Connect with us

Opinion

With Nothing Else to Offer, The Left Is Itching for A Fight — An Opinion Piece

As we approach mere weeks ‘til the election, Leftists will…

Jeff Davidson

Published

on

As we approach mere weeks ‘til the election, Leftists will become more desperate, their tactics more vile, and their utter disdain for America more evident. Any excuse for another round of riots nationwide will do.

In times of turmoil, is toxic, heated rhetoric emanating from the White House justifiable?

“They bring a knife – we bring a gun.”
“I want you to argue with them and get in their face!”
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
“Hit back twice as hard.”
“We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.”
“The other party’s victory would mean hand to hand combat.”
“Punish your enemies.”
“I’m itching for a fight.”

Trending: Former CNN Host: If GOP Attempts ‘to Replace RBG We Burn the Entire F— Thing Down’

Such combative political discourse must be from Donald Trump, right? Except Trump didn’t say any of the above, Barack Obama did, as president. Oh, well… not a big deal, you say? Then your double standard is showing. How can such statements be labeled contentious rhetoric if supposedly uttered by Donald Trump, but not if said by verbatim Barack Obama?

take our poll - story continues below

Trump or Biden, who will win?

  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Orchestrated and On Cue

Not coincidentally, the June, July, and August protests and eventual riots were built on the false notion that Trump incited them. The Left – especially George Soros-funded groups – has few other strategies to fire up their base. As he makes one moronic statement after another, there is little enthusiasm for the presidency of Joe Biden, even among many staunch leftists. The uber-liberal New York Times has reported on this. When Biden became his party’s presumptive nominee, the resulting fanfare was non-existent. Bernie Sanders generated enthusiasm; Joe Biden does not. Kamala Harris does not.

Biden’s handful of ‘rallies’ draws tiny numbers; camera coverage and photos are always close-in to mask the size of his minuscule crowds. Meanwhile, the rest of lib-stream press does all it can, non-stop, to make it seem as if Biden is somehow on equal footing with Trump in terms of voter enthusiasm.

Especially as Trump rises in the polls, especially among minorities, the Left’s fallback strategy is to create havoc. This includes:

1) Alinsky-inspired Leftists, posing as violent Trump supporters, deliberately placed, to deceive the public and press into believing that Trump supporters are violent.

2) Attempt to de-populate any future Trump rallies by placing bogus ticket requests.

3) The fawning press not covering the stories of protesters blocking ambulances, throwing objects, and inciting, in many instances, violence.

4) Making constant accusations of racism and xenophobia

To rally the Left, the puppet masters have few alternatives other than fomenting more of the same. Anything else would result in an election doom. Because those on the Right rarely march in the street or protest – most have jobs and responsibilities – it is always easier to generate a Leftist mob. Fewer of them are employed or have any clue about the degree to which they are manipulated.

What About Debating the Issues?

A curious question arises when assessing the Left’s tactics, be they violent, manipulative, or garden-variety political shenanigans. If the truth was on their side, if their proposed policies and platforms had merit, if their plans for America were viable, wouldn’t they be able to intelligently debate issues? Why would they need to resort to anything beyond the power of their policies and principles?

As a case in point, in any upcoming rallies that President Trump might be able to hold, the Left is planning massive campaigns to hassle attendees. How, precisely, does jostling attendees enhance Leftist causes? News of their tactics quickly spread and, presumably, greater numbers of undecided voters will loathe the Left even more than they already did.

Concurrently, no matter what they attempt, the Left cannot increase the number of people who want to attend a Joe Biden rally. So they turn to disruptive behavior to cover for what they cannot logically defend. Because they can’t protest inside of a sealed-off venue, they resort to the next best tactic they can devise: prevent others from attending or from departing gracefully.

Jeff Davidson is “The Work-Life Balance Expert®” and the premier thought leader on work-life balance, integration, and harmony. Jeff speaks to organizations that seek to enhance their overall productivity by improving the effectiveness of their people. He is the author of Breathing Space, Simpler Living, Dial it Down, and Everyday Project Management. Visit www.BreathingSpace.com for more information.

Save conservative media!

News

Biden Said He Received Full Scholarship, Graduated Top of His Law School Class — He Lied

And he plagiarized, too…

John Salvatore

Published

on

As a career politician, Joe Biden knows a thing or two about lying. Even though he has been caught telling falsehoods many, many times over, the mainstream media and his supporters still decide to look the other way. For example, here’s a quote from Joe, speaking to a reporter, while running for president in 1988: “I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect. I went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my — in my class to have a full academic scholarship. In the first year in law school I decided didn’t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds of my class, and then decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school, and in fact ended up in the top half of my class. I won the international moot-court competition. I was the outstanding student in the political science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits — I only needed 123 credits. And I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like Frank.” The problem is that literally nothing in that statement is true. None of it. From The Daily Wire: It turned out that Biden did not receive a full academic scholarship, but a half scholarship based on financial need. He did not end up in the top half of his class, but near the very bottom. There is no record of him winning the moot court competition. He did not receive the outstanding student award at the University of Delaware. And he graduated with only one degree. For the record, this is Biden’s third run for POTUS (1988, 2008, 2020). After…

Continue Reading

News

I Will Nominate A Woman for Supreme Court Next Week, Trump Says At North Carolina Rally

This third pick needs to be a person that will have conservatives cheering.

John Salvatore

Published

on

Donald Trump’s presidency has already been historic for a number of reasons. He will add to his legacy in the coming days, when he nominates a third person to the Supreme Court in just his first term. Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have sided with the liberal wing of SCOTUS from time to time, so those two choices weren’t exactly home runs. Still, they definitely lean right. This third pick needs to be a person that will have conservatives cheering. LOOK: https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork/status/1307458271377227776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307458271377227776%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F09%2Fcrowd-begins-chanting-fill-seat-trump-rally-north-carolina-president-trump-announces-will-name-nominee-week-woman%2F WATCH: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307486709521809419?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307486709521809419%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-says-scotus-pick-will-be-a-woman-here-are-12-possibilities https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1307486631373438976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307486631373438976%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-says-scotus-pick-will-be-a-woman-here-are-12-possibilities From The Daily Wire: ABC News, citing “multiple sources familiar with the thinking of the president and his advisers,” reports that Judge Amy Coney Barrett, 48, of Indiana, is considered a front-runner for the vacant seat. Notably, Barrett was one of the finalists when Trump was considering a replacement for Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose seat was later filled by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. According to USA Today, Judge Barbara Lagoa, 52, a recent addition to the list of potential Supreme Court nominees, is considered a “little-known” front-runner. The news agency reports that Trump briefly mentioned her during remarks to reporters on Saturday, saying that he has “heard at length” about her, and that she is “highly respected.” Let’s hear your thoughts in the comment section…

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Best of the Week

 
Send this to a friend