Connect with us

Opinion

Why Do Dems Keep Threatening To Nuke Gun Owners?

During his crime speech Dementia Joe blamed guns for the crime wave and repeated supporter Eric Swalwell’s threat to nuke gun owners

Published

on

russia

There were many frightening parts of Biden’s crime speech, during which he seemed more feeble than ever. Perhaps the most frightening part of the text is that the man with his finger on “the button” threatened to nuke American citizens. His threat echoed the one made by his buddy Eric Swalwell (D-CA). Swalwell threatened to nuke Americans who didn’t want their guns confiscated. nuke the gun owners

Speaking to Sean Hannity about President Biden’s Wednesday speech about crime, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) said, ““Whoever is advising the president on crime, and I don’t know who it is, but whoever it is, his Secret Service name ought to be ‘Butthead.'” The senator was too kind.

 

Trending: Civilian Alerts Airmen After Noticing Something Odd Coming from Back of F-15 Jet, Now They're Thanking Him

Biden was addressing (or trying to address) the fact that crime, especially violent crime, is way up

The President believes he has figured out what is behind the rapid crime increase. No, it has nothing to do with the defunding the police movement or cops quitting because of lack of support from the leadership of their municipalities, a lack of support that causes the remaining police officers to back away from confronting criminals to keep their jobs. It has nothing to do with no bail laws or D.A.s not prosecuting crimes, or even the weak political leadership afraid to confront BLM and Antifa that are still rioting in some cities such as Portland.

NO, Joe Biden doesn’t believe it has anything to do with those issues–the crime wave is caused by guns. And those gun owners want to overthrow the government, according to Biden:

The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a cannon.

Those who say the blood of lib- — “the blood of patriots,” you know, and all the stuff about how we’re going to have to move against the government. Well, the tree of liberty is not watered with the blood of patriots. What’s happened is that there have never been — if you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.

Remember in the movie Toy Story after the humans leave the room, the toys come alive and take on human qualities? By ignoring the real cause and focusing on guns, Biden was implying that the same thing happens with firearms. When humans leave the room, guns go out and commit crimes on their own. But this wasn’t a cartoon. It was real life, and the President threatened the American people (and discussed deer wearing kevlar vests).

With his nuclear threat, Dementia Joe was echoing his good friend Eric Swalwell. During a 2018 Twitter dialogue on gun confiscation, Swalwell tweeted the following in response to a tweet angry about Swalwell’s “confiscation” threat. After one tweet promised to fight back against any attempt to confiscate guns, the California Democrat threatened to nuke the gun owners.

What is it with Democrats? Why do they threaten American citizens who believe in the Second Amendment with a nuclear attack?

Remember, the Constitution wasn’t written to restrict American citizens. It was written to restrict the Federal government.

The Second Amendment wasn’t created because the Founders thought local groups of armed citizens could prevail in combat against the full resources of the Federal government. Even in a world without AR-15s, nukes, and tanks, the Founders didn’t expect that. Part of their reason for the Amendment (there were many) was that armed citizens would deter government excesses. The cost of trying to ram through overreach on an armed people would be too high, and the federal government would rarely if ever, be willing to start that fight.

But the Democrats seem to be willing to start that fight…with nuclear weapons.

Opinion

Fleeing Texas Democrat Now Facing Arrest Warrant

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

Published

on

Instead of accepting defeat in the state legislature, the Democrats of the Texas statehouse decided that they’d simply whisk themselves away to Washington DC to prevent a vote on an election integrity bill to occur. This was the second time they had pulled a stunt like this in less than a year, and Texas Governor Greg Abbott has now said that these lawmakers will be arrested upon their reentry to Texas, and taken to the legislature to make certain that the vote occurs. Now it seems as though members of the Texas GOP are making good on Abbott’s promise. Speaker of the House Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) signed a civil arrest warrant on Monday for State Representative Philip Cortez (D-San Antonio) for his failure to return to the House of Representatives, the Texas Tribune reported. Cortez abandoned his fellow Democrats late last week when he unexpectedly returned to Texas. Cortez claimed he returned to Austin to attempt to engage in a “good faith dialogue” on the matter of House Bill 3, the election law reform bill. After receiving harsh criticism from fellow Democrats for returning to Austin without consulting them, Cortez returned to Washington, D.C. The San Antonio Democrat currently serves as chairman of the House Urban Affairs Committee. Speaker Phelan issued a statement saying, in part, that Cortez had “irrevocably broken my trust and the trust of the chamber.” The speaker added that Cortez “represented to me and his fellow members that he wanted to work on policy and find solutions to bring his colleagues back to Texas.” The bill in question has been criticized by Texas Democrats as unfairly prohibitive to communities of color, while the GOP says that the law would simply strengthen the security of the election itself, in an effort to prevent fraud from occurring.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Liz Cheney Takes Aim at Trump During Opening Statement at Jan 6 Hearing

She’s still claiming this is “nonpartisan”, however.

Published

on

The Republican Party has made it very clear that they are not interested in any sort of re-trial of Donald Trump in regard to the events of January 6th, and that any attempt to steer an investigation his direction would be considered bit of partisan tomfoolery on behalf of those who engage in such speculation. Therein lies the problem for the Nancy Pelosi-led special committee on January 6th, in that they can’t afford to be considered a partisan affair, but they are almost certainly itching for a chance to attack the former Commander in Chief. Liz Cheney, one of the few Republicans involved in the current probe, wasted no time in going there on Tuesday, however. “The American people deserve the full and open testimony of every person with knowledge of the planning and preparation for January 6th,” Cheney said in her opening statement. The Wyoming Republican has gone on record for criticizing her GOP colleagues for supporting the former president — whom many say incited his supporters to attack the Capitol — and undermining an investigation into the events of Jan. 6. She was voted out of her role as chair of the House Republican Conference in May as a result. And then… “We must also know what happened every minute of that day in the White House – every phone call, every conversation, every meeting leading up to, during, and after the attack. Honorable men and women have an obligation to step forward,” Cheney said. Tuesday’s hearing featured the testimony of a number of police officers who were involved in attempting to stop the insurrection that occurred that day, and set the tone for a heated and lengthy probe to come.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week