Connect with us

News

Whistleblower’s Identity Exposed, Registered Dem Who Worked for Obama, Biden, Brennan

Will the media care?

John Salvatore

Published

on

We knew some stuff about the whistleblower. For example, like that we was an anti-Trump leftist who was most likely a registered Democrat, hellbent on interfering in the 2020 election and attempting to oust a duly-elected president from office.

You know, stuff like that. It was pretty much a given, at this point, considering how horrible the left has been in their attempts at impeaching POTUS. They’re just not very good at keeping secrets they want to be kept secret secret because THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY’RE DOING. Here’s the scoop, via RealClear Investigations:

More than two months after the official filed his complaint, pretty much all that’s known publicly about him is that he is a CIA analyst who at one point was detailed to the White House and is now back working at the CIA.

Trending: Tokyo Woke No Mo’: IOC Bans BLM Apparel for Olympics

But the name of a government official fitting that description — Eric Ciaramella — has been raised privately in impeachment depositions, according to officials with direct knowledge of the proceedings, as well as in at least one open hearing held by a House committee not involved in the impeachment inquiry. Fearing their anonymous witness could be exposed, Democrats this week blocked Republicans from asking more questions about him and intend to redact his name from all deposition transcripts.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Derek Chauvin Receive Proper Due Process?

  • Did Derek Chauvin Receive Proper Due Process?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

One tweet sums it all up:

🚨BREAKING 🚨

The White House “whistleblower” is Eric Ciaramella.
– Registered Democrat
– Worked for Obama
– Worked with Joe Biden
– Worked for CIA Director John Brennan
– Vocal critic of Trump
– Helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation hoax

WATCH:

Breaking — A source familiar with the investigation prompted by the whistleblower tells me that the “indicia of bias of an arguable political bias on the part“ of the whistleblower referred to by the Intel Community IG, is that the whistleblower is a Registered Democrat.

2/ The attorney for the whistleblower declined to comment.

The IG said “such evidence did not change my determination that the complaint relating to the urgent concern ‘appears credible’ particularly given the other information the ICIG obtained during its preliminary review.”

California Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff is arguably President Trump’s loudest critic.

If he’s not lying about POTUS in some form or other, he’s literally pulling made up quotes out of thin air.

Because this is the world in which we now live.

WATCH:

To open a very serious hearing, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) delivers a completely made-up account of President Trump’s conversation with the Ukrainian President.

Very normal and professional.

Reactions:

If the conversation were as damning as Schiff et al would like, he would have simply read directly from it, instead of making up dialogue. Probably not surprising in light of the extravagant collusion claims he made for 2 years.

There isn’t a sleazier human being in politics than corrupt charlatan Adam Schiff. He’s proven over and over that his words are meaningless and his accusations are fairytale-like conspiracy theories. He’s a disgrace to Capitol Hill and to this country.

When you don’t have facts on your side some just make it up. The opening statement by their ring leader was #FullofSchiff. House Dems blatantly lying to justify their impeachment inquiry is horribly timed, poorly written and badly intentioned.

It is disturbing and outrageous that Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff opens up a hearing of this importance with improvised fake dialogue between President Trump and President Zelenskyy. We should focus on the facts.

We now have both the transcript and the complaint.

Anyone who reads them will see they prove what we already knew: @RepAdamSchiff and his cronies will peddle conspiracy theories and distort the truth to attack our President.

It’s wrong.

News

Strange New Correlation Discovered Between COVID and Bald Men

This strain of coronavirus just keeps getting weirder.

Published

on

From the very onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the medical community appeared stumped.  Sure, this was a novel virus and, as such, came complete with a number of strange and unknown consequences. There were your “long-haulers”; folks who seemed to continually have issues recovering from the illness.  Others lost their senses of taste and smell, sometimes for months on end.  There were even reports of so-called “COVID toes” – an ailment that affected the coloration of the skin on toes and fingers of a small percentage of patients. Now, in another odd correlation within the coronavirus spectrum, it appears that men who’d gone bald are at particular risk for certain side effects of COVID-19. New research suggests they spend up to twice as long in hospital with Covid than those who still have a full head of hair. Science seems to have at least some idea of why this is. They are also admitted to intensive care in higher numbers. Scientists say men’s Covid vulnerability largely comes down to male sex hormones called androgens. Men who are genetically more sensitive to androgens appear to be more likely to suffer severe Covid. They are also more likely to have hair loss, called androgenetic alopecia, which affects around half of men over the age of 50. The science seemed to back this up. A team of US doctors measured men’s sensitivity to androgens by counting a chemical called CAG. High levels indicate that a man is more likely to have hair loss. Of 65 men hospitalised with the infection, those with high CAG levels had worse Covid outcomes in the 60 days following their hospitlisation. They spent 47 days in hospital, on average, and 70.6 per cent were admitted to ICU. For comparison, those with low CAG levels spent an average of 25 days…

Continue Reading

News

Officers Who Witnessed George Floyd’s Death Facing Federal Charges

The charges appear to stem from the DOJ’s investigation into the Minneapolis police department.

Published

on

After nearly a year of turmoil and tumult, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted in the killing of George Floyd – a local man who succumbed to asphyxiation as Chauvin knelt on his neck and back for nearly 9 minutes. The incident kicked off a national racial reckoning that transformed a great deal of our popular culture during a time in which many of us were still living in fear of a global pandemic. Now, as Chauvin’s legal team prepares a hefty appeal to the ruling, other officers who were present during Floyd’s death are facing federal charges on account of their hesitance to render aid to the dying man. The federal indictment accuses Chauvin — who held his knee on or around the neck of a handcuffed and prone Floyd for more than nine minutes — of killing the 46-year-old while violating his rights to be protected from use of unreasonable force by a police officer. It also accuses two of Chauvin’s fellow cops — Tou Thao and J. Alexander Kueng — of “willfully” failing to intervene to stop Chauvin from using unreasonable force, a failure that also led to Floyd’s death. All three ex-officers, along with the fourth, Thomas Lane, are accused of letting Floyd die by willfully failing to aid him when they saw Floyd “lying on the ground in clear need of medical care.” The charges appear to stem from a DOJ investigation into the practices and policies of the Minneapolis Police Department, and whether or not the culture of the organization has created an unacceptable sense of violence or entitlement among officers there.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week