines. The mandate extended to all service members on active duty or in the Ready Reserve, including the National Guard.

On Nov. 2, Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma wrote a letter to Austin, asking him to rescind the vaccine mandate for members of the Oklahoma National Guard. Days later, Stitt appointed a new adjutant general of the Oklahoma National Guard who said he would not enforce the vaccine mandate.

But the DOD wasn’t having it.

On Monday, Austin responded to Stitt, denying his request to rescind the mandate for the Oklahoma National Guard. What remained unclear, however, was how the Pentagon planned to enforce the mandate for members of the National Guard while they are on state duty. Most of the time, including when they are training, members are on state duty and answer to their governor.

Further, those who are unable to participate in their duties due to their vaccination status will be accusing no time served during their absences.

At this point in the pandemic, perhaps the only thing that we know for sure is that we don’t really know when the end will finally arrive.  The virus has continued to power through unpredictable waves, each with their own distinct set of warnings from the powers that be. And so, not knowing when any of this will be considered “over”, (at least in the federal government’s eyes), overreaching vaccine mandates continue to be enforced. The latest threat to the unvaccinated takes aim at the US military, hitting service members directly in the wallet. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has ordered that all members of the National Guard and Reserve must receive Covid vaccines or face loss of pay and being marked absent without cause from drills and training, according to a copy of a memo obtained by NBC News. On Aug. 24, Austin made the Covid vaccine mandatory for all service members and directing the secretaries of the military services to issue their own implementation guidance and timelines. The mandate extended to all service members on active duty or in the Ready Reserve, including the National Guard. On Nov. 2, Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma wrote a letter to Austin, asking him to rescind the vaccine mandate for members of the Oklahoma National Guard. Days later, Stitt appointed a new adjutant general of the Oklahoma National Guard who said he would not enforce the vaccine mandate. But the DOD wasn’t having it. On Monday, Austin responded to Stitt, denying his request to rescind the mandate for the Oklahoma National Guard. What remained unclear, however, was how the Pentagon planned to enforce the mandate for members of the National Guard while they are on state duty. Most of the time, including when they are training, members are on state duty and…

Continue Reading

News

Putin Draws ‘Red Line’ in Ukraine, Says Foreign Meddling Could Lead to Missile Strike

This certainly isn’t the first time that Putin felt the urge to proclaim his bravado to the world, but it may be one of the last times that he gets to do so without retaliation. 

Published

on

Vladimir Putin

There are few villains more readily apparent in this world of ours than Vladimir Putin.

The Russian leader, (who’s bent and rewritten the rules to remain in power for decades), has dropped his mask.  He’s no longer trying to hide his intentions, or even claim that he’s not being a bully.  Instead, the former KGB man has simply decided that he’s going to do what he wants, and there’s nothing that anyone can do about it.

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday sternly warned NATO against deploying its troops and weapons to Ukraine, saying it represents a red line for Russia and would trigger a strong response.

Commenting on Western concerns about Russia’s alleged intention to invade Ukraine, he said that Moscow is equally worried about NATO drills near its borders.

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Speaking to participants of an online investment forum. Putin said that NATO’s eastward expansion has threatened Russia’s core security interests. He expressed concern that NATO could eventually use the Ukrainian territory to deploy missiles capable of reaching Moscow in just five minutes.

“The emergence of such threats represents a ‘red line’ for us,” Putin said. “I hope that it will not get to that and common sense and responsibility for their own countries and the global community will eventually prevail.”

Then, not so subtly…

He added that Russia has been forced to counter the growing threats by developing new hypersonic weapons.

“What should we do?” Putin said. “We would need to develop something similar to target those who threaten us. And we can do that even now.”

He said a new hypersonic missile that is set to enter service with the Russian navy early next year would be capable of reaching targets in comparable time.

“It would also need just five minutes to reach those who issue orders,” Putin said.

This certainly isn’t the first time that Putin felt the urge to proclaim his bravado to the world, but it may be one of the last times that he gets to do so without retaliation.

There are few villains more readily apparent in this world of ours than Vladimir Putin. The Russian leader, (who’s bent and rewritten the rules to remain in power for decades), has dropped his mask.  He’s no longer trying to hide his intentions, or even claim that he’s not being a bully.  Instead, the former KGB man has simply decided that he’s going to do what he wants, and there’s nothing that anyone can do about it. Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday sternly warned NATO against deploying its troops and weapons to Ukraine, saying it represents a red line for Russia and would trigger a strong response. Commenting on Western concerns about Russia’s alleged intention to invade Ukraine, he said that Moscow is equally worried about NATO drills near its borders. Speaking to participants of an online investment forum. Putin said that NATO’s eastward expansion has threatened Russia’s core security interests. He expressed concern that NATO could eventually use the Ukrainian territory to deploy missiles capable of reaching Moscow in just five minutes. “The emergence of such threats represents a ‘red line’ for us,” Putin said. “I hope that it will not get to that and common sense and responsibility for their own countries and the global community will eventually prevail.” Then, not so subtly… He added that Russia has been forced to counter the growing threats by developing new hypersonic weapons. “What should we do?” Putin said. “We would need to develop something similar to target those who threaten us. And we can do that even now.” He said a new hypersonic missile that is set to enter service with the Russian navy early next year would be capable of reaching targets in comparable time. “It would also need just five minutes to reach those who issue orders,” Putin said.…

Continue Reading
The Schaftlein Report

Latest Articles

Best of the Week